68. RETAILTexasmarketingpresentationFINAL.pdf - Enerplus

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Our Assets Tight Gas/Shallow Gas • Capital Spending: • $60 MM tight gas • $10 MM shallow gas • 39% of production • 19% of NOI • 542 Bcfe 2P reserves 2010 Divestments • Sold 10,400 BOE/day non-core assets • $870 MM in proceeds • 115 properties • Average netback $28/BOE • Op cost $14/BOE • 2P reserves – 34 MMBOE (69% oil) Crude Oil Waterfloods • $110 MM capital spending • 18% of production • 28% of NOI • 84 MMBOE 2P Reserves • 60 MMBOE Best Estimate Contingent Resource Bakken/Tight Oil • $300 MM capital spending • 20% of production • 36% of NOI • 58 MMBOE 2P Reserves • 60 MMBOE Best Estimate Contingent Resource Marcellus Shale Gas • $160 MM capital spending • 5% of production • 3% of NOI • 117 Bcfe 2P Reserves • 3.9 Tcfe Best Estimate Contingent Resource Based on 2011 outlook. Remaining percentages attributed to other conventional oil and gas properties 5
2010 Year-End Reserves Summary P+P Reserves Oil Properties (MMBOE) Gas Properties (Bcfe) Total (MMBOE) Opening Balance 171.8 1,039 344.9 Production (12.7) (105.4) (30.3) Divestments (23.4) (63.9) (34.0) Acquisitions 11 4.8 11.8 Additions 16.8 107.3 34.7 Revisions (2.6) (108.5) (20.7) Closing Balance 161.4 8<strong>68.</strong>9 306.2 • Majority of decline in 2010 due to dispositions • Development capital delivering results • All-in $17.46/BOE F&D before revisions • $10.74/BOE F&D at Ft Berthold • $1.64/Mcfe F&D at Marcellus • Revisions primarily in shallow gas properties • 40% of revisions due to price decline • Performance revisions at Shackleton ~ $100 MM PV10% - 2% of year-end NPV 6
Page 1 and 2: The Game Plan Enerplus Corporation
Page 3 and 4: Corporate Profile • Trading Symbo
Page 5: Significant Portfolio Repositioning
Page 9 and 10: Added Meaningful Upside Potential C
Page 11 and 12: 2011 Capital Focus Resource Play Ca
Page 13 and 14: Financial Outlook 900 800 Oil Gas A
Page 15 and 16: Crude Oil
Page 17 and 18: Bakken & Three Forks Geology Middle
Page 19 and 20: Fort Berthold, North Dakota Key Fac
Page 21 and 22: Fort Berthold Results Long laterals
Page 23 and 24: Significant Future Production Growt
Page 25 and 26: Waterfloods Key Facts OOIP P+P Rese
Page 27 and 28: Waterflood Development Plans • 20
Page 29 and 30: Marcellus Shale Gas Overview • Cu
Page 31 and 32: Marcellus Performance - Cumulative
Page 33 and 34: Marcellus Drilling Activity To Date
Page 35 and 36: Future Production Growth in the Mar
Page 37 and 38: Long-Term Strategy for Enerplus •
Page 39 and 40: 2011 Guidance Summary of 2011 Expec
Page 41 and 42: Cash Flow Sensitivity The sensitivi
Page 43 and 44: Reserves and Contingent Resources P
Page 45 and 46: Enerplus Ownership Canadian US & Fo
Page 47 and 48: Long-Term Debt ($ thousands) Decemb
Page 49 and 50: Fort Berthold Development Plans B 1
Page 51 and 52: Fort Berthold Well Costs Long Later
Page 53 and 54: Fort Berthold Production - Gatherin
Page 55 and 56: Supplemental Waterflood Information
Page 57 and 58:
Polymer Flood • Polymer is chemic
Page 59 and 60:
Dec-14 Dec-13 Dec-12 Dec-11 Dec-10
Page 61 and 62:
Giltedge - Polymer Project Costs an
Page 63 and 64:
Medicine Hat Glauc C - Production H
Page 65 and 66:
2011 Development Capital Plans at M
Page 67 and 68:
Freda Lake Ratcliffe Unit Freda Lak
Page 69 and 70:
Supplemental Marcellus Information
Page 71 and 72:
Marcellus Well Design • Drilling
Page 73 and 74:
Gathering Gas in the Marcellus NE P
Page 75 and 76:
Supplemental Deep Basin Information
Page 77 and 78:
Stacked Mannville Key Facts Key pro
Page 79 and 80:
Stacked Mannville Type Curve Econom
Page 81 and 82:
Montney Type Curve Economics AECO (
Page 83 and 84:
Disclaimers Assumptions All economi
Page 85:
Disclaimers NOTICE TO U.S. READERS
show all

68. RETAILTexasmarketingpresentationFINAL.pdf - Enerplus

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?