05.11.2014 Views

Information and communication technologies (ICTs) and ... - ITU

Information and communication technologies (ICTs) and ... - ITU

Information and communication technologies (ICTs) and ... - ITU

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

only environmental impact considered <strong>and</strong> was mainly from electricity use. Equipment manufacturing was<br />

not included.<br />

The main results showed that broadcast DTT has a smaller carbon footprint per viewer-hour than VoD for<br />

average sized audiences, but not with small audiences or for homes using an aerial amplifier. The largest<br />

environmental impact from watching television is from the consumer equipment. This amounts to 76 per<br />

cent of the total for DTT <strong>and</strong> 78 per cent <strong>and</strong> 37 per cent for VoD using desktop <strong>and</strong> laptop computers<br />

respectively. The trend for larger screens could increase this, although there is a parallel increase in viewing<br />

on small mobile devices. Programme-making contributes 12 per cent to 35 per cent.<br />

Results were sensitive to the viewer numbers per display. Doubling the number of viewers per display<br />

reduces the carbon footprint by 44 per cent for digital terrestrial television. For VoD, there was large<br />

uncertainty in the energy consumption data for the content delivery network <strong>and</strong> the Internet. However,<br />

this does not affect the main outcomes.<br />

Figure 11 shows the results for the full end-to-end chain with the same four scenarios. The production<br />

component, which is common to all, has the same value in all scenarios. The DTT distribution component<br />

includes an aerial amplifier <strong>and</strong> the average value for DTT distribution was used. Scenarios 1-3 have a<br />

carbon footprint of 0.088 kg CO2e/viewer-hour, 0.086 kg CO2e/viewer-hour <strong>and</strong> 0.086 kg CO2e/viewerhour<br />

respectively whereas Scenario 4 has a carbon footprint of only 0.030 kg CO2e/viewer-hour.<br />

The consumption component is the largest in all scenarios although the lower average energy consumption<br />

of laptop PCs is reflected in the results.<br />

Figure 11. Overall comparison of four different scenarios. The error bars show the 95 per cent<br />

confidence interval.<br />

72

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!