Frequency domain seismic forward modelling: A tool for waveform ...
Frequency domain seismic forward modelling: A tool for waveform ...
Frequency domain seismic forward modelling: A tool for waveform ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Figure 1.1: A Discrete representation of the <strong><strong>for</strong>ward</strong> <strong>modelling</strong> problem. The representation<br />
is schematic; the assumption of two dimensions is not required at this<br />
stage, nor is this ordering of the node points necessary. The waveeld (either a<br />
scalar or a vector quantity) is sampled at each of the n x n z node points.<br />
manner, although the diagonal block submatrices of S ~<br />
are then no longer identical.<br />
The same comment applies to the 2:5 , D method of Song and Williamson (1995),<br />
in which a new diagonal block would be generated <strong>for</strong> each wavenumber considered.<br />
By examining the solutions to equation (1.5) when the components of the<br />
source vector, f i are replaced by a Kronecker delta, ij , it is clear that the columns<br />
of S ~ ,1 must contain the discrete approximations to the Green's functions. Thus,<br />
h<br />
S ,1 = g<br />
(1)<br />
g (2)<br />
~<br />
::: g (nxnz) i<br />
; (1.6)<br />
where the column vectors g (j) approximate the discretized Green's function <strong>for</strong> an<br />
impulse at the jth node. If the original physical problem is exactly reciprocal with<br />
,1<br />
respect to an interchange of source and receiver elements, then both S and S ~ ~<br />
must be symmetric (not Hermitian) matrices. [In implementation S is often not<br />
~<br />
perfectly symmetric when certain (unphysical) absorbing boundary conditions are<br />
implemented (Pratt and Worthington, 1990). This does not cause any problems].<br />
27