18.11.2014 Views

Lisa Kohler, MD - AkronCantonMDNews

Lisa Kohler, MD - AkronCantonMDNews

Lisa Kohler, MD - AkronCantonMDNews

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

legal ease<br />

Expecting Inspection<br />

By Cathy A. Sloane, Esq.<br />

The physician’s day in the office was<br />

going fairly smoothly until the practice<br />

manager announced an unexpected visitor;<br />

a Medicare auditor was seated in the<br />

conference room. When asked if there was<br />

a problem, the auditor gave no specific reason<br />

prompting this surprise visit. Rather,<br />

she explained that she would be auditing<br />

patient charts for adequacy of documentation<br />

on claims billed to Medicare. The<br />

on-site inspection of records would<br />

begin today.<br />

This is a fictional story, but it illustrates<br />

the discomfort that physicians face when<br />

surprised with an audit from an insurance<br />

carrier. The questions are many. Is<br />

this a routine inspection? Have there<br />

been patient complaints? Has the medical<br />

practice been flagged by irregular billing<br />

patterns? Worse yet, could this be a<br />

whistle-blower investigation?<br />

Although an external audit can certainly<br />

be random and routine, physicians are<br />

acutely aware that Medicare and other<br />

insurance carriers often conduct audits to<br />

investigate suspected fraud or abusive billing<br />

practices. Physicians cannot avoid all audits<br />

like this one, but there are actions that you<br />

can take to decrease that probability.<br />

AUDIT PREVENTION<br />

The Department of Health and Human<br />

Service and the Office of Inspector General<br />

(OIG) have asked physicians to voluntarily<br />

develop and implement compliance programs.<br />

A compliance program integrates<br />

the various complex laws and regulations<br />

into your claims-processing procedures.<br />

Ideally, the goal is to prevent fraud and other<br />

wrongful behavior.<br />

A comprehensive compliance program<br />

will include a coding compliance policy.<br />

Although an external audit can certainly be random<br />

and routine, physicians are acutely aware that<br />

Medicare and other insurance carriers often conduct<br />

audits to investigate suspected fraud or abusive billing<br />

practices.<br />

This policy is a “meeting of the minds”<br />

between the physicians, billing staff, and<br />

insurance carriers that claims will be<br />

processed with agreed values (codes).<br />

Importantly, the coding compliance policy<br />

should establish a plan for both the internal<br />

monitoring and independent reviews of<br />

your coding and billing functions.<br />

Internal monitoring is your day-today<br />

assessment of operations to ensure that<br />

processes are working as they are intended.<br />

For example, internal staff with coding<br />

expertise might routinely monitor a sample<br />

of records for “evaluation & management”<br />

(E&M) coding accuracy. The frequency and<br />

type of internal monitoring will vary based<br />

on the dynamics and specialty of the practice.<br />

Staff should not forget to document their<br />

monitoring activities according to policy.<br />

Independent reviews are chart audits<br />

conducted by a certified coder at the<br />

request of the physician. Too often overlooked,<br />

independent reviews are vital to<br />

your compliance program in that they are<br />

non-biased, external controls for assessing<br />

any weaknesses in your coding and billing<br />

processes. Should an investigative audit by<br />

an insurance carrier later reveal inaccurate<br />

coding, the independent review by a certified<br />

coder can demonstrate your reasonable<br />

efforts to comply with ethical and legal<br />

business practices and thus avoid a fraud<br />

claim basis.<br />

Physicians are advised to schedule an independent<br />

review with a certified coder at<br />

least annually. Independent reviews should<br />

be scheduled more frequently if there have<br />

been significant additions to the medical<br />

staff, changes in documentation methods,<br />

or increase in rejected claims.<br />

CONCLUSION<br />

Insurance carriers have become stricter<br />

in enforcing accurate coding and billing<br />

as substantiated by documentation in the<br />

patient record. Random audits are not<br />

uncommon. However, physicians can take<br />

steps to minimize the likelihood of a payer<br />

audit, and mitigate possible sanctions, by<br />

establishing a compliance program.<br />

An effective compliance program will<br />

lessen the risk of fraud and abuse by identifying<br />

and addressing high risk areas.<br />

Self-monitoring and scheduling an independent<br />

review by a certified coder are<br />

compliance efforts deserving of your special<br />

attention. Your healthcare attorney can<br />

locate a coding specialist familiar with your<br />

practice needs.<br />

NOTE: This general summary of the law<br />

should not be used to solve individual problems<br />

since slight changes in the fact situation may<br />

require a material variance in the applicable<br />

legal advice.<br />

Cathy A. Sloane is a Nurse Attorney<br />

and Certified Coding Specialist Physicianbased<br />

with the law firm, K rugliak,<br />

Wilkins, Griffiths & Dougherty Co., LPA<br />

in Canton. ■<br />

GREATER AKRON/CANTON M.D. NEWS JANUARY-FEBRUARY 2008 | 35

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!