31.10.2014 Views

Integrating Biodiversity Conservation into Oil and Gas ... - EBI

Integrating Biodiversity Conservation into Oil and Gas ... - EBI

Integrating Biodiversity Conservation into Oil and Gas ... - EBI

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

3. INTEGRATING BIODIVERSITY INTO MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS<br />

AND OPERATIONS<br />

How can companies integrate biodiversity considerations <strong>into</strong> their management systems <strong>and</strong> operations?<br />

In order to effectively integrate biodiversity considerations<br />

<strong>into</strong> its decision-making <strong>and</strong> activities, a company does<br />

not need to adopt an entirely new suite of systems or<br />

practices. The ideas in this report <strong>and</strong> its accompanying<br />

products are most likely to be adopted <strong>and</strong> used<br />

systematically if they can be integrated <strong>into</strong> a company’s<br />

ongoing management systems <strong>and</strong> operations. Thus,<br />

the products of the <strong>EBI</strong> are designed to build on systems<br />

already widely used within the industry, as the basis<br />

for improvement of performance wherever oil <strong>and</strong> gas<br />

operations take place.<br />

The basic core process with which leading companies<br />

in the energy industry currently manage environmental<br />

issues is either an Environmental Management System<br />

(EMS) or an integrated Health, Safety <strong>and</strong> Environmental<br />

Management System (HSEMS). Within this system,<br />

one of the most important tools for underst<strong>and</strong>ing <strong>and</strong><br />

addressing actual or potential impacts to biodiversity,<br />

particularly for new projects, is the Environmental <strong>and</strong><br />

Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) process. Both the<br />

EMS/HSEMS <strong>and</strong> ESIA are dynamic processes that evolve<br />

through the different stages of each project’s lifecycle.<br />

Although not all companies have such systems in place,<br />

they are recognized industry good practice <strong>and</strong> a desired<br />

goal for responsible management of environmental issues.<br />

This section <strong>and</strong> its related <strong>EBI</strong> products offer<br />

suggestions for ways that a company can integrate<br />

biodiversity considerations <strong>into</strong> its EMS at both a<br />

company <strong>and</strong> project level, as well as <strong>into</strong> its ESIA<br />

process. Although biodiversity should be a part of any<br />

EMS or ESIA, actions <strong>and</strong> activities to manage <strong>and</strong><br />

conserve biodiversity should be based on a valid <strong>and</strong><br />

transparent risk assessment process – only in those cases<br />

where there are significant biodiversity issues will many of the<br />

actions in the following sections be necessary (see Box 8).<br />

3.1 INTEGRATING BIODIVERSITY INTO<br />

ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS<br />

There are two principal templates for environmental<br />

management within the oil <strong>and</strong> gas sector. One<br />

template is based on the International Organization for<br />

St<strong>and</strong>ardization’s Environmental Management Systems<br />

– Specification with Guidance for Use (ISO 14001),<br />

published in 1996. The other is based on the Guidelines<br />

for the Development <strong>and</strong> Application of Health, Safety <strong>and</strong><br />

Environmental Management Systems, published by the<br />

E&P Forum (now named the International <strong>Oil</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Gas</strong><br />

Producers Association, or OGP) in 1994.<br />

While these are the most commonly used systems, the<br />

suggestions offered here <strong>and</strong> in the related <strong>EBI</strong> guide<br />

BOX 8. THE IMPORTANCE OF RISK ASSESSMENT<br />

Energy companies make operational <strong>and</strong> policy decisions in the context of a broad-based risk management system that<br />

evaluates the costs <strong>and</strong> benefits of different options, based on financial, operational, strategic <strong>and</strong> reputational criteria,<br />

as well as risks to wider society <strong>and</strong> the environment. Consideration <strong>and</strong> implementation of the actions <strong>and</strong> practices<br />

outlined in each section of this document should be based on the results of a comprehensive risk assessment process that<br />

considers the level of risk to biodiversity, operations <strong>and</strong> company reputation from different courses of action. Only in<br />

those cases where there are significant risks to biodiversity or to the company <strong>and</strong> potential negative impacts will many of<br />

the in-depth biodiversity management practices discussed in this document <strong>and</strong> its accompanying tools be necessary. The<br />

criteria for determining whether a risk or an impact is significant will vary from location to location <strong>and</strong> project to project.<br />

Each company has its own definition of significance <strong>and</strong> its own level of risk threshold, based on values, experiences <strong>and</strong><br />

company processes. Likewise, each conservation organization has its own definition of significance <strong>and</strong> its own level of risk<br />

threshold, independent of its association with energy companies.<br />

22 The Energy & <strong>Biodiversity</strong> Initiative

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!