18.11.2014 Views

Pit Pattern Classification in Colonoscopy using Wavelets - WaveLab

Pit Pattern Classification in Colonoscopy using Wavelets - WaveLab

Pit Pattern Classification in Colonoscopy using Wavelets - WaveLab

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

5.2 Results<br />

<strong>Pit</strong> <strong>Pattern</strong> Type I II III-L III-S IV V<br />

k-NN<br />

I 67 10 7 0 15 0<br />

II 43 26 12 0 17 0<br />

III-L 37 3 44 0 15 0<br />

III-S 33 0 50 0 16 0<br />

IV 33 8 8 0 49 0<br />

V 24 12 8 0 56 0<br />

SVM<br />

I 51 10 16 2 20 0<br />

II 17 36 19 0 22 3<br />

III-L 20 11 44 0 20 3<br />

III-S 25 8 33 0 33 0<br />

IV 7 14 20 1 52 3<br />

V 16 16 8 0 48 12<br />

Table 5.11: Result distribution matrices for BBCB for 6 classes (<strong>Pit</strong> pattern images)<br />

total classification result was 100% for the k-NN classifier as well as for the SVM classifier.<br />

In the six classes case the classification result was 100% for the k-NN classifier and 100%<br />

for each separate class. The result achieved with the SVM classifier is even better with<br />

an overall classification result of 100% and classification results for each separate class<br />

between 99% and 100%.<br />

The result distribution matrix for the two classes case is a diagonal matrix, conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />

100’s only on the ma<strong>in</strong> diagonal and zero at all other positions <strong>in</strong> the matrix. In the six<br />

classes case all the entries on the ma<strong>in</strong> diagonal are very close to 100.<br />

Accord<strong>in</strong>g to table 5.6 the best test results for the tests with the pit pattern images were<br />

obta<strong>in</strong>ed us<strong>in</strong>g the feature extractors “Subband energy” and “Subband variance”. The feature<br />

vector dimensions are s = 32, 23 for the k-NN classifier and s = 45, 29 for the SVM<br />

classifier. Additionally the k-value for the k-NN classifier differs very much between the<br />

two classes case and the six classes case, with k = 3 and k = 33, respectively.<br />

For the test with the Outex images, these parameters are very similar as we can see from<br />

table 5.7. But the feature vector dimensions as well as the k-values for the k-NN classifier<br />

are lower <strong>in</strong> general. The feature vector dimensions for the classifiers are s = 1, 33 for the<br />

k-NN classifier and s = 4, 31 for the SVM classifier. The k-value for the k-NN classifier are<br />

very similar between the two classes case and the six classes case, with k = 2 and k = 1,<br />

respectively.<br />

In figure 5.5 we see that for the two classes case the overall classification results for pit<br />

pattern images <strong>in</strong> conjunction with the k-NN classifier are better for choices for k between<br />

1 and 40 and values for s between 22 and 35. But more <strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g are the figures for the<br />

75

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!