02.11.2014 Views

Bench Bulletin - Issue 12 - Kenya Law Reports

Bench Bulletin - Issue 12 - Kenya Law Reports

Bench Bulletin - Issue 12 - Kenya Law Reports

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

KENYA LAW REPORTS<br />

BENCH BULLETIN<br />

DIGEST OF CASES FEATURED<br />

Constructive provocation – appellant having argued with one of the witnesses prior to the incident – lack of evidence as<br />

to whether the deceased had been involved in the argument – whether this could be construed as constructive provocation<br />

– whether such provocation could be availed to the appellant<br />

Josiah Afuna Angulu v Republic ...................................................................................................................................................... 44<br />

Evidence - evaluation of evidence-duty of the first appellate court to evaluate the trial court’s evidence.<br />

Dennis Muthee Chokera v Republic ................................................................................................................................................ 35<br />

Exhibits- procedure for production of exhibits- need for an exhibit to be identified before being produced as evidencewhere<br />

an exhibit was irregularly produced-where the irregular production of the exhibit did not affect any ingredient of<br />

the offence- where the court could still have enter conviction without the weapon being produced as exhibit - whether the<br />

appeal could be allowed on that ground in circumstances<br />

Chris Kasamba Karani v Republic ................................................................................................................................................... 46<br />

Second appeal - appeal against conviction and sentence - appellant convicted of robbery with violence-appeal restricted<br />

to matters of law- circumstances under which an appellate court would interfere with the decision of the superior court-<br />

Criminal Procedure Code (Cap 75) section 361<br />

Chris Kasamba Karani v Republic ................................................................................................................................................... 46<br />

Trial process - judgment and sentencing-trial court required to receive mitigating circumstances after finding the<br />

appellant guilty before proceeding to pronounce sentence- mitigating circumstances on record would be of importance<br />

when assessing an appropriate sentence on appeal<br />

Chris Kasamba Karani v Republic ................................................................................................................................................... 46<br />

ELECTION LAW<br />

Conduct of elections – non-compliance with the law – the scope of section 28 of the National Assembly and Presidential<br />

Elections Act - section 28 of the National Assembly and Presidential Elections Act providing that irregularities in the conduct<br />

of an election will not vitiate the result unless the irregularities were so serious that the election was not in accordance<br />

with principles laid in the law or the irregularities affected the result- appellant asking the court to invoke section 28 on<br />

grounds that the acts alleged against the electoral body that conducted the elections did not affect the overall results of the<br />

elections – whether the anomalies found in Forms 16A and17A were so pervasive as to affect the entire election - whether<br />

these anomalies could be cured by section 28 of the National Assembly and Presidential Elections Act – whether election<br />

was conducted in accordance with principles laid down by the electoral law<br />

James Omingo Magara v Manson Onyongo Nyamweya & 2 others ............................................................................................. 49<br />

Election petition – appeal against High Court judgment – the High Court having nullified the election of the appellant as<br />

the Member of Parliament for the South Mugirango constituency on grounds that the election was not transparent, free and<br />

fair – the appellant having garnered the highest number of votes during the scrutiny and recount of votes – failure by the<br />

court to find the appellant guilty of an electoral offence - scrutiny and recount of the votes disclosed numerous irregularities<br />

among them unsigned unauthenticated Forms 16A, variation between Forms 16A and 17A, missing ballot boxes, broken<br />

ballot seals - the significance of Forms 16A – the effect of the failure by the presiding officer to sign or stamp Forms 16A<br />

without reasonable cause - Regulations 35A (5), 39, 40 (1) of the Presidential and Parliamentary Regulations<br />

James Omingo Magara v Manson Onyongo Nyamweya & 2 others ............................................................................................. 49<br />

Interpretation of statute - interpretation of electoral laws and regulations – the interpretation of electoral laws is aimed<br />

at conducting free and fair elections – circumstances when an election can be declared void - test to be applied by the<br />

court in determining validity of an election - meaning of free and fair elections – meaning of transparent elections – duty<br />

of the electoral body to promote free and fair election - Section 17A of the National Assembly and Presidential Elections<br />

Act - section 42A (c) of the Constitution<br />

James Omingo Magara v Manson Onyongo Nyamweya & 2 others ............................................................................................. 49<br />

Service – mode of service of an election petition – appeal – appeal against ruling by the High Court dismissing election<br />

petition on the ground that the petitioner had invoked the alternative mode of service under Section 20(1) (a) (iv) of the<br />

National Assembly and Presidential Elections Act without exercising first due diligence to serve the respondent personally<br />

– alternative mode of service having been effected within six days of filing the election petition - affidavit of service – High<br />

Court struck out the affidavit of service for having not been filed on time - whether an affidavit of service in an election<br />

must be filed in a prescribed manner – affidavit of service was filed after leave was granted by the court to file further<br />

affidavits to examine whether the 1st respondent had been served in accordance with the Act - whether the affidavit of<br />

service was erroneously struck out - Section 20 (1) (c) (iv) of the National Assembly and Presidential Elections Act<br />

Justus Mungumbu Omiti v Walter Enock Nyambati Osebe & 2 others ....................................................................................... 48<br />

6 <strong>Issue</strong> <strong>12</strong>: April-June 2010

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!