10.11.2014 Views

Computational engineering for wind-exposed thin-walled structures

Computational engineering for wind-exposed thin-walled structures

Computational engineering for wind-exposed thin-walled structures

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Computational</strong> <strong>engineering</strong> <strong>for</strong><br />

<strong>wind</strong>-<strong>exposed</strong> <strong>thin</strong>-<strong>walled</strong> <strong>structures</strong><br />

Ansgar Halfmann, Ernst Rank<br />

Lehrstuhl für Bauin<strong>for</strong>matik, TU München<br />

Markus Glück, Michael Breuer, Franz Durst<br />

Lehrstuhl für Strömungsmechanik,<br />

Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg<br />

Jürgen Bellmann, Casimir Katz<br />

SOFiSTiK AG, München<br />

März 2001<br />

Bauin<strong>for</strong>matik<br />

BAUINGENIEUR− UND VERMESSUNGSWESEN<br />

TECHNISCHE UNIVERSITÄT MÜNCHEN


Prof.Dr.rer.nat. Ernst Rank<br />

Lehrstuhl für Bauin<strong>for</strong>matik<br />

TECHNISCHE<br />

UNIVERSITÄT<br />

MÜNCHEN<br />

Fakultät für Bauingenieur- und Vermessungswesen<br />

Technische Universität München<br />

Arcisstr. 21<br />

D-80290 München<br />

email: rank@bv.tum.de Telefon: int++49 (89) 289 23048<br />

www: http://www.inf.bauwesen.tu-muenchen.de/ Telefax: int++49 (89) 289 25051


<strong>Computational</strong> <strong>engineering</strong> <strong>for</strong><br />

<strong>wind</strong>-<strong>exposed</strong> <strong>thin</strong>-<strong>walled</strong> <strong>structures</strong><br />

Ansgar Halfmann, Ernst Rank<br />

Lehrstuhl für Bauin<strong>for</strong>matik, TU München<br />

Markus Glück, Michael Breuer, Franz Durst<br />

Lehrstuhl für Strömungsmechanik,<br />

Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg<br />

Jürgen Bellmann, Casimir Katz<br />

SOFiSTiK AG, München<br />

März 2001


<strong>Computational</strong> <strong>engineering</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>wind</strong>-<strong>exposed</strong><br />

<strong>thin</strong>-<strong>walled</strong> <strong>structures</strong><br />

Ansgar Halfmann 1 , Ernst Rank 1 , Markus Gluck 2 ,Michael Breuer 2 ,Franz<br />

Durst 2 ,Jurgen Bellmann 3 , and Casimir Katz 3<br />

1 Lehrstuhl fur Bauin<strong>for</strong>matik, Technische Universitat Munchen, 80290 Munchen,<br />

Germany<br />

2 Lehrstuhl fur Stromungsmechanik, Universitat Erlangen-Nurnberg,<br />

91058 Erlangen, Germany<br />

3 SOFiSTiK AG, 81541 Munchen, Germany<br />

Abstract. In this paper a computer-aided simulation approach <strong>for</strong> uid-structure<br />

interaction of <strong>wind</strong>-<strong>exposed</strong> <strong>structures</strong> is presented. In the center of our software<br />

architecture is the geometric model of the structure, from which a nite element<br />

mesh <strong>for</strong> the structure and a nite volume mesh <strong>for</strong> the uid are derived. The<br />

attention is concentrated to <strong>thin</strong>-<strong>walled</strong> <strong>structures</strong> like membranes and <strong>thin</strong> shells<br />

composed of light and exible materials. The interaction of uid and structure is<br />

eected by <strong>wind</strong>-induced vibrations and causes large elastic de<strong>for</strong>mations of the<br />

structure. A powerful simulation tool is provided by couplingtwo codesdeveloped<br />

<strong>for</strong> ow simulation and structural dynamics by a fully implicit coupling algorithm.<br />

Results of three-dimensional simulations of uid-structure interaction <strong>for</strong> several<br />

test cases as well as <strong>for</strong> a real-life example will be presented.<br />

