20.11.2014 Views

jepta 1987 06-1 - European Pentecostal Theological Association

jepta 1987 06-1 - European Pentecostal Theological Association

jepta 1987 06-1 - European Pentecostal Theological Association

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

EPPA BULLETI N<br />

BULLETIN OF THE<br />

EUROPEAN<br />

PENTECOSTAL<br />

THEOLOG I CAC<br />

ASSOCIATION<br />

VOL VI NO, 1<br />

<strong>1987</strong>


P , ART1 CLE<br />

HOW Public are Public Testimonies?<br />

A Short Reflection on a Liturgical Practice<br />

by Jean-Daniel PlUss<br />

Many of the free churches of the pietistic<br />

tradition are acquainted with the practice of testifying<br />

at public meetings. <strong>Pentecostal</strong>s from their beginning<br />

have been very conscious of the impact personal<br />

testimonies can have on church life in general and on<br />

missionary activity in particular. They understand a<br />

. witness to the power of the Moly Spirit to be a christian<br />

mandate to the world (~cts 1:B). It is therefore not<br />

surprising that early pentecostal publications were<br />

careful to underline any aspect demonstrating the public<br />

and accessible nature of religious experience.(l)<br />

The logic for bringing an intimate experience of<br />

the Transcendent to the market place of opinions is, as<br />

such, easy to formulate. <strong>Theological</strong>ly, the grace of God<br />

is recognized as a free and priceless gift which compels<br />

the witness to share its descriptian for the benefit of<br />

all, and also in order that he can come to terms with his<br />

own impressions. In other words, the public sharing of a<br />

testimony can be understood as the hermeneutic response<br />

to an experience which the believer ideally knows to have<br />

its roots outside himself, Furthermore, it seems<br />

inconceivable to think of a non-public testimony, The<br />

question, though, arises whether or not public telling<br />

automatically leads to public understanding. What should<br />

be public by nature is not necessarily public in<br />

practice. Three aspects of the testimonial practice need<br />

to be considered specifically if the queation of the<br />

title is to be answered. Theae aspects focus on the<br />

communicative triangle consisting of the sender, the<br />

message, and the receiver. The first aspect can be<br />

formulated in the following question: How true is the<br />

witness to himself? More specifically, in what way can<br />

self-deception interfere with the contents of the<br />

narration? The second aspect concerns the question, how.<br />

can the use of language promote or hinder the understanding<br />

of religious values. Are certain language games<br />

unable to qualify for public consumption? And the third<br />

aspect to be examined is the role of the audience. What<br />

does llpublicityll imply?<br />

The Problem of self-~sce~tion<br />

Probably the easiest criteria for the discoverv of<br />

self-deception in testimonial narratives is the<br />

"Who speaks?" The testimony as such speaks for itself. It<br />

is through 'Ithe irruption of something higher" that the<br />

witness feels compelled to testify. If the witness<br />

intends to speak through his testimony then he brings a<br />

foreign element into khe narrative. As Raimundo PANIKKAR<br />

puts it,<br />

I do not bear witness to the truth of my faith if I<br />

proclaim it in order to be a witness . . . O f<br />

course falsehood is alao possible here, As long as<br />

the audience believes the teatimony of the witness,<br />

he bears true witness - ex opere operantis - but he<br />

ceases to do so when the audience discovers that he<br />

- rather than the testimony itself - intends to<br />

speak, to bear witness. In fact, the w i l l to bear<br />

witness implies wanting to show . . . to convert<br />

him because I myself am convinced that the contents<br />

of my testimony are proper for him too . . . the<br />

purpose is no longer the passive blossoming of a<br />

grace that the audience freely discovers, but the<br />

active communication of a value . . . (2)<br />

The winning force of a spontaneous testimony is not<br />

problematic, buk the pre-meditated proclamation in the<br />

disguise of a intuitive telling poses difficulties,<br />

Interprstative comments are therefore rare in spontaneous<br />

testimonies. If they are present, they indicate that the<br />

witness has already passed a pre-reflective stage, for<br />

instance, by virtue of having testified to the same


experience on several occasions, or by their transmission<br />

to writing. Nota bene: interpretative comments do not<br />

invalidate a testimony, but they make a critical reading<br />

more important.<br />

The question "Who speaks?" can shed more light on<br />

inauthentic testimonies of grace from another angle,<br />

namely in the form in which it relates to a thir'd party,<br />

as the Latin roots testis and tri-stans already Indicate.<br />

A testimony is not a dialectical activity between two<br />

parties, rather it is a witness to transcendence which<br />

may be religious or simply institutional as in the<br />

practice of oath .taking. Now if the witness does not<br />

admit the existence of a third party, then the<br />

possibility of self-deception is very real. Alphonse De<br />

WAELHENS gives, from a psychoanalytic viewpoint, two<br />

examples where triple inter-subjectivity is thwarted.(3)<br />

The first case applies to the schizophrenic person, for<br />

whom there cannot be an address to a third person, due to<br />

the difficulties of already speaking as a self.(4) The<br />

second example applies to the paranoiac for whom the<br />

third party is his own self, for he remains psychologically<br />

at the mirror-stage and reacts aggressively to<br />

any deviation of his perception of himself. If asked who<br />

speaks, he would answer "Me, who elselft For him that<br />

means that all truth is his truth. In testifying he<br />

actually makes apodictic statements in which any form of<br />

ambiguity is excluded.(5) But it is ambiguity that<br />

characterizes testimony and bestows unpretentious power<br />

to its speech. After all, to testify is to be involved in<br />

an act of faith. Signs of ambiguity refer to the<br />

awareness of the third party. Phrases like "1 asked<br />

myself,tt "I wondered," or I t i t dawned on mett are typical<br />

pointers to such inter-subjectivity.<br />

It is generally assumed that testimonies<br />

emphatically claim only one interpretation of truth. That<br />

this is not the case is illustrated by the early<br />

pentecostal testimonies of healing in which the medical<br />

profession stands in an ambivalent position. On the one<br />

hand, the real physician is Jesus, on the other hand<br />

medical terminology is used to describe the worsening of<br />

the initial situation and doctors are invited ta verify<br />

miraculous healings. (6) Indeed such testimonies are not<br />

incoherent, but reflect the divided character of human<br />

existence and the delicate enterprise of placing moral<br />

commitment between strongly held beliefs and constantly<br />

emerging model8 with new formulations of what is held to<br />

be true. It follows that the function of testimony for<br />

the Itmapping of a life worldtt fulfills a pivotal role<br />

especially in a secular and pluralist society. As a<br />

conclusion it can be suggested that the ambivalent<br />

character of a testimony, if it is shared in a public<br />

context and is open ,to a public critique, can lend<br />

veracity to the act of communicating a religious<br />

experience. Ambiguity and truth are not necessarily<br />

diametrically opposed,<br />

The Problem of Language Use<br />

If a testimony is truly communicated publicly, it<br />

w i l l he expressed in a language game understandable to<br />

all. It Is not so easy to do so for at least two reasons.<br />

First, a religious experience always evolves around a<br />

disclosure that reveals a surplus of meaning. <strong>Theological</strong>ly,<br />

