24.11.2014 Views

Jetty Non Technical Summary - EDF Hinkley Point

Jetty Non Technical Summary - EDF Hinkley Point

Jetty Non Technical Summary - EDF Hinkley Point

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Mitigation<br />

6.3.8 In this EIA, those impacts assessed as being of potentially greater than minor adverse<br />

significance (i.e. impacts of moderate and major adverse significance) are the focus of<br />

mitigation, although every attempt has been taken to avoid, reduce and mitigate impacts<br />

through design change and adoption of best practice.<br />

6.3.9 The preferred hierarchy of mitigation is prevention first, then minimisation and, only as a<br />

last resort, compensation or remediation. The definitions of these are as follows:<br />

• prevention: avoid, relocate, modify the design and / or do not carry out the<br />

development;<br />

• reduction: introduce screens / blinds, modify design, alter technology, reduce size<br />

and scale of development etc; and<br />

• compensation or remediation: compensation to provide like-for-like replacement for<br />

any lost environmental elements (e.g. open green spaces, public facilities, wildlife<br />

area etc).<br />

6.3.10 Where possible, mitigation has been built into the jetty development (e.g. through the<br />

options chosen and through its design) and may be accepted, offset by other benefits of<br />

the jetty development or managed by the imposition of conditions within the HEO and/or<br />

on any licences granted.<br />

Residual Impacts<br />

6.3.11 The final step in the EIA process is the assessment of the residual impacts (i.e. those<br />

impacts remaining after the implementation (where necessary) of the proposed mitigation<br />

measures). Residual impacts are rated in accordance with the definitions of significance<br />

provided above. In this EIA, residual impacts assessed as minor or negligible are<br />

considered to be insignificant. More significant impacts may be accepted, offset by other<br />

benefits of the jetty development, or managed by the imposition of conditions within the<br />

HEO and / or on any licences granted.<br />

Cumulative Effects Assessment<br />

6.3.12 Cumulative effects are the additive and interactive effects that can arise from the jetty<br />

development cumulatively with other plans and projects. The EIA considers the jetty<br />

development cumulatively with the site preparation works, the <strong>Hinkley</strong> <strong>Point</strong> C Project,<br />

and other plans and projects which overlap in time and space (as regards those<br />

receptors that potentially could be affected).<br />

6.4 Consideration of Alternatives<br />

6.4.1 In accordance with the EIA Directive, an ES should outline the main alternatives<br />

considered by the applicant and present the main reasons for selecting the application<br />

site and design.<br />

No Development Alternative<br />

6.4.2 Proposed as Preliminary Works, the jetty development would allow <strong>EDF</strong> Energy to meet<br />

the target date of 2018 for the start of nuclear power generation by enabling the<br />

construction of <strong>Hinkley</strong> <strong>Point</strong> C to begin as early as possible after grant of the DCO. The<br />

2018 target is clearly set out in the draft National Policy Statements related to energy and<br />

<strong>Hinkley</strong> <strong>Point</strong> C Preliminary Works<br />

<strong>Non</strong> <strong>Technical</strong> <strong>Summary</strong><br />

Temporary <strong>Jetty</strong> Development 12 November 2010

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!