1 Introduction<br />

During the last few years much progress has been achieved to integrate<br />

analysis and design in civil <strong>engineering</strong> [9]. The computer-aided design process<br />

starts by setting up a geometric model being used <strong>for</strong> the denition<br />

of all structural properties as well as <strong>for</strong> the loads on the construction.<br />

From this geometric model a computational model is derived as the basis<br />

<strong>for</strong> the following dimensioning of the construction. This computer-aided<br />

<strong>engineering</strong> process has to support<br />

eciently the primary goals of any<br />

civil <strong>engineering</strong> design, i.e. the development<br />

of constructions satisfying<br />

the requirements of safety during<br />

their whole lifetime, resisting all<br />

expected inuences they might be<br />

<strong>exposed</strong> to. Considering <strong>for</strong> example<br />

light textile constructions like<br />

the convertible shade roof <strong>for</strong> a<br />

large court of the Prophet's Mosque<br />

in Madinah consisting of several Fig. 1. Convertible shade roof [10]


2 Ansgar Halfmann et al.<br />

large umbrellas (Fig. 1 [10]), the most demanding <strong>engineering</strong> task is to<br />

dimension the construction so that it will resist <strong>wind</strong> loads. Following the<br />

Davenport-Wind-Load-Chain an assumed local <strong>wind</strong> prole <strong>for</strong> a given terrain<br />

can be established according to the European Design Code EC 1 [5].<br />

This <strong>wind</strong> distribution causes a pressure eld on the structure. If simplied,<br />

conventional load assumptions <strong>for</strong> this pressure distribution are made, the<br />

<strong>structures</strong> may be strongly over-designed. Yet, also an under-design with the<br />

danger of a collapse may result from this simplied procedure, as the mutual<br />

inuence of neighbouring constructions could change the <strong>wind</strong> pressure eld<br />

dramatically. There<strong>for</strong>e, todays standard of practice are time-consuming and<br />

costly experiments in <strong>wind</strong> tunnels. A model of the construction is considered<br />

and <strong>wind</strong> pressure elds on its surface are measured to be used <strong>for</strong> later<br />

numerical structural analysis. One of the major drawbacks of this mixed computational<br />

and experimental approach is the diculty toquickly change the<br />

geometry of the model construction <strong>for</strong> the <strong>wind</strong> tunnel experiment. There<strong>for</strong>e,<br />

it would be highly desirable to have a'numerical <strong>wind</strong> tunnel' available,<br />

being directly integrated in the civil <strong>engineering</strong> design and analysis process,<br />

and enabling to investigate a structure also under the inuence of neighbouring<br />

constructions. Several steps in this direction have been per<strong>for</strong>med by the<br />

authors in a joint research project during the past two years and will be<br />

presented in this contribution.<br />

2 Software architecture<br />

The software architecture shown in Fig. 2 is inuenced by the idea of a loose<br />

coupling strategy based on highly specialized and well evaluated simulation<br />

codes, each developed <strong>for</strong> the special eld of the interacting system. In a<br />

rst step, the structural model is dened, using a classical CAD environment<br />

onaPCoraworkstation. Toconsider<br />

dierent stress distributions<br />

in a membrane, it is possible to<br />

compute the geometric shape of<br />

pure membrane <strong>structures</strong> in a<br />

<strong>for</strong>mnding process [2]. Thereby<br />

the de<strong>for</strong>med shape of the structure<br />

under dead load is computed<br />

by a nite element analysis starting<br />

from an inital geometry. Using<br />

special membrane elements<br />

and assuming an initial stiness<br />

caused by isotropic prestressing<br />

PC / workstation<br />

supercomputer<br />

STL-file<br />

ICEM-CFD<br />

fluid-simulation<br />

FASTEST-3D<br />

Geometrical Model<br />

+boundary conditions<br />

AutoCAD / SOFiPLUS<br />

<strong>for</strong>mfinding process<br />

MpCCI<br />

SOFiMESH<br />

DO_MESH<br />

structure-simulation<br />

ASE<br />

creates<br />

PC / workstation TECPLOT / Explorer Wingraf / Animator<br />

CDBASE<br />

Fig. 2. Software structure<br />

and neglecting any bending stiness, the de<strong>for</strong>med shape will lead to the<br />

soap lm <strong>for</strong>m with its constant isotropic stress distribution. All geometric<br />

in<strong>for</strong>mation is stored in a database describing a b-rep (boundary repre-