khis can be described as a disclosure of<br />

grace, The witness testifies to an event that enlarged<br />

his horizon of understanding . Linguistically, such an<br />

experience is described poetically. (7) The insight gained<br />

cannot ho rlescrlhed in a flatly descriptive way.<br />

Metaphors are used as illustrations of that which seems<br />

odd but true.(R) From a positive paint of view there is<br />

a universally ncknowledged and commonly understood way of<br />

expresrslng the religious, It takes the form of<br />

narratives, The bnuic structure of a narrative with its<br />

plot, tensions, and resolutions can be understood by<br />

everyone. Xt i~ no accident that the Christian Gospel is<br />

essentially a nt;ary. If a testimony is truly public it<br />

w l l l mo~t I tkely t;ake the form of a narrative. From a<br />

negakive point; of' vltsw, tho use of poetic language for


describing disclosures of the transcendent can lead to<br />

the well-known problems evolving around "God-talk." This<br />

leads us to the second problem of language use.<br />

The secularization of western society has brought<br />

about a separation between religious language and the<br />

language of common use. Whereas in the Middle Ages the<br />

world view was governed by all embracing religious<br />

convictions, the man of the twentieth century differentiates,<br />

for example, between scientific, social, and<br />

private views. In other words the witness can no longer<br />

take it for granted that formerly common religious lingo<br />

is still being understood. In its form, a testimony can<br />

sound like a "category mistake" when human questions are<br />

met in terms of a transcendent reference, that is, when<br />

an (apparently) non-religious question is answered<br />

religiously. What should be avoided, therefore, is an<br />

unintelligible leap from one language game (and the human<br />

experiences it describes) to another. Edward<br />

SCHILLEBEECKX states:<br />

The missionary task of christianity and the<br />

transition from non-christian to christian thus<br />

confront us with the need for an explicitly<br />

non-religious context of experience within which it<br />

Is possible to listen meaningfully to christian<br />

talk about God in a secularized world.(9)<br />

In one sense this radical statement clearly suggests to<br />

contextualize faith to an experience of meaning, and that<br />

this correlation has to be so fundamental as to be<br />

accessible to all human questions relating to the meaning<br />

of life. The narrative and everyday character of<br />

testimonies seems suitable in this respect, as long as<br />

testimonies do not hide behind a wall of religious<br />

stereotypes. A statement like, "The Lamb of God brought<br />

me to the foot of Golgotha," can hardly be described as<br />

publicly accessible, but the simple story how faith in<br />

God through the example of Jesus changes one's own life<br />

might be understandable. In summary, the message<br />

conveyed, as the second element of the communicative<br />

triangle, can only be of public value to the extent that<br />

it is presented in an accessible code,<br />

What are the Claims of the Audience?<br />

A testimony is by definition addressed to an<br />

audience. It follows that the receivers of the<br />

testimonial message are endowed with an active<br />

communicative role. They are expected to respond as a<br />

sign that the message has been understood. In order to<br />

ascertain the dialogue between sender and receiver a<br />

twofold pact needs to be made if the testimony is to be<br />

truly public.<br />

The first has been called the "autobiographical<br />

act, l1 (10) In an autobiographical communication (as in a<br />

testimony) there is, according to Philippe LEJEUNE, a<br />

generally agreed upon iden'tity between the author and the<br />

narrator, as well as between the narrator and the<br />

protagonist of the story. This basic presupposition makes<br />

an autobiographical account meaningful to the public. The<br />

pact is a warrant of truthfulness. Now, what has been<br />

said concerning self-deception makes the elaboration of<br />

the pact necessary; namely, the warrant of truthfulness<br />

provided by the audience, It takes the form of a public<br />

trial, because the notion of trial is semantically<br />

inherent to the notion of testimony,<br />

The one who testifies reports an event, he gives a<br />

narration, Those who hear the witness must decide whether<br />

or not they can believe the veracity of the facts told.<br />

For the witness it is not enough to state what he has<br />

tlseen,ll he must also give account of its truthfulness. As<br />

such, testimony is therefore always at the service of<br />

j udgmenk ,<br />

This trial is charncterized by a party dispute; the<br />

pleading for one opinion against the other is a<br />

phenomsnon of moat human situations. "We cannot claim to<br />

have cer2:al,n?;y but only probability, It writes Paul<br />

RICCOEUR, !land the probable is only pursued through a<br />

struggle of ~pinlon,~~(ll) This is especially the case<br />

with startemenl;s of faith, The critical element of a


trial, however, does not necessarily debunk the<br />

testimony. It may also enhance its value by acclamation.<br />

The testimony receives an exterior dimension through the<br />

.judgment of its hearers, without which it cannot be truly<br />

public, nor do justice as a doxological expression of<br />

belief.<br />

In other words, testimonial , practice in church<br />

should involve the community - for it is a community of<br />

interpretation. The role of the christian community (and<br />

by implication also that of the world) is, negatively, to<br />

question the testimony in view of the witness' life and<br />

the message of the Gospel. (e.g. Does the false testimony<br />

meet the test of conviction?) Positively, the community<br />

can appreciate a testimony if it reflects the ultimate<br />

testimony, that is, the testimony of life and total<br />

commitment of Jesus Christ.<br />

A final remark on the public nature of testimonies<br />

will bring us back to the early days of <strong>Pentecostal</strong>ism.<br />

As the movement took roots in the western world it<br />

proclaimed its new found freedom in Christ across<br />

institutional barriers and in public places because it<br />

could generally not afford its own architecturally<br />

designed church buildings.(12) The testimonies were<br />

shared on truly public grounds such as parks, public<br />

meeting places and factory halls. Although the<br />

<strong>Pentecostal</strong>s religious practice was claimed to be<br />

esoteric, their language of experience (reflecting<br />

various social milieus) was not.<br />

Furthermore, the argument for publicity has also a<br />

biblical reason. William EVERETT puts it like this,<br />

"Biblical faith gives God a specific character and<br />

address. God has a 'dwelling place I described variously<br />

as 'most high, heaven, heavenly kingdom, heavenly court,<br />

or throne. This spatiality may strike sophisticates as<br />

quaint, unless they realize that the biblical authors are<br />

claiming that God dwells in perfect public - a place of<br />

light, of open disclosure, of persuasive truth, of<br />

judgment in the light of all the facts.I1(l3) To this<br />

statement one could add the familiar notion in the Old<br />

Testament of "God's presence dwelling among his people,"<br />

or the New Testament equivalent: Itthe Word became flesh<br />

and dwelt among us, full of grace and truthu (John 1:14).<br />

EVERETT advocates another reason for paying<br />

attention to the public realm.(l4) It arises as a<br />

contrast from the fallen human condition which retreats<br />

into privation, a place of isolation and darkness,<br />

selfish coercion and death. Ironically, the pluralistic<br />

concept of the "publict1 in a secular world becomes a<br />

symbol of wholeness and salvation.<br />

Jean-Daniel PLUESS<br />

Meuelatrasse 45<br />

CH - 8032 Zurich<br />

Endnotes<br />

(1) So for instance in the first issue of the British periodical<br />

Confidence 1,1 (April 1908). pp. 8-10; or in the Swiss journal<br />

-<br />

Die<br />

Verheissung des Vaters 6, 36 (1913), p. 8. Testimonies from various<br />

iocial backgrounds are mentioned and the witnesses are referred to with<br />

full name, occasionally also uith their complete address.<br />

(2) Raimundo PANXKKAR, Myth, Faith and Hermeneutics (New York:<br />

Paulist Press, 1979), p. 249,<br />

(3) Alphonse DE WAELHENS, I1Ambiguftk de la notion de<br />

tlimoignage," in Le thoignage, Enrico CASTELLI ed., (paris: Aubier,<br />

1972), pp. 467-476.<br />

(5) The case of schizophrenia should however not be confused<br />

uith the double aspect: of the self making a testimonial narrative<br />

possible. Paul BROCKELHAfi distinguishes a self which is characterized<br />

in the tsmporal process brought to light in the testimony, and the self<br />

which causes any reflection about it, Tho ability to keep one's<br />

distance from a temporal experience also explains self-deception,<br />

namely the interplay betwcen a deceiving self and a deceived self. A t<br />

the same time it allows awareness of this arocess and a correction OF<br />

ael f-.decep tion. Paul UROCUELMAN, Time and Self. Phenonsnological<br />

Explorations (Oecatur: 1985), pp, 15-16, 82-83.


