18.11.2014 Views

Pit Pattern Classification in Colonoscopy using Wavelets - WaveLab

Pit Pattern Classification in Colonoscopy using Wavelets - WaveLab

Pit Pattern Classification in Colonoscopy using Wavelets - WaveLab

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

5.2 Results<br />

(a) All classes<br />

(b) Non-neoplastic<br />

(c) Neoplastic<br />

Figure 5.6: Results for the BBCB method (2 classes, SVM, pit pattern images)<br />

5.2.4 Pyramidal decomposition (WT)<br />

In contrast to the previous two methods, regard<strong>in</strong>g the tests with the pit pattern images,<br />

this method achieved the best classification result us<strong>in</strong>g only the R-channel of the pit pattern<br />

images (i.e. the <strong>in</strong>formation stored <strong>in</strong> the color channels for green and blue has been<br />

discarded).<br />

As we can see <strong>in</strong> table 5.3, <strong>in</strong> the two classes case the best result obta<strong>in</strong>ed for the pit<br />

pattern images was 70% us<strong>in</strong>g the SVM classifier. The best result achieved with the k-NN<br />

classifier was a bit lower, with a percentage of correctly classified images of 62%. Therefore,<br />

with this method, the SVM classifier aga<strong>in</strong> outperforms the k-NN classifier. However, it is<br />

<strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g that <strong>in</strong> contrast to the previous two methods the neoplastic images seem to get<br />

significantly more accurately classified than the non-neoplastic ones. This property might<br />

be <strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g for future extensions, s<strong>in</strong>ce by comb<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g this method with another method<br />

which classifies the non-neoplastic images more accurately, we could possibly expect better<br />

overall classification results.<br />

In the six classes case aga<strong>in</strong> the SVM classifier outperforms the k-NN classifier with a<br />

classification result of 56% compared to 45% and the misclassification rates for pit pattern<br />

types III-S and V aga<strong>in</strong> are very high, just like <strong>in</strong> the previous method.<br />

77

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!