<strong>Computational</strong> <strong>engineering</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>wind</strong>-<strong>exposed</strong> <strong>thin</strong>-<strong>walled</strong> <strong>structures</strong> 3<br />

sentation) model completed by in<strong>for</strong>mation concerning material properties<br />

and boundary conditions [9]. For the structural part of the analysis system<br />

this project database represents a central module. All programs used<br />

<strong>for</strong> the structural simulation have access to the in<strong>for</strong>mation stored in the<br />

database. The geometric model <strong>for</strong> the uid dynamic part is also derived<br />

from the CAD model completed by boundary conditions and discretized as a<br />

block-structured three-dimensional grid being adequate to the nite volume<br />

technique. Due to extremely high computational requirements, the numerical<br />

simulation of the dynamic uid-structure interaction is per<strong>for</strong>med on a<br />

high-per<strong>for</strong>mance computer [8] in the next step. Thereby the data transfer between<br />

the two simulation codes, each running on dierent nodes/processors,<br />

is per<strong>for</strong>med via a common geometric model using a suitable coupling interface<br />

[1]. Finally, the results can be evaluated and visualized by powerful<br />

postprocessors on a workstation or on a PC.<br />

3 Coupling algorithm<br />

The uid-structure interaction is described by the structural de<strong>for</strong>mations<br />

as response to <strong>wind</strong> <strong>for</strong>ces, resulting in a modication of the uid ow domain.<br />

The coupling is per<strong>for</strong>med by a partitioned solution approach [3]. The<br />

<strong>Computational</strong> Fluid Dynamics (CFD) simulations are per<strong>for</strong>med by a nite<br />

volume based code [4] solving the Reynolds-Averaged-Navier-Stokes (RANS)<br />

equations using a two-equation k- model. It is adapted to moving grids<br />

by an Arbitrary Lagrangian Eulerian (ALE) <strong>for</strong>mulation. For the <strong>Computational</strong><br />

Structure Dynamics (CSD) the dynamic non-linear structural response<br />

(large displacements/small de<strong>for</strong>mations) is described by the equations of<br />

motion based on a nite element approach and an implicit time-stepping<br />

procedure [11]. For more details concerning the simulation codes we refer<br />

to [6]. The time-dependent simulation process is controlled by the coupling<br />

algorithm shown in Fig. 3. The<br />

solution is based on an iteration<br />

Fluid Structure<br />

procedure between the CFD<br />

and CSD simulation until convergence<br />

is reached wi<strong>thin</strong> each<br />

Solver<br />

inner iteration<br />

time-step. Thereby the nodal<br />

loads as input <strong>for</strong> the CSD<br />

Fluid solution<br />

outer FSI iteration<br />

simulation are computed from<br />

<strong>wind</strong> loads<br />

the results of the CFD simulation<br />

Solver<br />

time step<br />

(pressure and wall shear<br />

Structural solution<br />

stresses). The updated boundary<br />

displacements<br />

geometry is based on the structural<br />

displacements as a result of<br />

converged final solution<br />

the CSD simulation. In cases of<br />

large structural de<strong>for</strong>mations an<br />

Fig. 3. Coupling algorithm


4 Ansgar Halfmann et al.<br />

under-relaxation of the update of the boundary geometry was found to improve<br />

the convergence signicantly. A reduction of the number of iterations<br />

wi<strong>thin</strong> each time-step can be obtained by a predictor-corrector scheme [6].<br />

In<strong>for</strong>mations concerning the data transfer between the dierent numerical<br />

grids can be found in [7].<br />

4 Numerical examples<br />

The coupling procedure presented in the previous section was applied to<br />

several test cases. In the following the results of two elementary systems will<br />

be discussed with respect to dierent parameters <strong>for</strong> spatial and temporal<br />

discretization. Based on this, the coupled application was used to simulate<br />

the uid-structure interaction of a complex membrane structure.<br />

4.1 Vertical plate in a resting uid<br />

The rst example describes a temporarily loaded rectangular plate clamped at<br />

the lower boundary in a closed cavity of a resting uid. The dimensions of the<br />

exible plate pictured in Fig. 4 are length/width/thickness = 1.0/0.4/0.06 m.<br />