(5) Alphone DE WAELHENS, Ambiguftk, pp. 470-473. By implication<br />

the objective to Ittell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the<br />

truth" is in fact a paranoiac fallacy! Another example of unambiguous<br />

and self-deceptive testimony has been discussed by Stanles HAUERWAS in<br />

an article on Albert SPEERfs autobiography lllnside the Third Reichll in<br />

Truthfulaess and Tragedy: Further Investigations in Christian Ethics,<br />

(Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 1977), pp. 82-98. HAUERWAS<br />

mentions various reasons for consciously or unconsciously allowing<br />

self-deception in an autobiographical narrative. To give a few examples<br />

the following desires are cited: to stay morally ignorant about a<br />

certain state of affairs, not to spell out certain activities, to<br />

cherish an illusion, to fit a social role. TO illustrate the possible<br />

extent of self-deception HAUERWAS points to SPEER's deliberate<br />

avoidance of the Jewish issue by clinging to the narrative thread that<br />

presented him as HITLERls apolitical architect. SPEER put aesthetics<br />

over ethics and correlated his identity picture to that decision.<br />

(6) To give a few examples from early <strong>Pentecostal</strong>ism: "A<br />

Wonderful Case of Cancer Healing by the Lord," i n Confidence 5,3<br />

(1912), pp. 65f,; "A Girl's Miracle-Cure,tl in Christian Herald (March<br />

7th, 1912), reprinted in Confidence 5,3 (1912)~ pp. 70f.; Ver alle<br />

deine Krankheiten heilt," in Die Verheissung des Vaters 9,11+12 (1916),<br />

pp. 6ff.<br />

(7) For further information see for instance the writings of<br />

Paul RICOEUR, such as, Essays on Biblical Interpretation, Lewis S.<br />

MUDGE, ed., (Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1974-1980), pp. 73-154; and<br />

The Rule of Metaphor (London: Routledge E Kegan Paul, 1977).<br />

(8) On a theory of disclosure of odd logic cf. Ian T. RAMSEY,<br />

Religious Language: An Empirical Placing of <strong>Theological</strong> Phrases<br />

