02.11.2014 Views

Bench Bulletin - Issue 12 - Kenya Law Reports

Bench Bulletin - Issue 12 - Kenya Law Reports

Bench Bulletin - Issue 12 - Kenya Law Reports

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

KENYA LAW REPORTS<br />

BENCH BULLETIN<br />

DIGEST OF CASES FEATURED<br />

CONSTITUTIONAL LAW<br />

Constitutional right - allegation of violation of constitutional right-alleged violation being pleaded as an afterthought<br />

- effect of.<br />

Dennis Muthee Chokera v Republic ................................................................................................................................................. 35<br />

Constitutional right – violation of appellant’s right to be presented to the court upon arrest within 14 days of such arrest<br />

– appellant having been brought to court after the prescribed period of 14 days – where the appellant had failed to raise<br />

that issue both at his trial and in his first appeal – language - failure to interpret the language of the court – appellant<br />

claiming that the court record was not clear whether proceedings were interpreted to the appellant – remedy for breach<br />

of constitutional rights – whether a doubt was created as to the appellant’s understanding of the proceedings – whether<br />

he was precluded from raising a constitutional issue at any other stage of the proceedings – Constitution section 72(3)<br />

and 77(2)<br />

David Njuguna Wairimu v David Njuguna Wairimu ..................................................................................................................... 37<br />

Fundamental rights - rights of an accused person - right to a fair trial - right to be brought to court within a reasonable<br />

time-appellant being charged with murder - appellant having been arrested on February 7, 2007 and was taken to Court<br />

on February 9, 2007<br />

James Karoki Wangeci v Republic ................................................................................................................................................... 47<br />

CRIMINAL LAW - confessions-accused confessing to the offence during inquiry-statement under inquiry admitted after<br />

trial within a trial-effect of.<br />

Jackson Kyalo Munge v Republic ..................................................................................................................................................... 42<br />

CRIMINAL PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE<br />

Appeal – appellant charged for the offence of defilement and an alternative charge of indecent assault of a female –<br />

conviction on alternative charge -appeal against conviction on the alternative count and sentence for 10 years imprisonment<br />

– appeal on grounds that the main charge having been struck out an alternative charge could not be sustained-whether<br />

evidence on record could sustain the offence of defilement - whether the conviction and sentencing was proper – section<br />

144 and 145 (1) of the Penal Code<br />

M.B.O v Republic ................................................................................................................................................................................ 42<br />

Appeal – first and final appeal – duty as the first appellate court to reassess and re-evaluate such evidence and to reach its<br />

own independent conclusion – appeal against conviction and death sentence for the offence of murder – main ground that<br />

the case against the appellant was not proved beyond reasonable doubt – claims of contradictory evidence – whether the<br />

prosecution had proved its case beyond reasonable doubt – Penal Code (Cap 63) section 203 as read with section 204<br />

Josiah Afuna Angulu v Republic ....................................................................................................................................................... 44<br />

Appeal – second appeal – appeal against conviction and sentence for the offence of robbery with violence – grounds that the<br />

superior court failed to consider the defence – duty of the first appellate court – circumstances under which a superior court<br />

could rehash the conclusion of a lower court – whether this was objectionable – Penal Code section 296 (2) (Cap 63)<br />

David Njuguna Wairimu v David Njuguna Wairimu ..................................................................................................................... 37<br />

Appeal – second appeal - matters confined to a second appeal - appellant having been charged with the attempted<br />

defilement of a minor – where the first appeal to the superior court of records was dismissed – claims that the appellant’s<br />

defence was not considered – whether the evidence adduced was sufficient to sustain the conviction<br />

James Karoki Wangeci v Republic ................................................................................................................................................... 47<br />

Appeal - second appeal against conviction and sentence - the appellant was convicted on counts of defilement and child<br />

trafficking-where the appellant’s acquittal on the count of defilement was reversed to a conviction-whether the superior<br />

court had jurisdiction to reverse the trial court’s finding of not guilty to guilty-whether the evidence adduced was sufficient<br />

to secure conviction on both counts-whether the appeal had merit-Penal Code sections 260, 261; Sexual Offences Act<br />

sections 8 (3), 18 (1) (2); Criminal Procedure Code section 215; United Nations Protocol to Prevent, Suppress and Punish<br />

Trafficking in Persons, Article 3 (a)<br />

Kenneth Kiplangat Rono v Republic ............................................................................................................................................... 45<br />

Charge – reduction of charge - charge sheet having been changed from reading “defilement of a minor” to reading<br />

“attempted defilement of a minor” – whether this would prejudice the appellant – claims that the language of the court<br />

was not stated when the charge was change and there was no interpretation – compliance with section 214 of the Criminal<br />

Procedure Code (Cap 75) – court record showing that the appellant pleaded not guilty when the alternate charge was<br />

read to him – effect of - Criminal Procedure Code section 214<br />

James Karoki Wangeci v Republic Criminal Appeal 146 of 2008 ..................................................................................................47<br />

<strong>Issue</strong> <strong>12</strong>: April-June 2010<br />

5

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!