Bench Bulletin - Issue 12 - Kenya Law Reports
Bench Bulletin - Issue 12 - Kenya Law Reports
Bench Bulletin - Issue 12 - Kenya Law Reports
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
KENYA LAW REPORTS<br />
BENCH BULLETIN<br />
DIGEST OF CASES FEATURED<br />
Constructive provocation – appellant having argued with one of the witnesses prior to the incident – lack of evidence as<br />
to whether the deceased had been involved in the argument – whether this could be construed as constructive provocation<br />
– whether such provocation could be availed to the appellant<br />
Josiah Afuna Angulu v Republic ...................................................................................................................................................... 44<br />
Evidence - evaluation of evidence-duty of the first appellate court to evaluate the trial court’s evidence.<br />
Dennis Muthee Chokera v Republic ................................................................................................................................................ 35<br />
Exhibits- procedure for production of exhibits- need for an exhibit to be identified before being produced as evidencewhere<br />
an exhibit was irregularly produced-where the irregular production of the exhibit did not affect any ingredient of<br />
the offence- where the court could still have enter conviction without the weapon being produced as exhibit - whether the<br />
appeal could be allowed on that ground in circumstances<br />
Chris Kasamba Karani v Republic ................................................................................................................................................... 46<br />
Second appeal - appeal against conviction and sentence - appellant convicted of robbery with violence-appeal restricted<br />
to matters of law- circumstances under which an appellate court would interfere with the decision of the superior court-<br />
Criminal Procedure Code (Cap 75) section 361<br />
Chris Kasamba Karani v Republic ................................................................................................................................................... 46<br />
Trial process - judgment and sentencing-trial court required to receive mitigating circumstances after finding the<br />
appellant guilty before proceeding to pronounce sentence- mitigating circumstances on record would be of importance<br />
when assessing an appropriate sentence on appeal<br />
Chris Kasamba Karani v Republic ................................................................................................................................................... 46<br />
ELECTION LAW<br />
Conduct of elections – non-compliance with the law – the scope of section 28 of the National Assembly and Presidential<br />
Elections Act - section 28 of the National Assembly and Presidential Elections Act providing that irregularities in the conduct<br />
of an election will not vitiate the result unless the irregularities were so serious that the election was not in accordance<br />
with principles laid in the law or the irregularities affected the result- appellant asking the court to invoke section 28 on<br />
grounds that the acts alleged against the electoral body that conducted the elections did not affect the overall results of the<br />
elections – whether the anomalies found in Forms 16A and17A were so pervasive as to affect the entire election - whether<br />
these anomalies could be cured by section 28 of the National Assembly and Presidential Elections Act – whether election<br />
was conducted in accordance with principles laid down by the electoral law<br />
James Omingo Magara v Manson Onyongo Nyamweya & 2 others ............................................................................................. 49<br />
Election petition – appeal against High Court judgment – the High Court having nullified the election of the appellant as<br />
the Member of Parliament for the South Mugirango constituency on grounds that the election was not transparent, free and<br />
fair – the appellant having garnered the highest number of votes during the scrutiny and recount of votes – failure by the<br />
court to find the appellant guilty of an electoral offence - scrutiny and recount of the votes disclosed numerous irregularities<br />
among them unsigned unauthenticated Forms 16A, variation between Forms 16A and 17A, missing ballot boxes, broken<br />
ballot seals - the significance of Forms 16A – the effect of the failure by the presiding officer to sign or stamp Forms 16A<br />
without reasonable cause - Regulations 35A (5), 39, 40 (1) of the Presidential and Parliamentary Regulations<br />
James Omingo Magara v Manson Onyongo Nyamweya & 2 others ............................................................................................. 49<br />
Interpretation of statute - interpretation of electoral laws and regulations – the interpretation of electoral laws is aimed<br />
at conducting free and fair elections – circumstances when an election can be declared void - test to be applied by the<br />
court in determining validity of an election - meaning of free and fair elections – meaning of transparent elections – duty<br />
of the electoral body to promote free and fair election - Section 17A of the National Assembly and Presidential Elections<br />
Act - section 42A (c) of the Constitution<br />
James Omingo Magara v Manson Onyongo Nyamweya & 2 others ............................................................................................. 49<br />
Service – mode of service of an election petition – appeal – appeal against ruling by the High Court dismissing election<br />
petition on the ground that the petitioner had invoked the alternative mode of service under Section 20(1) (a) (iv) of the<br />
National Assembly and Presidential Elections Act without exercising first due diligence to serve the respondent personally<br />
– alternative mode of service having been effected within six days of filing the election petition - affidavit of service – High<br />
Court struck out the affidavit of service for having not been filed on time - whether an affidavit of service in an election<br />
must be filed in a prescribed manner – affidavit of service was filed after leave was granted by the court to file further<br />
affidavits to examine whether the 1st respondent had been served in accordance with the Act - whether the affidavit of<br />
service was erroneously struck out - Section 20 (1) (c) (iv) of the National Assembly and Presidential Elections Act<br />
Justus Mungumbu Omiti v Walter Enock Nyambati Osebe & 2 others ....................................................................................... 48<br />
6 <strong>Issue</strong> <strong>12</strong>: April-June 2010