02.11.2014 Views

Bench Bulletin - Issue 12 - Kenya Law Reports

Bench Bulletin - Issue 12 - Kenya Law Reports

Bench Bulletin - Issue 12 - Kenya Law Reports

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

KENYA LAW REPORTS<br />

BENCH BULLETIN<br />

DIGEST OF CASES FEATURED<br />

SENTENCE<br />

Sexual offence - indecent assault on a minor-sentence of 10 years imprisonment-legality of sentence -section<br />

M.B.O v Republic ................................................................................................................................................................................ 52<br />

Trafficking in narcotic drugs - appellant convicted and sentenced to imprisonment for 15 years for the offence of<br />

trafficking in narcotic drugs by the Chief Magistrate’s court – superior court subsequently setting aside the trial court’s<br />

sentence and sentencing the appellant to pay a fine of Kshs. 28 million or in default a twelve year jail term and a prison<br />

term of three and half years - whether the sentences imposed by the courts below were in consonance with section 4(a) of<br />

the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (Control) Act - when an appellate court can interfere with the sentence<br />

imposed by a lower court<br />

Kingsley Chukwu v Republic ............................................................................................................................................................ 55<br />

SUCCESSION LAW<br />

Intestacy - distribution of the estate of the deceased-customary law application-whether it was just to deprive a child of<br />

the deceased person of her father’s estate merely because she was a married daughter and vest the estate in a brother of<br />

the deceased-whether it was the intention of Parliament to exclude the application of intestacy provisions of the Succession<br />

Act (cap 160) to all agricultural land-<strong>Law</strong> of Succession Act (cap 160) sections 32, 33, 38; Judicature Act (cap 8) section<br />

3 (2); Constitution section 82 (1) (4)<br />

Martha Gukiya Thui & Another v Kibugi Hingi & Another [2010] eKLR ................................................................................. 36<br />

Probate and administration - grant of letters of administration - appeal against judgment of the superior court granting<br />

letters of administration to the respondents who were brothers of the deceased on grounds of customary law applicationwhere<br />

the respondents claimed that the deceased was holding the estate in trust for them-whether the superior court was<br />

right in applying customary law in disinheriting the appellants by virtue of being married daughters-whether the appeal<br />

had merit-<strong>Law</strong> of Succession Act (cap 160) sections 32, 33, 71; Registered Lands Act (cap 300) sections 28, 29; Judicature<br />

Act (cap 8) section 3 (2)<br />

Martha Gukiya Thui & Another v Kibugi Hingi & Another [2010] eKLR Civil Appeal No. 306 of 2004 ................................ 36<br />

TORT<br />

Libel – appeal against an award for damages paid to the appellant by the superior court – appellant having claimed that<br />

the respondent circulated a defamatory memo about him – respondent failing to refute the appellant’s claims – guidelines<br />

when testing matters of libel – principles guiding awards to damages – whether KQ was liable for defamation – whether<br />

the appellant was entitled to damages.<br />

Jimi Masege v <strong>Kenya</strong> Airways Limited ............................................................................................................................................ 41<br />

Negligence – damages for injuries suffered due to consumption of contaminated beer – appeal against liability and damages awarded<br />

in the consumer – whether the two lower courts were wrong in holding beer manufacturer liable – the rule in Donoghue v Stevenson –<br />

whether the principles enunciated in the rule were proved – whether duty of care by the appellant to the respondent had been established<br />

– whether negligence by the appellant if any resulted in injury to the respondent<br />

<strong>Kenya</strong> Breweries Ltd v Godfrey Odoyo ........................................................................................................................................... 43<br />

Negligence – liability – where the bottle that was analyzed was not the one consumed by the respondent – appellant alleging that<br />

there was no nexus between the contents of the bottle that was examined and the injury suffered by the respondent – whether report<br />

by <strong>Kenya</strong> Bureau of Standards was improperly obtained – effect of -<br />

<strong>Kenya</strong> Breweries Ltd v Godfrey Odoyo ........................................................................................................................................... 43<br />

8 <strong>Issue</strong> <strong>12</strong>: April-June 2010

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!