24.11.2014 Views

TOP AUDITING ISSUES FOR 2013 - CCH

TOP AUDITING ISSUES FOR 2013 - CCH

TOP AUDITING ISSUES FOR 2013 - CCH

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

MODULE 1 — CHAPTER 3 — Performance Audits 35<br />

Sufficiency. This subsection requires that auditors should determine whether<br />

there is enough appropriate evidence to address audit objectives and to<br />

support audit findings and conclusions.<br />

While this determination is a matter of professional judgment, the Yellow<br />

Book notes that:<br />

The greater the audit risk, the greater the quality and quantity of evidence<br />

required.<br />

Stronger evidence may permit less evidence to be used.<br />

A large volume of evidence does not compensate for its lack of reliability,<br />

relevance, or validity.<br />

Overall assessment of evidence. This subsection requires that auditors should:<br />

Determine the overall sufficiency and appropriateness of evidence to<br />

provide a reasonable basis for their findings and conclusions.<br />

Perform and document an overall assessment of the collective evidence<br />

used to support their findings and conclusions. This assessment includes<br />

the results of any specific assessments conducted to conclude on the<br />

reliability and validity of specific evidence.<br />

Evaluate the expected significance of evidence to the audit’s objectives,<br />

findings, conclusions, the available corroborating evidence, and the<br />

audit risk.<br />

Developing elements of a finding. This subsection contains the requirement<br />

that auditors should plan and perform procedures to develop the elements<br />

of a finding necessary to address the audit objectives. It also lists and explains<br />

those elements.<br />

Criteria. Criteria are discussed in the section/subsection entitled Planning/<br />

Identifying audit criteria, above.<br />

Condition. A condition is the situation as it exists. A condition is<br />

determined and documented during the audit.<br />

Cause. The cause identifies reasons or explanations for the condition,<br />

and factors accounting for the differences between the criteria and the<br />

condition. These factors may serve as a basis for recommendations or<br />

corrective actions. They often include:<br />

Poorly designed policies, procedures or criteria<br />

Inconsistent, incorrect or incomplete implementation<br />

Factors beyond the control of program management<br />

Effect or potential effect. The effect is a clear and logical link that<br />

establishes the impact or potential impact of the difference between the<br />

criteria and the condition. It identifies the outcomes or consequences of<br />

the condition, and may be used to demonstrate the need for corrective<br />

action.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!