(London: SCM Press, 1957).<br />

(9) Edward SCHILLEBEECKX, The Understanding of Faith: In terpretation<br />

and Criticism (London: Sheed and Ward. 1974). .. o.<br />

9<br />

160,<br />

(10) Phillipe LEJEUNE, "Le pact autobiographique,~~ in Podtique<br />

14 (1973) 9 pp. 137-162.<br />

(11) Paul RICEUR, Vhe Hermeneutics of Testimony,l in Essays on<br />

Biblical Interpretation, p. 125.<br />

(12) See endnote (1).<br />

(13) William EVERETT, "Liturgy and Ethics: A Response to Saliers<br />

and RamseylH in The Journal of Religious Ethics 7,2 ( 1979)~ p. 209.<br />

(14) William EVERETT, "Liturgy and Ethics," p, 210.<br />

Paul<br />

I I , BOOK REVIEWS<br />

ELBEIIT (ed.), Essays on Apostolic Themes: Studies in<br />

Honor of Howard M. ERVIN presented to him by<br />

Colleagues and Friends on his Sixty-fifth Birthday<br />

(Peabody, MA: Hendrickson Publishers, 1985). . . 239<br />

pp. Reviewed by John KARSTEN, Zeist, ~olland.<br />

Honoring a scholar with a book - a familiar custom<br />

among Germans - is starting among Charismatics and<br />

<strong>Pentecostal</strong>n. This back honors the American scholar and<br />

Pastor H.M. ERVIN who teaches at Oral Roberts University.<br />

A brief story of ERVIN'S life and his bibliography is<br />

included. The contributors come from a wide range of<br />

denominations, including the Assemblies of God and the<br />

Roman Catholic Church.<br />

A brief survey will illustrate the book's value. At<br />

the: level of l~orrneneu'tical presuppositions, William<br />

MENZIES defends the classical pentecostal link between<br />

,[;he I4oly Spirit and tongues while G,A, TURNER briefly<br />

doacribea tho Woly Spirit in the Hermeneutics of the<br />

Iicformation and the Radical Reformation." Strangely<br />

enough, he includes Pietism, Quakerism and Methodism in<br />

which the inner. testimony is the major work of the<br />

Spirit. In HI-lermeneutics; A <strong>Pentecostal</strong> Option," ERVIN<br />

himself opposes demythoLogization and the new hermeneutics.<br />

I-le argues that the miraculous is not mythical<br />

but real and can be experienced today by the Spirit. This<br />

assumptian, he believes, is more realistic than an<br />

accomodation to outmoded materialistic thinking.<br />

F.P. BRUCE writes exhaus'tively on "The Spirit in<br />

the I,,ettcr to tho Ga.latianstl and relates data to other<br />

New Tsstament aogments . The Galatians had received the<br />

Spirit vi~ibl.y and He had produced love and hope, The<br />

promise was given praviously that the judgment started<br />

with Pentecost RO that justification and life in the<br />

Spirit are inseparable. Adoption is not only a change in


status for it implies a relationship to God as Father,<br />

and Jesus as Lord. BRUCE'S consideration of the leading<br />

of the Spirit in moral living and the fruit of Christ's<br />

character concludes a first-rate study.<br />

J .D. G. DUNN in his contribution entitled "Romans<br />

7:14-25 in the Theology of Paultt argues forcefully and<br />

with broad documentation that this position describes<br />

Paul's present christian life. Those contending for<br />

other views (e.g. that the passage refers to Paul's<br />

pre-christian life, or the majority view that it refers<br />

to men apart from Christ as viewed by a believer) will<br />

need to take note of his arguments. H.R. YIM has his<br />

focus on "Preaching God's Word in Demonstration of the<br />

Spirit and of Power.I1 He argues that effective preaching<br />

requires the centrality of the Bible and the ministry of<br />

the Holy Spirit and that the goal of preaching is<br />

liberating people although the context in which preaching<br />

occurs can vary.<br />

J. HORNER relates "The Holy Spirit and the Wisdom<br />

of God," while J. REA examines "The Personal Relationship<br />

of Old Testament Believers to the Holy Spirit,"<br />

concluding that Old Testament believers were regenerated,<br />

but not permanently indwelt by the Spirit, Temporary<br />

endowment for tasks did occur, but only just before<br />

Christts ascension was the Spirit finally given. C,M.<br />

ROBECK, Jr. shows that IRENAEUS, the second century<br />

bishop of Lyons, was acquainted with charismatic<br />

phenomena not only in Gnostic and Montanist settings, but<br />

also in orthodox churches, for prophecy was apparently<br />

part of normal church life.<br />

The editor of this volume, Paul ELBERT, discusses<br />

sympathetically and broadly llCalvin and the Spiritual<br />

Gifts." It is common knowledge that CALVIN considered the<br />

visible gifts to have ceased in apostolic times, yet he<br />

recognized graces and ministries in the Church. Some<br />

"restoration pastors" now follow CALVIN possibly without<br />

knowing it. G. STRACHAN proves his grasp of the<br />

It<strong>Theological</strong> and Cultural Origins of the Nineteenth<br />

Century <strong>Pentecostal</strong> Movement." This movement started<br />

among the cultured members under influence of new<br />

cultural impulses which uncovered old biblical truths<br />

Such as the uni~ersal love of God, the humanity of Christ<br />

which overcame through the Spirit, and the pattern of the<br />

early church.<br />

<strong>European</strong> topics are discussed by Ivar LUNDGRAN, who<br />

describes briefly I1Lewi PETHRUS and the Swedish<br />

<strong>Pentecostal</strong> Movement. Although the description is brief<br />

the author is successful in his task. L. GOTT introduces<br />

ttDonald GEE: The Apostle of Balance" as he describes the<br />

man who excelled as a Bible teacher, writer and educator.<br />

I-lis involvement with Bible school work should be well<br />

known, for he stated that he ftshould like to make it<br />

clear that we place no premium upon ignorance and<br />

illiteracy" (p 176). Furthermore, GEE'S stance on<br />

healing and wealth is atill important. J.L. CORNELLY in<br />

his article entitled "Not in the Reputable Churches: The<br />

Reception of the Charismatic Movement in the Mainline<br />

Churches in AmericaM shows that these churches first<br />

opposed the charismatic phenomena claiming that<br />

glossolalia was symptomatic of mental illness, but in the<br />

19701s it came to acceptance, provided certain safe<br />

guard. were strongly maintained. Fundamentalist churches,<br />

nsvertheless, remained opposed, The article concludes<br />

w tth the unexpected findings of GREELEY and McCREALY that<br />

45% of all Americans claim ecstatic experiences,<br />

The Jesuit *D,L. GELPI in his "Ecumenical<br />

Reflections on Christ s Eucharistic Presence" utilizes<br />

his philaeophical. training to relate different underatandings<br />

of communion in LUTHER, CALVIN, and ACQUINAS to<br />

the appropriate philosophical frame of reference. He then<br />

advances nine affirmations which, he hopes could prove<br />

acceptable to all, but of course not all will accept<br />

them, This item is certainly the most original article in<br />

the book. J. AMSTUTZ in "Deyond Pentecogt: A Study of<br />

Some Sociological Dimensions of New Testament Church<br />

Growth from the Book of Actsft examines why the early<br />

Church continued to grow, The reasons he finds are: a<br />

love expressed socially, a conductive structure, the fact


that all believers were active, the expansion of<br />

leadership base, the indigenous nature of the Church and<br />

a sensitivity to culture, its concentration of receptive<br />

people and, finally, the fact that multiplication was<br />

built in. This article is one of the most practical.<br />

Indexes of names and references conclude this<br />

beautifully produced book.<br />

Howard M. ERVIN, Conversion-Initiation and the Baptism in<br />

the Holy Spirit (Peabody, MA: Hendrickson, 1984),<br />

172 pp. Reviewed by David PETTS, Mattersey,<br />

England.<br />

This fine study by Dr. Howard M. ERVIN, who is a<br />

professor at Oral Roberts University, is sub-titled "An<br />

Engaging Critique of James D.G. DUNNts 'Baptism in the<br />

Holy Spirit,tl1 a work which, since its publication in<br />

1970, has been acclaimed by those who oppose a common<br />

pentecostal position. DUNNts conversion-initiation<br />

thesis, . which sees repentance, faith, baptism and the<br />

gift of the Holy Spirit as representing an indivisible<br />

unity without which one is not a Christian, provides the<br />

basis for his rejection of the pentecostal understanding<br />

of the Baptism in the Holy Spirit as an enduement with<br />

power for service received subsequent to regeneration.<br />

ERVIN recognizes DUNN's work as Itone of the most<br />

comprehensive and influential rebuttals of <strong>Pentecostal</strong>ism<br />

todayt1 and systematically tackles DUNN s<br />

conversion-initiation hypothesis chapter by chapter. As a<br />

result the structure of his work is predetermined by that<br />

of DUNN .<br />

Following DUNNt s outline ERVIN deals first with the<br />

John the Baptist references to the Baptism in the Holy<br />

Sprit, then with Jesusf baptism, the Day of Pentecost,<br />

the Samaritans, Paul, Cornelius, and the Ephesian<br />

disciples. Relevant passages in the Epistles of Paul and<br />

the Johannine literature are covered systematically<br />

followed by those in Hebrews and I Peter. The standard<br />

pentecostal understanding of the Baptism in the Holy<br />

Spirit as subsequent to regeneration is defended<br />

throughout and the weaknesses and presuppositions in<br />

DUNNts position are exposed,<br />

Particularly compelling, for example, is ERVIN'S<br />

rejection of DUNNts contention that the Samaritans were<br />

nat yet Christians even though they had believed and been<br />

baptised. By a careful comparison of the use of the verb<br />

pisteuein elsewhere in the NT writings ERVIN skillfully<br />

refutes DUNNts contention that the use of the verb with<br />

the dative indicates only an intellectual acceptance<br />

rather than real commitment.<br />

There are times, however, when one feels that ERVIN<br />

is pressing far too hard for the concept of the<br />

subsequence of the Baptism in the Holy Spirit. This is<br />

particularly evident when he argues that the infilling<br />

recorded in Acts 4:31 was the occasion oithe converts at<br />

Pentecost receiving the Baptism in the Holy Spirit,<br />

though even here the discussion is scholarly if<br />

unconvincing, In this connection it is unfortunate that<br />

ERVIN, along wikh many pentecostal exegetes, falls into<br />

the trap of insisting that the Baptism in the Spirit must<br />

follow regeneration when all that the pentecostal<br />

position logically demands in that it may.<br />

Despite these cautions, however, ERVIN has made a<br />

valuable contribution to pentecostal scholarship and<br />

appears in most cases to have successfully challenged<br />

DUNNts exegesis. However, it is unfortunate that his<br />

style is far less readable than DUNN's and 'despite his<br />

claim to have attempted to minimise the tediousness of<br />

the kind of answer demanded by such a response, one<br />

cannot help but feel that, in this respect at least, he*<br />

has failed. We are, nevertheless, grateful to ERVIN for a<br />

skillful and thorough rebuttal of DUNN s hypothesis. His<br />

work should undoubstedly stand alongside that of DUNN in<br />

every Bible college library.


