02.11.2014 Views

Bench Bulletin - Issue 12 - Kenya Law Reports

Bench Bulletin - Issue 12 - Kenya Law Reports

Bench Bulletin - Issue 12 - Kenya Law Reports

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

KENYA LAW REPORTS<br />

BENCH BULLETIN<br />

DIGEST OF CASES FEATURED<br />

COURT OF APPEAL<br />

CHARGE<br />

Framing of a charge – duplicity in framing of charge – appellant claiming that the addition of the particulars relating to<br />

the wounding of the complainant in the robbery charge made it duplicitous – charge failing to include the words dangerous”<br />

and “offensive” to describe the weapons the robbers were armed with – effect of – whether the inclusion of one or more of<br />

the alternative modes of bringing a robbery charge made it duplicitous<br />

David Njuguna Wairimu v David Njuguna Wairimu ..................................................................................................................... 37<br />

Statutory power of sale - sale by public auction-where the suit property was sold to the second respondent through public<br />

auction-where the purchase price was paid after four days instead of the required 25% at the fall of the hammer and the<br />

balance within sixty days-whether the auctioneer diligently discharged his duties in exercising his discretion<br />

Marco Munuve Kieti v Official Receiver and Interim Liquidator Rural Urban Credit Finance & another ............................ 42<br />

Statutory power of sale - where the first respondent exercised the statutory power of sale and sold the appellant’s<br />

property to the second respondent by public auction-whether the first respondent was entitled to exercise the statutory<br />

power of sale-where the suit property was registered in the second respondent’s name-equity of redemption-whether the<br />

appellant’s equity of redemption was extinguished<br />

Marco Munuve Kieti v Official Receiver and Interim Liquidator Rural Urban Credit Finance & another ............................ 42<br />

CIVIL PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE<br />

Damages - mesne profits-where the second respondent sought the appellant be condemned to pay mesne profits to him for<br />

the occupation of the suit property-where the suit property was registered under the second respondent’s name-whether<br />

the second was entitled to the rent for the period of occupation<br />

Marco Munuve Kieti v Official Receiver and Interim Liquidator Rural Urban Credit Finance & another ............................ 42<br />

Judicial review - leave - application for leave to file for judicial review orders-whether the application for leave to apply<br />

for judicial review orders was within the statutory time-whether application for leave for judicial review orders would<br />

operate as stay-where the superior court ordered that the leave for judicial review application operate as stay-validity of<br />

application-<strong>Law</strong> Reform Act (cap 26) section 9 (3); Public Procurement and Disposal Act (Act No. 3 of 2005) section 100<br />

(1); Interpretation and General Provisions Act (cap 2) section 57; Judicature Act (cap 8) section 10<br />

<strong>Kenya</strong> Power and Lightning Company v NMG Company & 3 Others (Interested Parties) .......................................................39<br />

Stay - application for stay of proceedings and orders of the High Court pending hearing and determination of the intended<br />

appeal-whether the applicant demonstrated that the intended appeal was arguable and that it would be rendered nugatory<br />

unless a stay was granted-validity of application-Court of Appeal Rules rule 5 (2) (b)<br />

<strong>Kenya</strong> Power and Lightning Company v NMG Company & 3 Others (Interested Parties) ...................................................... 39<br />

Stay – stay in cases of appeal – stay of recovery of costs awarded to the respondent – appeal against conditional stay<br />

granted – delay in filing appeal – application to strike out – grounds that the appeal had been filed out of time and<br />

without leave of the court – certificate of delay having been issued by the deputy registrar – claims that the certificate of<br />

delay was not proper and could not be relied upon to explain the delay period – court considerations – whether the cases<br />

warranted striking out.<br />

Ratemo Oira t/a Ratemo Oira & Company Advocates v Blue Shield Insurance Co. Ltd ............................................................38<br />

Stay of execution – application for stay of execution of a judgment and decree by the High Court – application grounded<br />

under sections 3A & 3B of the Appellate Jurisdiction Act – applicant having disobeyed an earlier order by the High Court<br />

to deposit security in an interest earning account – overriding objective of the Appellate Jurisdiction Act- whether the<br />

applicant could rely on the overriding objective having failed to comply with the High Court’s ruling – notice of appeal<br />

relating to the main judgment and not the High Court’s ruling - whether applicant could rely on the overriding objective<br />

provisions having disobeyed the High Court’s ruling – whether non-compliance with the High Court ruling had a bearing<br />

on the application before the appellate court – Rule 5 (2) (b) Court of Appeal Rules and sections 3A & 3B of the Appellate<br />

Jurisdiction Act<br />

Hunker Trading Company Ltd v Elf Oil <strong>Kenya</strong> Ltd........................................................................................................................55<br />

Taxation – appeal – appeal against dismissal of an application for taxation by third party – power to order advocate<br />

to deliver cash account – delay in filing appeal – application to strike out – grounds that the appellant had no right of<br />

appeal – claims that the was no leave to appeal obtained – certificate of delay having been issued by the deputy registrar<br />

- computation of time within which the appeal should have been filed – whether the certificate of delay could be relied<br />

on – whether leave was required to file appeals from the decisions on originating summons.<br />

Ratemo Oira t/a Ratemo Oira & Company Advocates v Blue Shield Insurance Co. Ltd ............................................................38<br />

4 <strong>Issue</strong> <strong>12</strong>: April-June 2010

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!