For the material properties a polyester with<br />

a modulus of elasticity of E = 2.5 MPa, a<br />

Poisson's ratio of =0:35 and a density of<br />

S = 2550 kg/m 3 is assumed. The density<br />

and dynamic viscosity of the uid are F =<br />

1kg/m 3 and F =0:2 Pa. Using these parameters,<br />

a laminar ow is expected. During<br />

the rst ve time-steps a constant load<br />

is applied in x-direction. After removing the<br />

Fig. 4. System conguration<br />

load the plate executes oscillations induced by the initial deection damped<br />

by the surrounding uid ow.<br />

In a rst simulation the inuence of the time-step size was investigated.<br />

The uid domain was discretized by 1650 hexaeder elements, yielding 10<br />

quadrilateral elements to describe the interface. For the structural simulation<br />

a surface mesh of 8 elements was chosen. Both surface discretizations are<br />

shown in Fig. 5. Due to the boundary conditions <strong>for</strong> the uid simulation<br />

the results of the coupled three-dimensional simulation shows a quasi twodimensional<br />

behavior. Fig. 6 points out the computed displacement of the<br />

upper boundary of the plate <strong>for</strong> simulations with three dierent time-step<br />

sizes. The amplitude of the plate oscillation is damped by theambient uid.<br />

For the dierent time-step sizes only small deviations could be identied.<br />

There<strong>for</strong>e, t 1 =0:025 s was chosen <strong>for</strong> the following simulations.<br />

The dependence of the displacement on dierent spatial discretizations<br />

is depicted in Fig. 8. Starting again from a discretization of 1650 hexaeder<br />

elements <strong>for</strong> the uid domain (10 quadrilaterals on the interface, Fig. 7) a


<strong>Computational</strong> <strong>engineering</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>wind</strong>-<strong>exposed</strong> <strong>thin</strong>-<strong>walled</strong> <strong>structures</strong> 5<br />

250<br />

CFD<br />

18 nodes,<br />

10 elements<br />

CSD<br />

15 nodes,<br />

8 elements<br />

Fig. 5. Discretization of the interface<br />

displacement upper boundary [mm]<br />

200<br />

150<br />

100<br />

50<br />

0<br />

−50<br />

−100<br />

−150<br />

t 1 = 0:025 s<br />

t 2 = 0:0125 s<br />

t 3 = 0:00625 s<br />

−200<br />

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5<br />

time [s]<br />

Fig. 6. Displacement <strong>for</strong> dierent t<br />

uni<strong>for</strong>m renement was per<strong>for</strong>med in two levels which leads to 13,200<br />

and 105,600 hexaeder elements and 40 or 160 quadrilaterals <strong>for</strong> the interface,<br />

respectively. The coarsest grid <strong>for</strong> the CSD simulation consisting of only 2<br />

elements is also shown in Fig. 7. Uni<strong>for</strong>m renement yields surface meshes of<br />

8 or 32 quadrilateral elements <strong>for</strong> the structure simulation, respectively.<br />

CFD<br />

18 nodes,<br />

10 elements<br />

CSD<br />

6nodes,<br />

2 elements<br />

Fig. 7. Initial interface discretization<br />

displacement upper boundary [mm]<br />

300<br />

250<br />

200<br />

150<br />

100<br />

50<br />

0<br />

−50<br />

−100<br />

−150<br />

CFD10=CSD 2<br />

CFD40=CSD 8<br />

CFD160=CSD 32<br />

−200<br />

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1<br />

time [s]<br />

Fig. 8. Displacement <strong>for</strong> dierent interface<br />

discretizations<br />

Fig.8points out the insucient accuracy of the results corresponding to<br />

the initial interface discretizations and the good agreement of the transient<br />