Ingmar GUSTAFSSON, Bengt SAMUELSSON and Per SUNDBERG,<br />

Nyreligiiisa rijrelser i Svergie: En kort presenta-<br />

- tion Ingmar GUSTAFSSON (ed.), (Stockholm: Normans<br />

Forlag, 1983), 160 pp. Reviewed by David BUNDY,<br />

Lexington, KY; U.S.A.<br />

The study of new religious movements was<br />

traditionally designated the study of "cults. " That term<br />

came to connote condescension and an assumed negative<br />

evaluation. In congruence with the long tradition of<br />

apologetics within the christian tradition, such works<br />

served to convince the convinced that the alternative<br />

traditions were not valid traditions. Such triumphalism,<br />

however, makes for poor scholarship and does not<br />

accomplish its purpose within the church, much less<br />

outside, In highly individualistic western society, the<br />

llcultsll approach is not taken seriously by persons who<br />

have actually come into contact with other, albeit newer,<br />

traditions and have felt the strength of their<br />

commitments and integrity and have recognized the cogency<br />

of their reason.<br />

The present volume by GUSTAFFSON et. al. takes<br />

quite a different approach. The effort is to present, as<br />

accurately and non-prejudicially as possible, the history<br />

and religious philosophy of the various new religious<br />

movements recruiting in contemporary Sweden. The<br />

introductory chapter (pp, 11-16) reveals the personal<br />

commitments of the authors to an established tradition.<br />

They note that the majority of the new movements have<br />

arrived in Sweden from the U.S.A., including most of<br />

those which are originally from East Asia and India. They<br />

also indicate that most groups are rather authoritarian<br />

in their community structures, concerned with security in<br />

the future,<br />

and do not accept the traditional christian<br />

canon and exegesis.<br />

The authors introduce serially the Jehovah's<br />

Witnesses (pp. 17-40) , Mormonism (pp. 41-60) , Baha i (pp,<br />

61-66}, Transcendental Meditation (pp. 67-72), Zen and<br />

other forms of meditation (73-84), Scientology (pp.<br />

85-92), Family of God (Karlekens Famil j ) (pp. 93-loo),<br />

spiritualism (PP. 101-108), Hare Krishna (pp. 109-112),<br />

~heosophy (PP. 113-120 ) , Anthroposophy (121-124), The<br />

unification Church (Tongill (125-131 ) , Eckankar (132-133)<br />

and UFO-ology (pp. 134-136). The method is consistent.<br />

The history of the group and its development are<br />

the teachings of the movement are described,<br />

sources of authority identified, and the organisational<br />

structure delineated, When there are creeds or statements<br />

of faith, these are appended. Extensive bibliography<br />

about each movement i ~ l provided (pp. 137-144). Here as<br />

well., the effort of the writers to be fair is apparent,<br />

After a list of general works on new religious movements,<br />

the bibliography is classified according to movement, In<br />

each case the movement's own literature is presented<br />

first, and then a bibliography of works about the<br />

movement is added. A general index and a separate index<br />

of names facilitate use of the volume as a reference<br />

tool, A study plan, which allows the volume to be used in<br />

church groups or classrooma is appended.<br />

The volume is remarkable for its perspective,<br />

design and for the accuracy of the information presented.<br />

It iu hoped that this work will serve as a model for<br />

other efforts.<br />

Ralph P, MARTIN, The Spirit and the Congregation (Grand<br />

Rapids: Wil.liam B. Eerdmans Publishing Cob , 1984),<br />

vii + 168 pp. Reviewed by Robert A. LOVE, Brussels<br />

Belgium.<br />

A t first glance, The Spiri't and the Congregation<br />

appears to be simply a specialized commentary. To be<br />

sure, it is that. -1t deals successively with the last<br />

four chapters of tho book of First Corinthians.


The underlying purpose of the book, however, is not<br />

merely the exposition of an intrinsically interesting<br />

portion of scripture. The theme is congregational<br />

worship, with all spiritualities, charisms and graces in<br />

operation and under review by apostolic authority,<br />

Each of the chapters is preceded by a transla'tion<br />

of the text to be considered. Such translations, often<br />

presumed to be literal, are occasionally presented as the<br />

capstones of the arguments. In this case, rather the<br />

author provides us with "Points to Ponder.I1 These are<br />

identifications and amplifications of difficult areas,<br />

Reference is made without comment to scholarly opinion.<br />

Of particular interest to the community of modern<br />

day pentecostal believers, whether classical or charismatic,<br />

are the treatments of First Corinthians twelve and<br />

fourteen. It is refreshing that the traditional<br />

evangelical proscriptions are overlooked if not forgotten.<br />

The unsupportable contention that tttongues shall<br />

ceaset1 becomes a positive assertion that there should be,<br />

Itin a public service, a desired blend of the formal and<br />

the intimate that never descends to the level of what is<br />

no better than the casual or even flippant.I1 (p. 64)<br />

The themes of congregational unity and edification<br />

inhere. The author speaks clearly for the broad scope of<br />

gifts. MARTIN identifies twenty gifts of God in the New<br />

Testament literature. The nine selected for mention in I<br />

Corinthians were Paul's choice based on the situation at<br />

Corinth. In response to this situation a call is issued<br />

for order and a disciplined way of conducting worship. As<br />

onerous as it may seem there should be control: the<br />

control of the Spirit, self-control of the believers, and<br />

as necessary, the more formal control of leadership. Paul<br />

opposed Itthe Corinthians1 desire to turn the church into<br />

a Gnostic conventicle of private individuals, each<br />

concerned with his or her own inalienable experiences and<br />

heedless of the corporate dimension ..,I1 (D. .-<br />

62)<br />

The Spirit and the Congregation offers interesting<br />

- even fascinating - alternative explanations for a<br />

number of interpretations which have been canonized by<br />

the classicists of many camps. For example, Paul enjoins<br />

the Corinthians not to forbid speaking in tongues<br />

(14:39). The standard pentecostal/ charismatic approach<br />

is to refrain gingerly from any discouragement of the<br />

of 'this gift except under all but the most<br />

extreme of circumstances. Othera take the view that<br />

tongues are by no mean8 forbidden. "Let them,I1 they say,<br />

tigo to the pentacostal church and do it.!! MARTIN points,<br />

however, that there is more than one activity which<br />

passes under this rubric: These are llhottl tongues which<br />

border on frenzy, and ttcoollt tongues which can be<br />

restrained (p. 67). Indeed, it is held that the statement<br />

Itnot all speak with tonguestt (12:30) is explained by this<br />

disti.nction which Paul makes. It is the controllable<br />

variety of tongues which Paul practices and encourages in<br />

others.<br />

The distinguishing of the roles of men and women in<br />

corporate worship is another of MARTIN'S creative<br />

alternatives. There is little doubt that there was at<br />

least; a local problem with the behaviour of the<br />

Corinthian women. This resulted in their identification<br />

as disturbere of the service and the placing of certain<br />

restrictions on their participation. Can we from this<br />

infer that a1.l wamen, everywhere and for all the time,<br />

should be in silence and subjection? Certainly not. The<br />

subjection to which Paul refers is nok to their husbands<br />

but rather ta their own spirits or to the body, Indeed,<br />

the prohibition of women teaching results, in MARTINIS<br />

thinking, not from any intrinsic inferiority of women but<br />

rather from Ittheir wrongful aspiration to charismatic<br />

teachers, Ispenking in inspired languages and laying<br />

clafm to introduce fresh revelations that they were not<br />

willing to have assessed and corrected by the assembly<br />

and in accord with aposto1.i~ standards.I1 (p. 87)<br />

One can hardly refrain from comparing The Spirit<br />

and ,the Congregation with the anti-pentecostal polemics<br />

of a generation or two ago, Ralph MARTIN does not lay<br />

down his pen to bellow and to paw the earth. Rather, we<br />

can picture him smiling or even laughing as he writes.


