Board Packet 01 18 06 - Sonoma Marin Area Rail Transit - Home Page
Board Packet 01 18 06 - Sonoma Marin Area Rail Transit - Home Page
Board Packet 01 18 06 - Sonoma Marin Area Rail Transit - Home Page
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
V Public Comment on Non-Agenda Items<br />
Chair Jehn asked for public comment on items not appearing on the agenda. David<br />
Schonbrunn asked the <strong>Board</strong> to reconsider support of the proposed Caulfiled Lane<br />
crossing in Petaluma due to the availability of new information recently reviewed by the<br />
CPUC. He felt the <strong>Board</strong> and Real Estate Committee made a recommendation absent<br />
important information. Following discussion on this issue, Chair Jehn asked the <strong>Board</strong> for<br />
support for staff to revisit this information at a future Real Estate Committee meeting. Staff<br />
was directed to review the new data and report back to the committee.<br />
Anne Hutchins, Santa Rosa, expressed her support for the SMART project and thanked<br />
staff and the <strong>Board</strong> for their hard work and efforts to bring rail to the North Bay.<br />
VI SMART General Manager Report<br />
Ms. Hames noted that staff was continuing to send out DEIR documents. An additional<br />
100 cd’s were ordered. To date approximately 500 cd’s, 150 hard copies and 270 letters<br />
of notice had been distributed.<br />
VII Real Estate Committee Report<br />
Lucrecia Milla summarized the December 7th Real Estate meeting. She summarized a<br />
presentation to the committee by the Novato Chamber of Commerce regarding the Novato<br />
Depot Freight Building removal and an offering of a non-interest loan from Novato<br />
Chamber to support the removal of the building. The Real Estate Committee had<br />
supported this proposal and an agreement to proceed with the work will be brought back<br />
to the <strong>Board</strong> next month. The Cal Park Tunnel public meeting was summarized for the<br />
<strong>Board</strong>. Chair Jehn asked what has been the hold up with the NWP transfer. Ms. Hames<br />
stated that the documents were currently being signed by the <strong>Marin</strong> County <strong>Transit</strong><br />
District. Director Eklund asked what the status was on the Lalanne negotiation. Ms. Milla<br />
stated it would be discussed today during closed session.<br />
VIII Santa Rosa <strong>Rail</strong>road Square Developer RFP<br />
John Nemeth gave an overview of the draft <strong>Rail</strong>road Square RFP and the comments that<br />
had been received at the Real Estate Committee. He noted that last month staff brought a<br />
draft RFP to the <strong>Board</strong> for review. Since then Staff had received input from the Santa<br />
Rosa City Council, the Real Estate Committee and SMART’s new legal counsel, Hanson-<br />
Bridgett. One piece of input specifically mentioned was a letter from the City Manager of<br />
Santa Rosa expressing some concerns surrounding the financial feasibility of the <strong>Rail</strong>road<br />
Square project. Staff consequently requested Strategic Economics to look into the<br />
financial feasibility of the project.<br />
Dena Belzer, from Strategic Economics, was present and asked to speak to the issue of<br />
project feasibility. Focusing on the City Manager’s letter, she considered the fiscal impact<br />
of three provisions in the RFP: affordable housing, green building techniques and<br />
prevailing wage. Ms. Belzer reiterated there are tradeoffs the <strong>Board</strong> would be making in<br />
regards to what is requested and what revenues are likely to be generated by the project.<br />
It was her recommendation that the RFP be structured in a way that would give the<br />
developers flexibility in incorporating elements considered desirable by the <strong>Board</strong>, as<br />
opposed to threshold requirements.<br />
<strong>Page</strong> 2