slides - corpora@parles.upf - Universitat Pompeu Fabra

More documents

Recommendations

Info

2 The Theoretical Framework ING is thus put as ING N (V). Two possibilities will occur for the derivation to converge: firstly, an item with a C V -functor will be qualified. For example, enable takes a C V -functor en, and can be merged in the complement of ING N (V) . Secondly, an acateogrial root can be merged in the complement position, and in this case, the syntactic environment will make this root V-equivalent, that is, this root will take a V category: Borer (forthcoming)
2 The Theoretical Framework 2.2 On Syn-Compounds Borer argues that the Syn-Compound is in nature identical like other simple event nominals (R-Nominal) such as class, lecture, etc. This type of compound is formed via two steps: N and V are combined first, and then the non-head part N is moved to the left side of V, so that V can combine with the C-functor (ING/ER), with the whole compound being nominalised. Borer also assumes that ING/ER in Syn-Compounds take an ORIGINATOR function, which explains why when the non-head part of the compound is taken as the internal argument of the verb, the verb has to be transitive.
Page 1 and 2: A Parametric Account of Chinese and
Page 3 and 4: 1 Chinese Syn-Compounds: Data & Iss
Page 5 and 6: 1 Chinese Syn-Compounds: Data & Iss
Page 7: 2 The Theoretical Framework The se
Page 11 and 12: 3.1 The N-V type This predicts that
Page 13 and 14: 3.1 The N-V type Another issue is t
Page 15 and 16: 3.2 The V-N Type Compound (12) A t
Page 17 and 18: 3.2 The V-N Type Compound The para
Page 19 and 20: 3.2 The V-N Type Compound The new
Page 21 and 22: 3.2 The V-N Type Compound Why are
Page 23: References Ackema, P. & A. Neeleman

slides - corpora@parles.upf - Universitat Pompeu Fabra

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?