There are many types of laughter. There is the<br />

laughter which exults over the imperfections of others<br />

and which hardly qualifies as laughter at all. There is<br />

the laughter of friends who share the humor of the<br />

unanticipated of the inconsistent. There is also that<br />

laughter of the one who sees an inconsistency first and<br />

enjoys the dawning perception of the other. This most<br />

gentle of all forms of humor begins within and makes its<br />

way to the surface. Often, a smile is all that remains.<br />

The Spirit and the Congregation does indeed contain<br />

within its scholarly pages that latest from of laughter,<br />

Its source is, as it were, between the lines and speaks<br />

to those who all too readily maintain that all should be<br />

Charismatics. "Ah! " it says, "You see it now. Take care<br />

that you do not lose the mystery of God and your<br />

perception of the body and, in so doing, become merely<br />

spiritual . I '<br />

Carl Erik SANLBERG, The <strong>Pentecostal</strong> Movement - Five Case<br />

Studies (Nairobi: no publisher given, but printed<br />

by Evangel Publishing House, 1985), 69 pp, Reviewed<br />

by Peter HOCKEN, Gaithsrsburg, Maryland, U.S.A.<br />

SHALBERG is a Swedish Lutheran pastor, whose<br />

doctoral dissertation at Upps~la in 1977 was on the<br />

Swedish <strong>Pentecostal</strong> movement and its daily newspaper<br />

Dagen. Since 1983, he has taught church history at<br />

Makumira Lutheran <strong>Theological</strong> College in Tanzania.<br />

This booklet gathers five studies on the<br />

<strong>Pentecostal</strong> movement presented at Makumira. A11 present<br />

an historical account of the evolution from the earliest<br />

stages of the <strong>Pentecostal</strong> movement through the phases of<br />

expansion to those of wider acceptance.<br />

The first study<br />

concerns the attitudes of scholars to <strong>Pentecostal</strong>ism (a<br />

version of this has been published in Evangelical Review<br />

of, January 1985, pp. 70-77) , the rest deal with<br />

the practices and beliefs of <strong>Pentecostal</strong>s: the roles of<br />

the Father and of the Son; attitudes toward political and<br />

involvement; attitudes to medicine and healing;<br />

the: pentecostal missions in Tanzania. The strong points<br />

of these studies are SAHLBERG1s feel far what is<br />

significant, his breadth of interest and of awareness and<br />

his ability to mduce complex data to managable<br />

proportions without distortion. The historical evolution<br />

is presented critically yet sympathetically, avoiding the<br />

two extremes of seeing the movement's history as either<br />

steady decline from pristine glory or as sectarian<br />

fanatics gradually becoming more reasonable. There is<br />

much interesting information in these studies, some of it<br />

not easily accessible elsewhere in English, especially<br />

the parts relating to Scandinavia and to Tanzania. He has<br />

a number of pertinent observations, e .g. "The <strong>Pentecostal</strong><br />

churches of the Third World also keep a more original<br />

eschatological perspective alivevv (p. 30) and "It is no<br />

coincidence that in the country which is considered to be<br />

the most dechristianiz;ed in this Western Europe, namely<br />

Sweden, the first; political party in the world with<br />

pentecouta1.s a8 t;he core shou1.d also ba founded,I1 (p, 32)<br />

Also worth noting nro remarks on early pentecostal .<br />

attitudes to illness aB lacking in any reflection on the<br />

phenomenon of suffering (pp. 39-41).<br />

Thc weakness of these studies is primarily in the<br />

intelligibility of the Engli~h, which must be worse than<br />

the author imagines, and in the carelessness of the use<br />

of source material, which can only partly be due to the<br />

difficulties of writing pentecostal history in a country<br />

with lesser Library facilities, The errors are numerous,<br />

though they @re generally incidental and do not vitiate<br />

the arguments of the studies, Charles W. CONN is referred<br />

to ns Chaileo W. CANNS (p. 6) ; the charismatic renewal is<br />

described as being "born in a univer~ity milieu1' (p. 71,<br />

presum~lbly an attribution of the 1al;er start among<br />

Catholics to the whole movement; James BARR's book<br />

Fundnmentalisrn is mentioned as ~undamental~ (p, 311, and<br />

the plural of homo politicus is wrongly given as homini<br />

'


