10.11.2014 Views

Target Shooter 1

Target Shooter 1

Target Shooter 1

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Left to right - Berger 155.5, Lapua 155 Scenar, HBC BJD, New Sierra, Berger VLD, PMP,<br />

Bullet i 7<br />

Berger 155.5 Fullbore<br />

Lapua 155 Scenar<br />

155 HBC BJD<br />

(Australia)<br />

Sierra 155 Palma (2156)<br />

Berger 155 VLD<br />

155 PMP (South Africa)<br />

Sierra 155 Palma (2155)<br />

Hornady 155 A-Max<br />

Old Sierra, Hornady A-Max<br />

Average<br />

G7 BC<br />

Retained<br />

Velocity<br />

(1,000yd)<br />

fps<br />

Wind<br />

Deflection<br />

(600yd)<br />

Inches /<br />

MOA<br />

Wind<br />

Deflection<br />

(1,000yd)<br />

Inches / MOA<br />

0.988 0.237 1,302 27.3 / 4.4 91.0 / 8.67<br />

0.988 0.236 1,298 27.4 / 4.4 91.6 / 8.73<br />

0.989 0.236 1,297 27.4 / 4.4 91.6 / 8.73<br />

1.018 0.229 1,257 28.5 / 4.5 95.9 / 9.14<br />

1.039 0.225 1,228 29.2 / 4.6 98.5 / 9.42<br />

1.041 0.224 1,227 29.3 / 4.6 99.2 / 9.45<br />

1.092 0.214 1,161 31.1 / 4.9 106.7 / 10.17<br />

1.100 0.212 1,152 31.4 / 5.0 108.3 / 10.32<br />

Figure 3. Ballistic performance comparison for 8 Fullbore bullets starting out at 3,000<br />

fps MV under standard sea level atmospheric conditions (59°F, 29.53 inches mercury<br />

pressure).<br />

Figure 3<br />

the ‘old’ Sierra Palma MK<br />

(#2155) and the Hornady<br />

A-Max move another 15 to<br />

17 inches sideways in the<br />

wind and struggle to remain<br />

supersonic, close enough<br />

to 1,120 fps to see the<br />

latter have some bullets in<br />

a string risk dropping below<br />

this velocity at the bottom<br />

end of a typical MV spread<br />

allied to slightly more<br />

onerous atmospheric<br />

conditions, such as lower<br />

temperature and/or higher<br />

pressure. Note that<br />

performance variations in<br />

the hypothetical 10mph<br />

crosswind are much<br />

reduced at 600yd, the<br />

difference between the<br />

‘best’ and ‘worst’<br />

equating to just over a<br />

half-MOA compared to<br />

three times that amount<br />

at 1,000yd, so having the<br />

optimal bullet in ballistics<br />

terms confers much less<br />

advantage to the shorterrange<br />

shooter.<br />

So now that we have<br />

these results, how do we<br />

know what to make of<br />

them? The sterile wind<br />

deflection in a constant<br />

10 mph crosswind<br />

performance metric is kind<br />

of useful, but what does<br />

it mean in terms of points<br />

in a match? Is there a<br />

real, practical difference<br />

between say 91” and 95.9”<br />

of wind deflection (the 1st<br />

and 4th bullets respectively<br />

in the list), or is that just lost<br />

in the noise? To attempt to<br />

shed light on this question,<br />

I’ll turn to modelling. The<br />

results of a model are only<br />

as accurate as their inputs.<br />

The bullet performance can<br />

be modelled accurately, but<br />

<strong>Target</strong> <strong>Shooter</strong> 61

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!