07.11.2014 Views

DAILY AIR TEMPERATURE AND PRESSURE SERIES ... - BALTEX

DAILY AIR TEMPERATURE AND PRESSURE SERIES ... - BALTEX

DAILY AIR TEMPERATURE AND PRESSURE SERIES ... - BALTEX

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>DAILY</strong> <strong>AIR</strong> <strong>TEMPERATURE</strong> <strong>AND</strong> <strong>PRESSURE</strong> <strong>SERIES</strong> FOR STOCKHOLM (1756–1998) 195<br />

following equation was used to convert the observed height (H obs )ofthemercury<br />

column (in sw.inch) to the true height in sw.inch (H sw. inch ):<br />

H sw. inch = f · (H obs − 25.3) + 25.3 ,<br />

(3a)<br />

where<br />

(<br />

f = 1 + a ) (<br />

π · r 2 )<br />

i<br />

= 1 +<br />

A π · (Ri 2 − ro 2) . (3b)<br />

In Equation (3b), a = area of upper mercury surface, A = area of lower<br />

mercury surface, r i = inner radius of glass tube, r o = outer radius of glass tube<br />

and R i = inner radius of mercury container. The inner and outer radii of the glass<br />

tube were measured in the X-ray image (Figure 10), and were found to be 3 mm<br />

and 4 mm respectively. The entire mercury container can unfortunately not be seen<br />

in the image because it is covered by a brass shield which cannot be removed. R i<br />

can therefore not be determined from the X-ray image. One can only say that R i<br />

can take any value between about 13 and 28 mm. This corresponds to values of the<br />

factor f in Equation (3) between 1.06 and 1.01. We decided to use R i = 28 mm, i.e.<br />

the maximum possible radius, giving f = 1.01, because it is likely that Ekström<br />

wanted to minimize the influence of level changes of the lower mercury surface.<br />

We applied Equation (3a) with f = 1.01 to all observed barometer values<br />

1756–1858 and then we converted these values to mm. This seems to be relevant<br />

for all cases when the Ekström barometer was used. If another barometer was used<br />

some short periods (which certainly happened, see Section 5.5.), another correction<br />

might have been more appropriate for these periods. With no explicit information<br />

available about any possibly different barometers, however, we found no reason to<br />

make other choices of correction.<br />

5.3.3. Reduction to 0 ◦ C and Conversion to hPa<br />

Reduction to 0 ◦ C, for the period 1756–1858, and at the same time conversion to<br />

pressure in hPa was made using the standard equation:<br />

p 0 = g 45 · ρ 0 · H T,mm · (1 − γ · T)· 10 −5 , (4)<br />

where p 0 = air pressure reduced to 0 ◦ CinhPa,g 45 = 9.80665 m · s −2 (normal<br />

gravity acceleration), ρ 0 = 13.5951 · 10 3 kg · m −3 (density of mercury at 0 ◦ C),<br />

H T,mm = corrected length of the mercury column (in mm) at temperature T (in<br />

◦ C), γ = 1.82 · 10 −4 K −1 (thermal expansion coefficient of mercury) ⋆ and T =<br />

barometer temperature (in ◦ C).<br />

We assumed that the Ekström barometer was correct at 0 ◦ C. This assumption<br />

is arbitrary, but it is the common case for modern barometers. If we introduced a<br />

⋆ The thermal expansion coefficient of brass (1.9 · 10 −5 K −1 ) was omitted because the maximum<br />

error of omitting this coefficient for the short brass scale on the Ekström barometer is about<br />

±0.03 hPa, which is negligible in this context.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!