Save PDF - Manutencoop
Save PDF - Manutencoop
Save PDF - Manutencoop
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
4.8 Acquisition of Gruppo Sicura S.r.l.<br />
On 30 December 2008, MFM S.p.A. acquired 80% of the quota capital of Gruppo Sicura S.r.l., a company based in<br />
Vicenza that controls a group of about ten small companies. These companies create and supply services, products<br />
and systems for protection against fire and for the safety of persons and assets, mainly serving the retail market<br />
(SMEs).<br />
The structure of the group acquired is described in para. 2.4.<br />
Accounting effects of the acquisition<br />
This transaction is a business combination. Accordingly, the purchase method envisaged in IFRS 3 was adopted by<br />
the Group to record the transaction.<br />
The total cost of the acquisition was Euro 15,329 thousand, including Euro 184 thousand in purchase-related<br />
costs (legal expenses, financial consultancy and antitrust procedures).<br />
The purchase consideration was paid to the sellers on completion of the transaction.<br />
The contract also envisages:<br />
• payment to the sellers of an additional price (earn-out) for the 80% interest acquired. This amount is payable, upon<br />
request from the sellers between 1 July 2014 and 30 June 2015, on condition that the normalised consolidated<br />
EBITDA of Gruppo Sicura for 2013 exceeds its normalised EBITDA for 2007;<br />
• grant of a put option (by the buyer to the sellers, exercisable between 30 June 2014 and 30 June 2015) and a<br />
call option (by the sellers to the buyer, exercisable between 1 July 2015 and 1 July 2017) for the transfer of the<br />
remaining 20% of the quota capital.<br />
The additional price for the 80% interest acquired and the exercise price of the options over the residual 20%<br />
will both be determined with reference to the updated valuation of the investment at the time the sellers request<br />
payment in the first case, and at the option exercise date in the second case.<br />
The updated valuation of the investment will be determined as a multiple (determined in the contract or, if MFM<br />
S.p.A. is listed at that time, by reference to its average market price over the preceding three months) of the<br />
normalised consolidated EBITDA for 2013, less the consolidated net financial position of Gruppo Sicura S.r.l. as of<br />
31/12/2013.<br />
Pursuant to current accounting standards, the present value of the exercise price (if applicable) of the put option<br />
and of the additional price payable (earn-out) should have been recognised as a financial liability in these financial<br />
statements, had the amounts concerned been determinable on a reliable basis.<br />
The Parent Company's management believes it likely that the earn-out will be payable (EBITDA 2013 greater than<br />
EBITDA 2007), but, on preparing the consolidated financial statements as of 31 December 2008, management did<br />
not have enough information to be able to estimate reliably the amount of such purchase price adjustment or the<br />
exercise price (if applicable) of the put option.<br />
Accordingly, the related financial liability has not been recognised.<br />
At this time, it is objectively impossible to make a reliable estimate of the above two amounts due to a number of<br />
factors listed below:<br />
• the significant time interval between now and the date on which such amounts will be determined,<br />
• the large number of significant variables involved in the valuation concerned,<br />
• the poor predictability of these significant variables, especially with regard to the implied multiple to be used,<br />
• the need for MFM management to become familiar with the normal business drivers in a sector that is new to the<br />
Group.<br />
In order to provide full and complete information about this transaction, it is possible to determine the total<br />
financial liability that would have been recognised in these financial statements in the absence of the above<br />
uncertainties. This amount would have been equal to the present value of the difference between the updated<br />
valuation of 100% of the investment (calculated using the 2013 data and the applicable multiple) and the amount<br />
paid in 2008 for 80% of the investment (Euro 15,145 thousand).<br />
Accordingly, should the updated valuation of the investment be the same as its current value, the financial liability<br />
associated with the earn-out would be zero, while the present value of that associated with the option would be<br />
about Euro 3.8 million. If, on the other hand, consistent with the expectations of Group management, the financial<br />
and operating performance of the Sicura Group leads to a higher updated valuation for the investment, then the<br />
liability to be recognised would be greater by the present value of such difference.<br />
153