2012 ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING Reports ... - Karate Canada
2012 ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING Reports ... - Karate Canada
2012 ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING Reports ... - Karate Canada
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Meeting Minutes (November 25, 2011)<br />
8.1.2 Discussion<br />
8.1.2.1 Paul - $20K for database?<br />
RK – this is a sport <strong>Canada</strong> project, will be a database to incorporate members;<br />
provinces and clubs will be able to utilize<br />
8.1.2.2 Sato – how is membership fee income calculated<br />
RK – explanation was given<br />
8.1.2.3 Joy – differences in revenue from Nationals 2010-2011?<br />
Other income is tax rebate?<br />
RK – 2011 reflects only event registration, previously was all other income.<br />
Reporting practices were changed to reflect income.<br />
Yes, other income is tax rebate.<br />
8.1.2.4 Paul – in 2010, $26K increase in operating costs and salaries from $50K-$90K?<br />
RK – 2010 was only for high performance, 2011 includes an Executive Director,<br />
admin includes operations, day-to-day, rent, management,<br />
there was no office prior.<br />
8.1.2.5 Paul – TC decrease in revenue?<br />
RK – is linked to 2 events in that year, now expense of nationals is all included<br />
8.1.2.6 Uchiage – How much budget was for US Open, WKF, PKF, Paris Open?<br />
RK – direct athlete funding varies with level, registration. Numbers can be sent to<br />
individuals who request this, i.e. $8K for WKF Athlete funding and $6K for<br />
Paris Open, the number and level of athletes vary and is dependant on status,<br />
athletes can possibly receive more money in smaller events as budgeted support<br />
amount is divided among less people.<br />
8.1.2.7 Zvonko – who decides how much money will be given?<br />
RK – last year was decided by the Head coach, this year was done by the High<br />
Performance Committee; ultimately it’s an operational decision,<br />
determined year to year<br />
8.1.2.8 Motion to accept financial statements of 2011 made by Dragan Kljenak; all in favour.<br />
8.1.2.8.1 Motion held<br />
Recorded by Joshua Drury –Unapproved.<br />
9. Appointment of auditors<br />
9.1 Motion to reappoint auditors Daniel Piché, 2nd Joe Alfonso; all in favour<br />
9.2 Motion held<br />
10. By-Law amendments<br />
10.1 Motion in the AGM package (pg 5); requires a 2/3 vote in favour<br />
10.2 Description: re-organization of the committee structure so as to increase efficiency of<br />
governance and improve structure. Does not affect the ability to add ad-hoc committees.<br />
They are standing committees.<br />
10.2.2 Motion to accept: Norma Foster, 2nd Derek Ryan<br />
10.2.3 Discussion:<br />
10.2.3.1 Joy Ang – all 7 are standing committees?<br />
RK – Yes, Board appointed<br />
10.2.3.2 Paul – Operational committees only?<br />
RK – Board will approve, which means all are to be Board of Director appointed<br />
10.2.4 The current By-laws section 10.01 “Board will appoint vs...”<br />
sport related committees<br />
10.2.4.1 The authority of the committees is dictated by their respective Terms of reference<br />
10.2.4.2 Paul – Operational Committee should read “standing committee”<br />
10.2.4.2.1 Motion made to amend the wording, not 2nd, not passed<br />
10.2.5 Motion to accept the amendment as written: 6 delegates in favour, none against<br />
10.2.5.1 Motion held. Will come into effect once approved by Industry <strong>Canada</strong><br />
Page 5