mcbem-2014-01-submission-wwf-en

Recommendations

Info

threshold shifts in hearing ability. Marine animals that lose their ability to hear the sound of approaching predators or the ability to detect their prey acoustically are at greater risk of mortality. Ultimately, in certain conditions high-energy noise can result in direct mortality. It is not within the scope of this backgrounder to provide a full review of the potential impacts of underwater noise on marine life, and there are many references that address this topic in significant detail. A number have been published within the last 10 years, almost all of which call for further research (Table A9). This list is not comprehensive, but rather a sampling of the literature. The complete reference is provided in the Relevant Literature section of this backgrounder. Table A9. A selection of recent literature on the effects of underwater noise on marine life. Complete details of each reference are provided in the Relevant Literature section below. This list is not comprehensive. Author (date) NRC (2003) IACMST (2006) Nowacek et al. (2007) Southall et al. (2007) Weilgart (2007) Wright and Highfill (2007) Wright (2008) Boyd et al. (2008) Hawkins et al. (2008) OSPAR (2009) Popper and Hastings (2009) Slabbekoorn et al. (2010) Normandeau and associates (2012) Popper and Hawkins (2012) Focus of paper A synthesis of what is known about marine mammals and noise A summary report on the effects of underwater noise on marine life from a UK perspective A review of behavioural response of marine mammals to noise A review of the impacts of noise on marine mammals with criteria for noise exposure standards for the US A synthesis of the impacts of noise on cetaceans A collection of papers on the effects of noise on marine life A review of the impacts of shipping noise on marine mammals A draft research strategy to assess the effects of noise on marine mammals A collection of papers presented at the 2007 ‘Effects of noise on aquatic life’ conference in Nyborg, Denmark A synthesis of the impacts of underwater noise on marine life A synthesis of the effects of anthropogenic noise on fish A synthesis of the consequences of increasing ambient noise levels for fish A synthesis of the effects of noise on fish and invertebrates A collection of papers presented at the 2010 ‘Effects of noise on aquatic life’ conference in Cork, Ireland Acknowledgements A sincere thanks to WWF Canada for providing me the opportunity to share my thoughts on underwater noise with others, and to Ross Chapman, Lindy Weilgart and Lance Barrett-Lennard for their feedback on earlier drafts. Any errors or omissions are completely my own. 84
Bibliography A selection of reviews or papers, some of which are cited in this backgrounder, which may be helpful in dealing with underwater noise management issues. All have been published within the last 10 years, and this list is not comprehensive. Ainslie, M. 2010. Principles of Sonar Performance Modeling. Spinger Praxis Publ. Chichester, UK. Abramson, E. 2012. Vessel strikes and acoustic impacts. Gulf of the Farallones and Cordell Bank National Marine Sanctuaries: Report of a joint working group of the Gulf of the Farallones and Cordell Bank National Marine Sanctuaries Advisory Councils. 44pp. Accessed on May 22, 2013 at http://sanctuaries.noaa.gov/protect/shipstrike/pdfs/strikes_acoustic.pdf Agardy, T., N. Aguilar, A. Cañadas, M. Engel et al., 2007. A global scientific workshop on spatial-temporal management of noise: report of the scientific workshop. 44 pp. Accessed on May 22, 2013 at http://whitelab.biology.dal.ca/lw/publications/OKEANOS.%20Agardy%20et%20al.%202007%20Manage ment%20noise.pdf Bingham, G. (editor) 2011. Status and applications of acoustic mitigation and monitoring systems for marine mammals: workshop proceedings; November 17-19, 2009. Boston, MA. US Dept. of the Interior, Bureau of Ocean Energy Management. OCS Study BOEMRE 2011002. 384 pp. Accessed on May 22, 2013 at http://mhk.pnnl.gov/wiki/images/5/5d/Status_and_Applications_of_Acoustic_and_Monitoring_Systems .pdf Boyd, I., B. Brownell, D. Cato, C. Clark. et al. 2008. The effects of anthropogenic sound on marine mammals: a draft research strategy. European Science Foundation. Position Paper 13. Accessed May 25, 2013 at http://www.esf.org/fileadmin/Public_documents/Publications/MBpp13.pdf Chapman, N.R. and A. Price. 