Integrating Biodiversity Conservation into Oil and Gas ... - EBI
Integrating Biodiversity Conservation into Oil and Gas ... - EBI
Integrating Biodiversity Conservation into Oil and Gas ... - EBI
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
3. INTEGRATING BIODIVERSITY INTO MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS<br />
AND OPERATIONS<br />
How can companies integrate biodiversity considerations <strong>into</strong> their management systems <strong>and</strong> operations?<br />
In order to effectively integrate biodiversity considerations<br />
<strong>into</strong> its decision-making <strong>and</strong> activities, a company does<br />
not need to adopt an entirely new suite of systems or<br />
practices. The ideas in this report <strong>and</strong> its accompanying<br />
products are most likely to be adopted <strong>and</strong> used<br />
systematically if they can be integrated <strong>into</strong> a company’s<br />
ongoing management systems <strong>and</strong> operations. Thus,<br />
the products of the <strong>EBI</strong> are designed to build on systems<br />
already widely used within the industry, as the basis<br />
for improvement of performance wherever oil <strong>and</strong> gas<br />
operations take place.<br />
The basic core process with which leading companies<br />
in the energy industry currently manage environmental<br />
issues is either an Environmental Management System<br />
(EMS) or an integrated Health, Safety <strong>and</strong> Environmental<br />
Management System (HSEMS). Within this system,<br />
one of the most important tools for underst<strong>and</strong>ing <strong>and</strong><br />
addressing actual or potential impacts to biodiversity,<br />
particularly for new projects, is the Environmental <strong>and</strong><br />
Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) process. Both the<br />
EMS/HSEMS <strong>and</strong> ESIA are dynamic processes that evolve<br />
through the different stages of each project’s lifecycle.<br />
Although not all companies have such systems in place,<br />
they are recognized industry good practice <strong>and</strong> a desired<br />
goal for responsible management of environmental issues.<br />
This section <strong>and</strong> its related <strong>EBI</strong> products offer<br />
suggestions for ways that a company can integrate<br />
biodiversity considerations <strong>into</strong> its EMS at both a<br />
company <strong>and</strong> project level, as well as <strong>into</strong> its ESIA<br />
process. Although biodiversity should be a part of any<br />
EMS or ESIA, actions <strong>and</strong> activities to manage <strong>and</strong><br />
conserve biodiversity should be based on a valid <strong>and</strong><br />
transparent risk assessment process – only in those cases<br />
where there are significant biodiversity issues will many of the<br />
actions in the following sections be necessary (see Box 8).<br />
3.1 INTEGRATING BIODIVERSITY INTO<br />
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS<br />
There are two principal templates for environmental<br />
management within the oil <strong>and</strong> gas sector. One<br />
template is based on the International Organization for<br />
St<strong>and</strong>ardization’s Environmental Management Systems<br />
– Specification with Guidance for Use (ISO 14001),<br />
published in 1996. The other is based on the Guidelines<br />
for the Development <strong>and</strong> Application of Health, Safety <strong>and</strong><br />
Environmental Management Systems, published by the<br />
E&P Forum (now named the International <strong>Oil</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Gas</strong><br />
Producers Association, or OGP) in 1994.<br />
While these are the most commonly used systems, the<br />
suggestions offered here <strong>and</strong> in the related <strong>EBI</strong> guide<br />
BOX 8. THE IMPORTANCE OF RISK ASSESSMENT<br />
Energy companies make operational <strong>and</strong> policy decisions in the context of a broad-based risk management system that<br />
evaluates the costs <strong>and</strong> benefits of different options, based on financial, operational, strategic <strong>and</strong> reputational criteria,<br />
as well as risks to wider society <strong>and</strong> the environment. Consideration <strong>and</strong> implementation of the actions <strong>and</strong> practices<br />
outlined in each section of this document should be based on the results of a comprehensive risk assessment process that<br />
considers the level of risk to biodiversity, operations <strong>and</strong> company reputation from different courses of action. Only in<br />
those cases where there are significant risks to biodiversity or to the company <strong>and</strong> potential negative impacts will many of<br />
the in-depth biodiversity management practices discussed in this document <strong>and</strong> its accompanying tools be necessary. The<br />
criteria for determining whether a risk or an impact is significant will vary from location to location <strong>and</strong> project to project.<br />
Each company has its own definition of significance <strong>and</strong> its own level of risk threshold, based on values, experiences <strong>and</strong><br />
company processes. Likewise, each conservation organization has its own definition of significance <strong>and</strong> its own level of risk<br />
threshold, independent of its association with energy companies.<br />
22 The Energy & <strong>Biodiversity</strong> Initiative