politici (pp. 3Of. ) ; ttIntercessors for Americatt is<br />

described as being established in about 35 countries,<br />

instead of ttIntercessors for Britaintt, etc. (p. 33) ; the<br />

Assemblies of God in the USA is said to have been "more<br />

closely reorganized in 1914" (p. 51). It is to be hoped<br />

that Dr. SAHLBERG will pursue his historical -<br />

theological reflections on the <strong>Pentecostal</strong> movement, but<br />

that the accuracy of the English and the references will<br />

be significantly improved.<br />

Robert L. YOUNGBLOOD ( ed. ) , Cyprus : TEE Come of Age<br />

(Exeter:: Paternoster Press for the World Evangelical<br />

Fellowship and the International Council of<br />

Accrediting Agencies, 1986), 78 pp. Reviewed by<br />

Donald Dean SMEETON, Rhode St. Genese, Belgium.<br />

Critical self-assessment is characteristic of the<br />

progress toward maturity. The willingness to identify<br />

strengths and acknowledge failures can also contribute to<br />

improvement and self-reliance. It is thus fitting that<br />

<strong>Theological</strong> Education by Extension (TEE), which was<br />

birthed at the Evangelical Presbyterian Seminary two<br />

decades ago, should evidence these signs of having come<br />

of age. self-criticism characterizes this modest volume,<br />

which contains the three major papers presented at a<br />

consultation on TEE sponsored by the International<br />

Council of Accrediting Agencies and the <strong>Theological</strong><br />

Commission of the World Evangelical Fellowship held<br />

during July 1984 in Cyprus.<br />

TEE has outgrown the impertinent exuberance of its<br />

adolescence and its impatience with the traditional<br />

establishment of theological education. Its early<br />

promises included the rejuvenation of educational<br />

structures as well as the renewal of church life. TEE,<br />

with its pattern of independent study punctuated by<br />

periodic classes, promised to bring the school to the<br />

~tudent and to eliminate the elitist mentality that<br />

seemed to dominate theological education. The traditional<br />

pattern of theological education was judged to be<br />

theoretical., irrelevant, and isolated from cultural<br />

realities. TEE seemed to be the only reasonable option<br />

for those parts of the world where Christianity was<br />

rapid ~u~erical growth and where leadership<br />

not be severed for a period of four or more years<br />

of theological formation on the western model in<br />

isolation from the student's own community. TEE was<br />

considered the perfect answer to the needs, for it wag<br />

formed in the matrix of church growth, missiology, and<br />

theological education.<br />

TEE branched from its Latin ~merickn beginnings to<br />

take root in virtually every continent. TEE has<br />

mushroomed from the first attempts at small step<br />

programed learning, to the copious variety of adaptions of<br />

culture and language, The bandwagon was boarded by a<br />

large number of denominational, interdenominational, and<br />

non-denominational educational organizations. Some<br />

programs have been concerned only with ministerial<br />

training while others have broadened to include the<br />

training of lay 1.eadership in the local church. Even<br />

though TEE has challenged traditional assump tions and<br />

created many new structures, the educational literature<br />

has not kept; pace with these developments. Ross F.<br />

KINSLER has documented Rome of the variety and character<br />

of these programs by his Ministry by the People<br />

(Maryknoll: Orbia Books, l983), but his study is<br />

descriptive and ilXustrative rather than analytical. The<br />

number and variety of TEE programs defies any attempts at<br />

forming a comprehensive listing. As the manifestations of<br />

TEE have multiplied, however, so have its weaknesses.<br />

Although TEE has had considerable success, it has not<br />

achieved ita full promiss, This is precisely why the work<br />

by YOUNGBLOOD is so important, It appears that even some<br />

of the practices that were once judged so harshly now


seem to characterize the TEE structures themselves.<br />

The<br />

message seems to be that TEE may have come of age,<br />

but it<br />

-<br />

has not yet arrived.<br />

As ..-<br />

often happens with the publication of conference<br />

papers, this collection suffers from variety in style,<br />

content and documentation, But even after one makes the<br />

predictable comments about unevenness, there ie an<br />

important logical continuity that binds these studies<br />

together by covering the past, present and future. Each<br />

essay was prepared by an educator with broad experience<br />

in distance education programs in a developing nation.<br />

Each contribution is permeated with practical insights<br />

and personal commitment. Each has its own significance.<br />

. A summasv of the history of TEE is sketched by<br />

Kenneth MULHOL~AND whose fluid style is interrupted by<br />

his over-fondness for citing authorities, especially<br />

himself! This essay is, however, more than a history<br />

lesson for MULHOLLAND does not; hesitate to draw lessons<br />

from history by listing TEE'S achievements and failures,<br />

Next Lois McKENNEY, who pioneered cooperative work among<br />

the TEE programs in Brazil, appeals for interaction among<br />

TEE programs, residential schools, accrediting agencies<br />

and other educational entities. Articulate appeals even<br />

when linked with practical suggestions are, however,<br />

easier to make than to implement and her essay suffers<br />

from a lack of the documentation which she could so<br />

easily have added. In another chapter, Robert FERRIS<br />

analyzes the educational psychologies of Paulo FREIRE,<br />

Jean PIAGET, Robert CARKHUFF, Arthur COMBS and Malcolm<br />

KNOWLES, then offers suggestions for the application of<br />

these theories to theological education. He identifies<br />

what he believes should be the essential and controlling<br />

values for future developments of TEE. I-ie concludes that<br />

whatever new patterns develop they must be centered in<br />

experience, grounded in servanthood, and committed to the<br />

need for continued improvement. In keeping with these<br />

needs, Randall BELL contributes a final chapter on<br />

"Institutional Self-Evaluation in Bible Colleges."<br />

Although this document has its origins in the American<br />

accrediting system Was not part of the Cyprus<br />

meeting, it forms a natural sequence to the concept of<br />

self-criticism which is essential to the improvement of<br />

any educational system.<br />

TEE is characteristically, but not exclusively, the<br />

genius of Evangelicalism with its camrnitments<br />

to b~ing<br />

every Christinn to full maturity. It has brought training<br />

to those in tho pulpit as well. as those in the pew who<br />

otherwise would be denied the opportunity of a<br />

theal.ogicnl education. The TEE concepts and techniques,<br />

however, have influenced a wide variety of other<br />

educational programs, Rome evcn outside the discipline of<br />

theology, This influence explains why these essays demand<br />

attention from all who work in decentralized programs or<br />

seek to irnplemen'k distance education structures. The<br />

biblio~rnphien increase the book's usefulness as a<br />

starting point to understanding TIYE, This work may not be<br />

the definitive otudy, but it 1s an important analysis.<br />

IT I , NOTES<br />

C.S. BUTLER, Te5t the Spirits: An Examination of the<br />

Charismatic Movemsnt (Welwyn, Merta: Evangelical<br />

Press, 1985). 156 pp.<br />

Of all the hundredfl of book8 on the <strong>Pentecostal</strong> and<br />

Charismatic movement that X have read this one must rank<br />

as one of the wormt, The publiaherls blurb speaks of the<br />

author's "wealth of experience from within the<br />

charismatic movement. This is contradicted by his own<br />

testimony - which i~ held over until page 124. Me appears<br />

to have tried almost everything. How long he maintains<br />

his position remains to be seen.<br />

The standard of scholarship in this volume is of a<br />

low order. Most of the details are borrowed from<br />

sccondnry sources, There are serious works which question


pentecostal theology and practice (i.e, BRUNNER, DUNN,<br />

and HOEKEMA) but these are ignored, perhaps because the<br />

author considered them too sophisticated, The publishers<br />

have tarnished their good name by such a production. The<br />

book is trivial. The chapter on gifts in the New<br />

Testament contains less than 500 words. Whole groups are<br />

dismissed with a flick of the pen. For example, to write<br />

of David BERG and the Children of God as charismatic is a<br />

travesty.<br />

If it is true as the author claims - and this is<br />

one of the few things in this book with which I would<br />

agree - that there is a growing acceptance of charismatic<br />

practice among some evangelicals" (p. 62), this book will<br />

do nothing to stem the tide. <strong>Pentecostal</strong>/charismatic<br />

theology and practice are open to examination. Some<br />

things that have been done are not above criticism, but<br />

this book will only confirm the prejudices of those whose<br />

minds are already closed and will cause unnecessary<br />

offence to others.<br />

and numerous christian services. The book<br />

ranges from animal welfare organizations to an article by<br />

Jim HOLWAY on Mosque attendance,<br />

Yet; it itit more than a data base on Christian<br />

trivia: it is a revealing study of trends and a pmgnosticator<br />

of the future. For example, the table on page<br />

142 shows that the list of Elim ministers increased from<br />

152 in 1980 'to 403 in 1985. This change represents an<br />

increase of 21% Per m'mum but the number of churches<br />

increased only Q.8% per amurn during the same period, One<br />

can easily sea that this kind of information is essential<br />

for long range plnnning for this group of pentecostal<br />

churches.<br />

In addition the collection of data, the editor<br />

offers an assessment of trends affecting Christianity in<br />

the UK. Ma describes 1) the nature of the post-christian<br />

era, 2) the increasing frngmentation, 3) more polarization,<br />

