18.11.2014 Views

2012 ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING Reports ... - Karate Canada

2012 ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING Reports ... - Karate Canada

2012 ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING Reports ... - Karate Canada

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Meeting Minutes (November 25, 2011)<br />

8.1.2 Discussion<br />

8.1.2.1 Paul - $20K for database?<br />

RK – this is a sport <strong>Canada</strong> project, will be a database to incorporate members;<br />

provinces and clubs will be able to utilize<br />

8.1.2.2 Sato – how is membership fee income calculated<br />

RK – explanation was given<br />

8.1.2.3 Joy – differences in revenue from Nationals 2010-2011?<br />

Other income is tax rebate?<br />

RK – 2011 reflects only event registration, previously was all other income.<br />

Reporting practices were changed to reflect income.<br />

Yes, other income is tax rebate.<br />

8.1.2.4 Paul – in 2010, $26K increase in operating costs and salaries from $50K-$90K?<br />

RK – 2010 was only for high performance, 2011 includes an Executive Director,<br />

admin includes operations, day-to-day, rent, management,<br />

there was no office prior.<br />

8.1.2.5 Paul – TC decrease in revenue?<br />

RK – is linked to 2 events in that year, now expense of nationals is all included<br />

8.1.2.6 Uchiage – How much budget was for US Open, WKF, PKF, Paris Open?<br />

RK – direct athlete funding varies with level, registration. Numbers can be sent to<br />

individuals who request this, i.e. $8K for WKF Athlete funding and $6K for<br />

Paris Open, the number and level of athletes vary and is dependant on status,<br />

athletes can possibly receive more money in smaller events as budgeted support<br />

amount is divided among less people.<br />

8.1.2.7 Zvonko – who decides how much money will be given?<br />

RK – last year was decided by the Head coach, this year was done by the High<br />

Performance Committee; ultimately it’s an operational decision,<br />

determined year to year<br />

8.1.2.8 Motion to accept financial statements of 2011 made by Dragan Kljenak; all in favour.<br />

8.1.2.8.1 Motion held<br />

Recorded by Joshua Drury –Unapproved.<br />

9. Appointment of auditors<br />

9.1 Motion to reappoint auditors Daniel Piché, 2nd Joe Alfonso; all in favour<br />

9.2 Motion held<br />

10. By-Law amendments<br />

10.1 Motion in the AGM package (pg 5); requires a 2/3 vote in favour<br />

10.2 Description: re-organization of the committee structure so as to increase efficiency of<br />

governance and improve structure. Does not affect the ability to add ad-hoc committees.<br />

They are standing committees.<br />

10.2.2 Motion to accept: Norma Foster, 2nd Derek Ryan<br />

10.2.3 Discussion:<br />

10.2.3.1 Joy Ang – all 7 are standing committees?<br />

RK – Yes, Board appointed<br />

10.2.3.2 Paul – Operational committees only?<br />

RK – Board will approve, which means all are to be Board of Director appointed<br />

10.2.4 The current By-laws section 10.01 “Board will appoint vs...”<br />

sport related committees<br />

10.2.4.1 The authority of the committees is dictated by their respective Terms of reference<br />

10.2.4.2 Paul – Operational Committee should read “standing committee”<br />

10.2.4.2.1 Motion made to amend the wording, not 2nd, not passed<br />

10.2.5 Motion to accept the amendment as written: 6 delegates in favour, none against<br />

10.2.5.1 Motion held. Will come into effect once approved by Industry <strong>Canada</strong><br />

Page 5

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!