displacements achieved with the rened meshes. In particular the CSD mesh<br />

consisting only of 2 elements <strong>for</strong> the y-direction is too coarse to obtain useful<br />

results.<br />

4.2 Vertical plate under a sudden <strong>wind</strong> gust<br />

The geometry and material properties of the second test case are the same<br />

as be<strong>for</strong>e. Fig. 9 shows a cutting plane through the uid domain which is<br />

open with an inlet (left boundary), an outlet (right boundary), and symmetric<br />

boundary conditions at the top as well as in z-direction. At the beginning<br />

of the coupled simulation the uid suddenly accelerates and adopts


6 Ansgar Halfmann et al.<br />

immediately a constant inowvelocity<br />

ofU1 = 10 m/s being equivalent<br />

to a Reynolds number of Re L =50.<br />

As a consequence the structural oscillations<br />

are induced by the saltus<br />

of the uid velocity and reach a<br />

stationary de<strong>for</strong>mation state after a<br />

certain time. Fig. 10 shows again the<br />

displacement of the upper boundary<br />

of the plate <strong>for</strong> various timestep<br />

sizes. The interface discretizations<br />

comply to the grids pictured in<br />

Fig. 5. Only minor distinctions could<br />

be identied <strong>for</strong> the dierent time<br />

discretizations. Furthermore, the in-<br />

uence of the spatial interface discretization<br />

was investigated using<br />

the grids shown in Fig.11 and per<strong>for</strong>ming<br />

an uni<strong>for</strong>m renement of<br />

two levels <strong>for</strong> the CSD grid whereas<br />

the mesh <strong>for</strong> the uid domain remains<br />

unchanged. It is again obvious<br />

displacement upper boundary [mm]<br />

U<br />

8<br />

70<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

y<br />

1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111<br />

0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000<br />

1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111<br />

0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000<br />

A<br />

Fig. 9. System conguration<br />

0<br />

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5<br />

time [s]<br />

B<br />

L<br />

t 1 = 0:025 s<br />

t 2 = 0:0125 s<br />

t 3 = 0:00625 s<br />

t 4 = 0:003125 s<br />

t 5 = 0:0015625 s<br />

Fig. 10. Displacement <strong>for</strong> dierent t<br />

that the bending oscillations of the plate cannot be represented suciently<br />

accurate by a CSD mesh with only two elements in y-direction, see Fig. 12.<br />

x<br />

CFD<br />

18 nodes,<br />

10 elements<br />

CSD<br />

9nodes,<br />

4 elements<br />

Fig. 11. Initial interface discretization<br />

displacement upper boundary [mm]<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

CFD10=CSD 4<br />

CFD10=CSD 6<br />

CFD10=CSD 8<br />

0<br />

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5<br />

time [s]<br />

Fig. 12. Displacement <strong>for</strong> dierent CSD<br />

interface discretizations<br />

4.3 Tent roof<br />

Fig. 13 shows a screenshot of the CAD-environment representing the geometric<br />

model of a real-life structure as a starting point <strong>for</strong> the simulation.


<strong>Computational</strong> <strong>engineering</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>wind</strong>-<strong>exposed</strong> <strong>thin</strong>-<strong>walled</strong> <strong>structures</strong> 7<br />

The shape of the structure is a result of the <strong>for</strong>mnding process sketched<br />

in Section 2 and species a textile roof being positioned in front of an oce<br />

building. A material of glass-bre synthetics with a thickness of 1.5 mm, a<br />

modulus of elasticity ofE =3000MPa, and a shear modulus of G =1500<br />

MPa is assumed. The structure is 24 m long and shows a width between 3<br />

m and 8.5 m. The boundary of the block-structured three-dimensional CFD<br />

grid on the interface and the CSD surface grid are shown in Fig. 14 and 15.<br />

