TEAK PLANTATIONS IN NILAMBUR - Kerala Forest Research Institute
TEAK PLANTATIONS IN NILAMBUR - Kerala Forest Research Institute
TEAK PLANTATIONS IN NILAMBUR - Kerala Forest Research Institute
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
During the period 1967 to 1981, the mean total yield from 251 operations<br />
covering 8342 ha was 165m 3 ha -1 and MAI at 56 years was 2.954m 3 ha -1 year -1 .<br />
During the period 1982-94 the mean total yield from 117 operations covering<br />
4035 ha was 105m 3 and MAI at 51 years was 2.064 m 3 ha -1 year -1 . For<br />
comparison of the productivity between the two periods it is not enough to<br />
compare the total yield as the rotation ages are different. Therefore the MAI<br />
for the two periods is used for the comparison. The productivity, as observed<br />
from the MAI, is higher in the period 1967-81 than in the subsequent period<br />
1982-94. It may be noted that the variability in yield is more pronounced<br />
during the period 1982-94 than during 1967-1981.<br />
During the period 1967-1994, pooling the data from 372 plantations covering<br />
12536 ha, the mean age of final felling became 53 years. The MAI at 53 years<br />
was found to be 2.854m 3 ha -1 yr -1 which is the mean productivity of teak<br />
plantations in Nilambur Divisions. This estimated mean yield is used in the<br />
pro fitability analysis.<br />
In Tables 3.1 to 3.3, the maximum and minimum yields in each type of work<br />
are shown. The minimum and maximum are extreme values which are not<br />
used for further analysis. For this, the yields representing the lowest and<br />
highest ten percent of area were estimated when yields were arranged in the<br />
ascending order. These are the mean yields in the lowest decile and the<br />
highest decile of the entire data. The yields in the lowest decile and highest<br />
decile are hereafter called 'low yield' and 'high yield' and they are used later in<br />
the profitability analysis. Table 3.4 shows the estimates of mean yields<br />
representing the entire data and those in the lowest and highest deciles. The<br />
estimated MAI in the lowest decile is 0.973 m 3 ha -1 yr -1 and that in the highest<br />
19