24.11.2014 Views

TOP AUDITING ISSUES FOR 2013 - CCH

TOP AUDITING ISSUES FOR 2013 - CCH

TOP AUDITING ISSUES FOR 2013 - CCH

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

ANSWERS TO STUDY QUESTIONS — Module 4 — Chapter 12<br />

173<br />

c. Incorrect. It is correct that SAS 125 requires all identified instances of<br />

noncompliance to be reported. However, because there are additional<br />

reporting requirements associated with noncompliance, this is not the best<br />

of listed answers.<br />

d. Correct. SAS 125 requires that all identified instances of noncompliance<br />

to be reported. It also requires that the report refer to the specific<br />

covenants or paragraphs of the contract or regulation associated with<br />

the noncompliance.<br />

MODULE 4 — CHAPTER 12<br />

1. a. Incorrect. Auditing Interpretations are codified with a 9000-series<br />

number, followed by the number of the AU-C section to which they pertain.<br />

For example, the auditing interpretation entitled Audit Documentation:<br />

Auditing Interpretations of Section 230 is numbered as AU-C Section 9230.<br />

This Interpretation appears directly after AU-C Section 230 in the new<br />

Codification.<br />

b. Correct. The AU-C numbers are a temporary designation, to distinguish<br />

these sections from the previous AU sections during the transition period.<br />

They will revert to AU numbers in 2014, by which time their content<br />

will be fully effective for all engagements.<br />

c. Incorrect. Application and Other Explanatory Material paragraphs are<br />

designated by the letter A followed by a number, so that they can be readily<br />

distinguished from the content of the main body of each AU-C section.<br />

d. Incorrect. The numbering sequence for the AU-C sections roughly follows<br />

the chronology of a typical audit engagement. Thus, the sections for risk<br />

assessment, for example, appear before the sections for audit evidence and<br />

reporting.<br />

2. a. Incorrect. The clarified standard on audits of group financial statements<br />

focuses on how to conduct an effective audit of group financial statements,<br />

rather than on how to conduct an audit that involves other auditors. This<br />

standard better articulates the link between the risk assessment standards<br />

and group financial statement audits. It is significantly broader in scope<br />

than the previous standard.<br />

b. Correct. The clarified standard on related parties is actually frameworkneutral.<br />

It applies whether or not the entity’s financial reporting<br />

framework establishes requirements for related party disclosures.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!