marine board report - Off Soundings

More documents

Recommendations

Info

SUMMARY OF FACTS 43 ANALYSIS 48 VESSEL STABILITY 48 ARCTIC ROSE POSITION AND HEADING 49 HEAD AND GUT OPERATION VERSUS PROCESSOR 50 CONCLUSIONS 52 RECOMMENDATIONS 56 APPENDICES a. Summary of Marine Board Activities b. HF Propagation Report c. Stability Analysis d. ROV Expeditions iii
LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1 Profile drawing of ARCTIC ROSE Figure 2 Hold Plan drawing of ARCTIC ROSE Figure 3 Location of machinery in main and auxiliary machinery spaces Figure 4 Drawing of Processing Space Figure 5 Main Deck Drawing Figure 6 Drawing of Weather Deck Figure 7 View of the primary steering station aboard F/V TENACITY Figure 8 Photo of PVC deck drain cap Figure 9 Factory Drawing showing location of sideshell penetrations Figure 10 Partially open overboard discharge chute on starboard side of ARCTIC ROSE Figure 11 Drawing showing locations of the weathertight or watertight doors and hatches Figure 12 Photo of SEA POWER Figure 13 Port view of TENACITY Figure 14 Profile drawing showing location of keel shoe Figure 15 Photo of “A” frame gantry Figure 16 Photo of Stability Vanes Figure 17 Photo of plate freezer similar to those aboard ARCTIC ROSE Figure 18 Photo of sump pump similar to those aboard the ARCTIC ROSE Figure 19 National Weather Service Surface Analysis for 4am April 2, 2001 Figure 20 National Weather Service Hindcast for 4am April 2, 2001. Figure 21 Graphic depiction of a Skip Zone Figure 22 Diagram of SafetyNET Network Figure 23 Deck Loading Table from ARCTIC ROSE Stability Booklet Figure 24 SNAME graphic stability chart Figure 25 Photo of Klein 5000 side scanning sonar Figure 26 Photo of Phantom HD2 ROV Figure 27 Picture from side scanning sonar of ARCTIC ROSE Figure 28 Photo of Arctic Rose Figure 29 Photo of MAXRover deployed during second expedition Figure 30 Photo of open weathertight door on aft bulkhead of processing space taken from ROV video Figure 31 Universal plotting sheet depicting relative position and heading of ARCTIC ROSE on April 1 and 2 iv
Page 1 and 2: INVESTIGATION INTO THE CIRCUMSTANCE
Page 3 and 4: Finding of Fact 16, paragraph 1: Co
Page 5 and 6: This item was resolved in November
Page 7 and 8: Action: We concur with this recomme
Page 9 and 10: (MSC) by the Commandant. Accordingl
Page 11 and 12: Action: We concur with this recomme
Page 13: c. Catcher - Processor Boat - Secon
Page 17 and 18: NAVTEX NM NMFS NOAA NOK NPFVOA NVIC
Page 19 and 20: Registered Depth: Place Constructed
Page 21 and 22: Name: G.W. Kandris Position: Asst.
Page 23 and 24: . Hold Level. The hold level contai
Page 25 and 26: cleaned of all viscera and blood. T
Page 27 and 28: Figure 5 Main Deck Drawing (Disrega
Page 29 and 30: The equipment locations were as bel
Page 31 and 32: facilitated the movement of the cat
Page 33 and 34: . Departure from St. Paul. The vess
Page 35 and 36: David Olney. There were no manageme
Page 37 and 38: d. Same Owner, New Operator. In 199
Page 39 and 40: Figure 18 Photo of sump pump simila
Page 41 and 42: 14. INDUSTRY STANDARDS AND GUIDELIN
Page 43 and 44: time. It is very likely the weather
Page 45 and 46: Figure 21 Graphic depiction of a Sk
Page 47 and 48: d. SafetyNET Receivers. There are t
Page 49 and 50: 18. COMMERCIAL FISHING VESSEL SAFET
Page 51 and 52: the NPFVOA, which is considered by
Page 53 and 54: unless the processing space is kept
Page 55 and 56: The Marine Board received testimony
Page 57 and 58: Figure 27 Picture from side scannin
Page 59 and 60: Open door from processor room to tr
Page 61 and 62: 17. Ten of the fifteen crew began w
Page 63 and 64: 55. The ARCTIC ROSE is sitting upri
Page 65 and 66:
ANALYSIS VESSEL STABILITY The Marin
Page 67 and 68:
Figure 31 Universal plotting sheet
Page 69 and 70:
CONCLUSIONS 1. The exact cause of t
Page 71 and 72:
9. The Marine Board identified a so
Page 73 and 74:
RECOMMENDATIONS Regulatory Changes
Page 75:
damage control, and training requir
Page 78 and 79:
MARINE BOARD SUMMARY OF ACTIONS The
Page 80 and 81:
Appendix 2 HF PROPAGATION REPORT 1
Page 82 and 83:
REAL TIME T INDICES FOR AUSTRALIAN
Page 84 and 85:
Appendix 3 STABILITY ANALYSIS 2 2 T
Page 86 and 87:
SCENARIO 1 PROGRESSIVE FLOODING INT
Page 88 and 89:
SCENARIOS THAT COULD LEAD TO THE LO
Page 90 and 91:
lose all positive stability. Even a
Page 92 and 93:
SCENARIO 3 PROGRESSIVE FLOODING INT
Page 94 and 95:
Page 96 and 97:
starboard of only 23°. Based on th
Page 98 and 99:
SCENARIO 5 THROUGH HULL FITTING FAI
Page 100 and 101:
Page 102 and 103:
Page 104 and 105:
SCENARIO 8 STRUCK OBJECT OR COLLISI
Page 106 and 107:
Page 108 and 109:
Page 110 and 111:
Page 112 and 113:
Conclusion 5. Based on the extremel
Page 114 and 115:
SCENARIO 12 LOSS OF KEEL BALLAST Me
Page 116 and 117:
SCENARIO 13 OVERLOADED WITH EXCESS
Page 118 and 119:
SCENARIO 14 STRUCTURAL FAILURE Meth
Page 120 and 121:
SCENARIO 15 SYNCHRONOUS ROLL Method
Page 122 and 123:
SCENARIO 16 SEVERE WIND CAPSIZES VE
Page 124 and 125:
SCENARIO 17 SWAMPING OF VESSEL DUE
Page 126 and 127:
SCENARIO 18 TRAWLING NET SNAGS ON B
Page 128 and 129:
SCENARIO 19 OVERLOADED DUE TO ICING
Page 130 and 131:
The Marine Board faced a daunting t
Page 132 and 133:
The voyage from Unalaska, Alaska to
Page 134:
The team arrived on-scene on August
show all

marine board report - Off Soundings

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?