24.11.2014 Views

TOP AUDITING ISSUES FOR 2013 - CCH

TOP AUDITING ISSUES FOR 2013 - CCH

TOP AUDITING ISSUES FOR 2013 - CCH

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

MODULE 4 — CHAPTER 12 — Working with the New Codification of Statements on Auditing Standards (Clarified) 139<br />

Refer in the auditor’s report to management’s responsibility for determining<br />

the acceptability of the financial reporting framework, when<br />

management has a choice in determining the framework<br />

Describe in the auditor’s report, or refer to a note describing the purpose<br />

for which regulatory or contractual basis financial statements are prepared<br />

Include an emphasis-of-matter paragraph in the auditor’s report stating<br />

that the special purpose framework is a basis of accounting other<br />

than GAAP<br />

Include specific elements in the auditor’s report when that report is<br />

required by law or regulation to use a specific layout, form, or wording<br />

OBSERVATION<br />

As this course entered production, the AICPA released an exposure draft of proposed<br />

amendments to AU-C section 800. Those amendments would, if they became effective,<br />

add “a definite set of logical, reasonable criteria that is applied to all material items<br />

in the financial statements” to the bases of accounting defined as special purpose<br />

frameworks. Readers of this course should stay abreast of developments on this matter<br />

by referring to the AICPA’s Web site and to <strong>CCH</strong>’s Accounting Research Manager at www.<br />

accountingresearchmanager.com.<br />

Special Considerations in the United States (AU-C Sections 900–999)<br />

Changes in these sections are primarily formatting changes that do not entail<br />

new substantive requirements.<br />

IMPLEMENTATION CONSIDERATIONS<br />

Since the new Codification will generally be effective beginning with calendar<br />

year 2012 audits, which for many auditors means the first implementation<br />

will be for field work in very early <strong>2013</strong>, it is well to begin planning in advance<br />

for implementation. The transitional process will vary greatly according<br />

to a firm’s size and structure, and the nature of its auditing practice. The<br />

following considerations may be helpful in achieving a smooth transition.<br />

Develop Familiarity<br />

The first step toward effective implementation is to develop familiarity with<br />

the clarified standards. This includes the application and other explanatory<br />

material, appendixes, and exhibits. Identify those standards that apply to the<br />

firm’s practice and those that do not. Many firms, for example, may decline to<br />

participate in audits of group financial statements, or to perform compliance<br />

audits. For such firms, AU-C Section 600, Special Considerations—Audits of<br />

Group Financial Statements (including the Work of Component Auditors), and<br />

AU-C Section 935, Compliance Audits, would not be applicable.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!