2011. Low frequency deep ocean ambient noise trend in the Northeast Pacific Ocean. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. Express Letters 129: EL161-EL165. DFO. 2012. Risk-based assessment framework to identify priorities for ecosystem-based oceans management in the Pacific region. DFO Can. Sci. Advis. Sec. Rep 2012/044. Ellison, W.T., B.L. Southall, C.W. Clark, and A.S. Frankel. 2011. A new context-based approach to assess marine mammal behavioral responses to anthropogenic sounds. Conservation Biology 26: 21-28. Erbe, C., A. MacGilvay and R. Williams. 2012a. Mapping cumulative noise from shipping and marine spatial planning. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. Express Letters 132: EL423-428. Erbe, C., A. Duncan and M. Koessler. 2012b. Modelling noise exposure statistics from current and projected shipping activity in northern British Columbia. Report submitted to WWF Canada by Curtin University, Australia. Accessed on May 25, 2013. http://awsassets.wwf.ca/downloads/modelling_noise_exposure_statistics_from_current_and_projecte d_shipping_activity_in_n.pdf Fay, R.R. and A.N. Popper. 2000. Evolution of hearing in vertebrates: The inner ears and processing. Hearing Research 149: 1-10. Hawkins, A.D., A.N. Popper, and M. Wahlberg. (editors) 2008. International conference on the effects of noise on aquatic life. Bioacoustics 17: 1-350. Hatch, L. and A.J. Wright. 2007. A brief review of anthropogenic sound in the oceans. International Journal of Comparative Psychology 20: 121-133 85
Page 1 and 2:
Finding Management Solutions for Un
Page 3 and 4:
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................
Page 5 and 6:
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Recognizing that
Page 7 and 8:
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS WWF Canada is grat
Page 9 and 10:
Acoustic reserves as a strategy to
Page 11 and 12:
Pressure amplitude rms amplitude =
Page 13 and 14:
Rodkin, R.B. and J. A. Reyff. 2008.
Page 15 and 16:
Figure 4. Number of vessel visits b
Page 17 and 18:
extent, the shared vessel traffic 7
Page 19 and 20:
No. of Detection Days whales spread
Page 21 and 22:
III - TOOLS TO MANAGE NOISE: MPAs M
Page 23 and 24:
do to the ocean’s biodiversity (o
Page 25 and 26:
Figure 8. Summary of the EU Marine
Page 27 and 28:
activities are subject to the Act
Page 29 and 30:
Hatch, L.T., C.W. Clark, S.M. Van P
Page 31 and 32:
At the operations stage, Northern G
Page 34 and 35: Mechanisms for Managing Underwater
Page 36 and 37: The acoustic environment can be a f
Page 38 and 39: Hobday et al., 2011; Lawson & Lesag
Page 40 and 41: Framework to Incorporate and Quanti
Page 42 and 43: A Compensation and Mitigation Strat
Page 44 and 45: equirements that vessels meet noise
Page 46 and 47: develop a 3 year work plan for envi
Page 48 and 49: For the future, the IMO Energy Effi
Page 50 and 51: The CG prepared a report for DE 56
Page 52 and 53: The IMO and Potential Solutions for
Page 54 and 55: Consider a zoned approach, with a c
Page 56 and 57: There are multiple approaches that
Page 58 and 59: D. What could we achieve within the
Page 60 and 61: Push for administrative actions. Th
Page 62 and 63: Address masking, a significant thre
Page 64 and 65: The Federal government should suppo
Page 66 and 67: speaker) revealed that only 11 of 1
Page 68 and 69: As part of the efforts by the volun
Page 70 and 71: Friday June 7, 2013 Time Activity S
Page 72 and 73: First Name Last Name Affiliation Do
Page 74 and 75: Amplitude Table A1. The speed of so
Page 76 and 77: Table A2. The five functional heari
Page 78 and 79: There are a number of ways to descr
Page 80 and 81: Amplitude 1 0.5 Rise time 0 -0.5 .0
Page 82 and 83: thrusters, machinery noise (esp. th
Page 86 and 87: Henderson, D. 2007. Creation of noi
Page 88 and 89: Underwater noise and other forms of
Page 90 and 91: iological diversity, fish populatio
Page 92 and 93: If the impacts cannot be mitigated,
Page 94 and 95: ii PROVISIONS FOR REDUCTION OF NOIS
Page 96: xix xx Fisheries Act,RSC 1985, c F-
show all

mcbem-2014-01-submission-wwf-en

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?