26.11.2014 Views

(CAMHS) and Schools - London Health Programmes

(CAMHS) and Schools - London Health Programmes

(CAMHS) and Schools - London Health Programmes

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

A strong ethos that came through from the case studies was that of working with those<br />

schools which are interested <strong>and</strong> committed to working in this way, <strong>and</strong> of it being an<br />

‘opt-in’ service. However, these may not be the schools that are in most need of the<br />

service; <strong>and</strong> there is an issue of how to roll out the service to other schools (or<br />

whether to target particularly needy areas).<br />

Although joint working is designed to improve co-ordination of services, this may not<br />

always prevent duplication of work. Currently, there are a lot of resources going into<br />

schools <strong>and</strong> there were some examples of schools being overwhelmed with other<br />

agencies coming in. Ways of co-ordinating this need to be identified <strong>and</strong> potential<br />

overlapping roles need to be explicitly clarified, for example the role of the EWOs,<br />

Educational Psychologists, <strong>and</strong> learning mentors with the Primary Mental <strong>Health</strong><br />

Workers or specialist Social workers. Examples of good practice show that these can<br />

be effectively negotiated with joint working.<br />

Managers expressed concern that this way of working was more complicated <strong>and</strong><br />

more difficult; with complex lines of accountability. This made it a more time<br />

consuming approach, especially for middle management, but also sometimes in<br />

service delivery.<br />

Most respondents identified that the increased accessibility of the service <strong>and</strong> earlier<br />

identification of problems meant an increase in referrals. This presents an increased<br />

dem<strong>and</strong> on the service, <strong>and</strong> problems of resource constraints.<br />

7.2 Recommendations<br />

Recommendations for action have been drawn from the literature review, survey <strong>and</strong><br />

case study research. This includes recommendations from survey respondents <strong>and</strong><br />

case study interviewees for others wishing to develop effective joint working between<br />

<strong>CAMHS</strong> <strong>and</strong> schools. These recommendations could be usefully explored by policy<br />

makers <strong>and</strong> planners within key government departments – education <strong>and</strong> health- <strong>and</strong><br />

by those involved in local <strong>CAMHS</strong> <strong>and</strong> education provision.<br />

National policy level<br />

• To ensure that greater emphasis is given at national level, across Government<br />

Departments, to the provision of preventive <strong>and</strong> early intervention mental<br />

health services for children <strong>and</strong> their families within school based <strong>and</strong> other<br />

community settings.<br />

• Within this, to ensure that the Children’s National Service Framework, <strong>and</strong><br />

particularly the <strong>CAMHS</strong> component of this, contains clear targets for the<br />

development of multi-agency early intervention supports for children <strong>and</strong> their<br />

families within schools.<br />

• To ensure that schools are given clear advice, guidance <strong>and</strong> support to promote<br />

children’s mental health within school settings from both health <strong>and</strong><br />

educational psychology services.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!