Due to the fact that the k- model produces non-physical results <strong>for</strong> such<br />

complex geometries the CFD simulations were per<strong>for</strong>med neglecting turbulence<br />

in this rst step. The velocity distribution of the assumed <strong>wind</strong> gust and<br />

the displacement as structural response are pictured <strong>for</strong> four dierent timesteps<br />

in Fig. 16. The gust leads to a maximal displacement in z-direction of<br />

z max =31cm.<br />

3536 nodes,<br />

3400 elements<br />

Fig. 14. CFD interface discretization<br />

1409 nodes,<br />

1311 elements<br />

Fig. 13. Geometry of the tent roof<br />

Fig. 15. CSD interface discretization<br />

Fig. 16. Velocity distributions and diplacements of four dierent time-steps<br />

(t 1 =2:0 s,t 2 =3:0 s,t 3 =4:36 s and t 4 =4:46 s)


8 Ansgar Halfmann et al.<br />

5 Conclusions<br />

The partitioned solution approach has been investigated <strong>for</strong> the simulation of<br />

uid-structure interaction of light civil <strong>engineering</strong> constructions under <strong>wind</strong><br />

load. Be<strong>for</strong>e the outlined concept could be a practically used procedure, it will<br />

be necessary to incorporate more elaborate turbulence modeling such as largeeddy<br />

simulation, per<strong>for</strong>m more numerical tests and compare the numerical<br />

results with veried experimental data. If thus sucient condence is gained<br />

in this simulation technique, it can be an application of high-per<strong>for</strong>mance<br />

computing with signicant impact on <strong>engineering</strong> practice.<br />

Acknowledgements<br />

The work was nanced by the Bayerische Forschungsstiftung in the Bavarian<br />

Consortium of High-Per<strong>for</strong>mance Scientic Computing, FORTWIHR (III).<br />

The simulations were partially carried out on the Hitachi SR8000-F1 at the<br />

LRZ Munchen [8]. This support is gratefully acknowledged.<br />

References<br />

1. Ahrem, R., Hackenberg, M.G., Post, P., Redler, R., Roggenbuck, J. (2000)<br />

MpCCI { Mesh Based Parallel Code Coupling Interface. Institute <strong>for</strong> Algorithms<br />

and Scientic Computing (SCAI), GMD, http://www.mpcci.org/<br />

2. Bellmann, J. (1998) Membrantragwerke und Seifenhaut { Unterschiede in der<br />

Formndung. Bauingenieur, 3/98, 118{123<br />

3. Cebral, J.R. (1996) Loose Coupling Algorithms <strong>for</strong> Fluid-Structure Interaction.<br />

Ph.D.-Thesis, George Mason University Fairfax, Virginia<br />

4. Durst, F., Schafer, M. (1996) A Parallel Block{Structured Multigrid Method<br />

<strong>for</strong> the Prediction of Incompressible Flows. Int. J. Num. Methods Fluids 22,<br />

549{565<br />

5. EUROCODE 1 (1995) Basis of Design and Actions on Structures Part 2-4: Actions<br />

on Structures - Wind Actions. European Committee <strong>for</strong> Standardization<br />

Ref. No. ENV 1991-2-4<br />

6. Gluck, M., Breuer, M., Durst, F., Halfmann, A., Rank, E. (2000) Computation<br />

of Fluid-Structure Interaction on Lightweight Structures. Proceedings of<br />

Fourth International Colloquium on Blu Body Aerodynamics & Applicastions,<br />

Bochum, To appear in J. of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics<br />

7. Halfmann, A., Rank, E., Gluck, M., Breuer, M., Durst, F. (2000) A Partitioned<br />

Solution Approach <strong>for</strong> the Fluid-Structure Interaction of Wind and<br />

Thin-Walled Structures. Proceedings of IKM 2000, Weimar<br />

8. http://www.lrz-muenchen.de/services/compute/hlrb/.<br />

9. Rank, E., Halfmann, A., Rucker, M., Katz, C., Gebhard, S. (2000) Integrierte<br />

Modellierungs- und Berechnungssoftware fur den konstruktiven Ingenieurbau:<br />

Systemarchitektur und Netzgenerierung. Bauingenieur, Februar 2000, 60{66<br />

10. Sonderkonstruktionen und Leichtbau GmbH (1993) The Work of SL.<br />

Leinfelden-Oberaichen<br />

11. SOFiSTiK AG (2000) ASE{Handbuch. Munchen

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!