4) the challenges to leadership, 5) a decreasing<br />

nominalism, 6) the irrelevance of denominational labels,<br />

and 7) the expectations of growth.<br />

Peter BRIERLEY (ed.), UK Christian Handbook <strong>1987</strong>/88<br />

Edition (Bromley , Kent: MARC Europe; London:<br />

Evangelical Alliance; Swindon, Wilts: Bible<br />

Society, 1986), 649 pp.<br />

Do you need to find a christian children's home in<br />

Kent? Or, the telephone number of the headquarters in<br />

London of the Prayer Book Society? Or, a complete list of<br />

all the christian periodicals published in the UK? Or how<br />

to compare the charges of all the anglican theological<br />

colleges? A l l of these answers - and many, many more -<br />

are accessible in this one convenient resource. It<br />

contains listing (with relevant information) on accomodations,<br />

bookshops, churches, educational institutions,<br />

leadership resources, media ministries, missionary<br />

Walter J, HOLJJiNWEGER and S, CARREL, "Le dernier repas:<br />

une liturgie eucl~aristi.que narrative et tht5atrale,lq<br />

Hokhma, 32 (1986), 1-21.<br />

Thia article consists of four parts and provides a<br />

general introduction to H0LLENWEGERt8 theological methodology.<br />

The firfjt part surveys his academic and<br />

ministerial back~round while the second provides a<br />

theological profile, The third presents a drama that<br />

interprets the rite of the Lord's Supper for the particip~nts<br />

and, final.ly, the article closes with a partial<br />

listing of I-IOL1,ENWEGER '8 publications. The authors see<br />

the tradi,tional pr0testnn.t churche~ as much concerned<br />

with hermenewtical reflection on *the biblical texts and<br />

not interested enough in the intercultural proclamation


of the Gospel. Too often their western orientation has<br />

led to division. Faced with this situation, HOLLENWEGER<br />

pleads for an emphasis on picture, story and narrative in<br />

communicating spiritual reality. He also calls for a reevaluation<br />

of the physical aspects of religion including<br />

emotion.<br />

D.D.S.<br />

Marc H. SPINDLER , ttEurope s Neo-Paganism : A Perverse<br />

Inculturation," International Bulletin of Missionary<br />

Research, 11,l (January <strong>1987</strong>), 8-11,<br />

Marc SPINDLER of the University of Leiden traces<br />

the historical background and the importance of Europe's<br />

neo-pagans. He maintains that although this phenomena has<br />

political overtones, it is primarily a religious<br />

movement. We sees the main features of this religion to<br />

be 1) the affirmation of the sacred, against the<br />

desacralization of the universe so that there is no<br />

distance between God and the world; 2) the exaltation of<br />

the vitality and joy of natural human life (in such a way<br />

that eros is separated from agape); 3) the recognition of<br />

fate as a ruling force in human affairs; and 4) the<br />

stress on its claim to cultural identity. This view<br />

features faith in a cosmic beginning and cyclical view of<br />

history. For a significant number of people, <strong>European</strong><br />

neo-paganism is an ideology of resistance against global<br />

systems, drawing upon mythical elements in the prechristian<br />

tradition of european cultures. The article<br />

ends with an appeal to the churches to communicate a<br />

gospel that is not obscured, diluted or mutilated.<br />

D.D.S.<br />

David THORP, "Renewing the Face of the Earth,I1 - New<br />

Covenant (February <strong>1987</strong>), 25-27.<br />

This article is one of several in this issue<br />

dedicated to celebrating the twentieth anniversary of the<br />

Catholic Charismatic Renewal. The entire magazine is a<br />

collection of photographs, evaluations, summaries and<br />

comments by or about the leaders of the renewal.<br />

The one contribution chosen for this llnotetv<br />

identifies what the author deems to be the significant<br />

characteristics of the renewal. Furthermore, he relates<br />

them theologj.cally to the Second Vatican Council. This is<br />

natural, for the renewal understands itself as a visible<br />

manifestation of the famous "pente~ostal~~ prayer of Pope<br />

John XXIII. THORP finds six "wonders" that characterize<br />

the Catholic renewal: 1) giving attention to the working<br />

of the Holy Spirit; 2) experiencing Jesus as Lord; 3)<br />

fostering lives of holiness; 4) serving in Christ's name;<br />

5) stressing evangelization; and 6) experiencing<br />

ecumenism.<br />

D.D.S.<br />

Reinhold ULONSKA, Andens gaver i lare og praxis (Stockholm:<br />

Filadelfiaforlaget, 1986), 283 pp. Translation<br />

of Geistes Gaben in Lehre und Praxis (Erzhausen:<br />

Leuchter Verlag, 1983).<br />

This work, !!The gifts of the Spirit in Doctrine and<br />

Practice," is a literary experience. ULONSKA is a leading<br />

Gesmnn pentecostal pastor and his West German background<br />

is evident he strives to give a reliable picture of<br />

things that are understood to be controversial by many in<br />

his home country.<br />

The book is a good summary of the best classical<br />

pentecostal teaching about truths and realities that have<br />

characterized the <strong>Pentecostal</strong> movement during several<br />

decades. It gives a sound, biblically inspired, easily


understood, and practical presentation of the gifts of<br />

the Spirit. The author defines the "gifts of the Spirit"<br />

in the context of I Corinthians 12 in a balanced manner<br />

and focuses on the place that the gifts have in building<br />

the Church. He works actively with the Greek original to<br />

understand the expressions of Paul.<br />

ULONSKA differentiates between Itgifts according to<br />

grace" and "gifts of the Spirit." He sees the former in<br />

Romans 12 and the latter in I Corinthians 12, The<br />

presentation would have benefitted and been enriched by a<br />

comparison of these gifts. A special treatment of the<br />

gifts that the apostle mentions in the Epistle to the<br />

Romans would have deepened and broadened the perspective<br />

of the work of the Spirit in the individual and the<br />

Church. We can be grateful for this book that ULONSKA has<br />

written. It summarizes, for a new generation of both<br />

<strong>Pentecostal</strong>s and Charismatics, a teaching that has - and<br />

still - guides many.<br />

B.E.<br />

CONTRIBUTORS: B.E. = Bjorn ERIXON; D.W.C. = Desmond W.<br />

CARTWRIGHT, D.D.S. = Donald D. SMEETON<br />

RECENT PUBLI CAT1 ONS<br />

Earl C. DAVIS, Layman's Library of Christian Doctrine :<br />

Life in the Spirit (Nashville, TN: Broadman Press,<br />

19861, 140 pp.<br />

Douglas W. FRANK, Leas than Conquerors: How Evangelicals<br />

Entered the ~ F r a n Rapids, d MI:<br />

Eerdmans, 1986), 310 pp.<br />

JUrgen MOLTMANN, God in Creation: A New Theology of<br />

Creation and the Spirit of God (London: Harper &<br />

Row, 19851, 365 pp. English translation of: Gott in<br />

der SchGpfun~: Oekologische Schopfungslehre<br />

(Munich: Chr. Kaiser Verlag, 1985).<br />

Douglas MOO, An Annotated Bibliography on the Bible and<br />

the Church (Deerfield, IL: Trinity Evangelical<br />

School, 1986), 113 pp.<br />

Tomislav PERVAN, Queen of Peace: Echo of the Eternal Word<br />

(Steubenville, OM: Franciscan University Press,<br />

19861, 58 pp.<br />

Cecil M. ROBECK, Jr. (ed. ) , Charismatic Experiences in<br />

History ( peabody, MA : endr ricks on Publishers,<br />

l985), 180 pp,<br />

Donald Dean SMEETON, Lollard Themes in the Reformation<br />

Theology of William Tyndale, Vol, VI of Sixteenth<br />

Century Essays and Studies (Kirksville, MO: Sixteenth<br />

Cetury Journal Publishers, 1986), 285 pp,<br />

Lois BARRETT,, Building the House Church (Scottdale, PA:<br />

Herald Press, 1986), 176 pp.<br />

Anne COOPER (compiler), Ishmael: My Brother; A Biblical<br />

Course on Islam (Bromley, Kent: MARC Europe, 1985),<br />

217 pp.<br />

Glenn<br />

C, SMITH (ed) , Evangelizing Adul.ts (Wheaton, IL:<br />

Paulist National Catholic Evangeliea.t;ion <strong>Association</strong><br />

and Tyndale Publishers, 1985), 409 pp,


V. CHRONICLE<br />

ENGLAND. The INTERNATIONAL CORRESPONDENCE INSTITUTE Office in Dorking<br />

headed by Adrian and Selina WEST recorded the highest number of new<br />

student enrollments of all the ICI national offices i n Europe in 1986. .<br />

During the year, the office enrolled 223 students i n their first I C I<br />

course. This figure makes that office one of the most active in the<br />

world-wide network of ICI offices. The second highest figure was by<br />

Oitmar MITTELSTAEDT with 77 new students. There were 518 first time<br />

enrollments recorded for all the I C I national offices i n Europe for the<br />

year. (Correspondent: Melody GARBER)<br />

GERMANY, Paul WILLISCROFT, a longterm Assemblies of God (U.S.A.)<br />

missionary to Germany and Eastern Europe, died on February 24, <strong>1987</strong>. He<br />

and his wife Gladys had been active in that area of Europe for almost<br />

40 years. Paul WILLISGROFT~s activity was marked by a pioneering spirit<br />

that ranged frora missionary activity to the building of a publishing<br />

company, from youth work to professional formation in pastoral<br />

activities. His influence was especially felt i n the BEROA Bibleschool<br />

of the Federation of <strong>Pentecostal</strong> Free Churches were he taught for more<br />

than 30 years. The imprints of his life are an illustration of a<br />

faithful witness to the Gospel of Christ. (Taken from: Wort und Geist<br />

Nr. 3 (March <strong>1987</strong>)<br />

YUGOSLAVIA. The BIBLICAL-THEOLOGICAL INSTITUTE i n Osijek reports a<br />

record enrollment of forty residential students of nine different<br />

nationalities and five different denominations. Although all have high<br />

recommendations from their home churches, two-thirds of the students<br />

come from non-christian homes. In addition to their studies, the<br />

students are involved in church evangelistic activities on the<br />

weekends. Although BTI is presently crowded beyond its capacities, it<br />

has many inquiries from several other socialist countries of Eastern<br />

Europe and the Third World. The Yugoslavian authorities are open to<br />

allowing such students to come and they are granting visas to foreign<br />

students. (Correspondent: Peter KUZMIC)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!