marine board report - Off Soundings

More documents

Recommendations

Info

The existing stability vanes (see Figure 16), were removed. Figure 16 Photo of “Stability Vanes (1995) The processing space (See Figure 4) received a complete overhaul with all old equipment removed except for 2 plate freezers. The following new stainless steel equipment was installed: packing table with 2 Marel scales, wash tanks with incline conveyor, break tank gutting belt heading machine, bleeding bins, bleeding bin conveyor with incline conveyor, sorting belt with incline conveyors, dump box with incline conveyor and hydraulic sliding hatch, bleeding bins with three hydraulic doors. Tsurimi and Vaughn sump pumps were installed respectively on the port and starboard sides of the processing space. The deck of the processing space had steel framing and new fiberglass grating installed throughout. This grating was at a minimum of five inches off the floor. The by-catch and waste overboard discharge chutes were raised to four feet and five feet above the deck respectively. Both overboard chutes were fitted with closures. The by-catch chute was fitted with a manual guillotine type closure and the waste discharge chute was fitted with a flopper door. During the fall of 2000, the Cummins MDE was replaced with a Luger 6170. A Maxim model J10 water maker and Mitshubishi centrifuge diesel purifying system were installed in the auxiliary machinery space. The refrigeration system was completely overhauled. The Figure 17 Photo of plate freezer similar to those aboard ARCTIC ROSE (2001) 21
Figure 18 Photo of sump pump similar to those aboard the ARCTIC ROSE (2001) port and starboard freon accumulator tanks and associated piping were removed from the weather deck, as was the accumulator tank in the auxiliary machinery space. Two new 8’ x 4’ low side receivers and associated piping and control panels were installed in the auxiliary machinery space. The processing space received a Jackson 100 pan plate freezer, for a total of three pan plate freezers in this space. To accommodate the new freezer, a Dole 96 pan plate freezer was moved several feet to the starboard side. Associated piping was modified to accommodate this new installation. 12. UNALASKA OPERATIONS The ARCTIC ROSE predominantly operated out of Unalaska, delivering product to Offshore Systems Incorporated in Captains Bay or to trampers anchored in Captains Bay. Neither Arctic Sole Seafoods Incorporated or Arctic Rose LLC maintained an office in Unalaska. Cargo brokers and ship chandlers were contracted to move their cargo and provide supplies. Only minor or emergency repairs were conducted in Unalaska/Dutch Harbor and the company utilized the numerous vendors in Unalaska/Dutch Harbor to make repairs as needed. 13. FEDERAL REGULATIONS AND OVERSIGHT a. United States Coast Guard. The USCG enforces many laws and regulations that apply to commercial fishing vessels and their safety. A majority of the regulations are contained in Title 46, CFR Subchapter C, Uninspected Vessels. The safety regulations specifically for commercial fishing vessels are contained in Part 28, which is divided into seven Subparts A- G. The applicability of these subparts to a fishing vessel is based on their area of operation in regards to the boundary line, the number of persons on board and the type of operation performed on board (H & G vs. processor). Additional regulations governing safe navigation, pollution and prevention are found in Title 33, Parts 88, 151, and 155 respectively. Title 46 CFR Part 16 contains the chemical testing regulations for commercial vessel operations. The ARCTIC ROSE employed water in sorting and processing of fish, and as such was required to have an interlock installed to prevent the inadvertent flooding of the processing 22
Page 1 and 2: INVESTIGATION INTO THE CIRCUMSTANCE
Page 3 and 4: Finding of Fact 16, paragraph 1: Co
Page 5 and 6: This item was resolved in November
Page 7 and 8: Action: We concur with this recomme
Page 9 and 10: (MSC) by the Commandant. Accordingl
Page 11 and 12: Action: We concur with this recomme
Page 13 and 14: c. Catcher - Processor Boat - Secon
Page 15 and 16: LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1 Profile dr
Page 17 and 18: NAVTEX NM NMFS NOAA NOK NPFVOA NVIC
Page 19 and 20: Registered Depth: Place Constructed
Page 21 and 22: Name: G.W. Kandris Position: Asst.
Page 23 and 24: . Hold Level. The hold level contai
Page 25 and 26: cleaned of all viscera and blood. T
Page 27 and 28: Figure 5 Main Deck Drawing (Disrega
Page 29 and 30: The equipment locations were as bel
Page 31 and 32: facilitated the movement of the cat
Page 33 and 34: . Departure from St. Paul. The vess
Page 35 and 36: David Olney. There were no manageme
Page 37: d. Same Owner, New Operator. In 199
Page 41 and 42: 14. INDUSTRY STANDARDS AND GUIDELIN
Page 43 and 44: time. It is very likely the weather
Page 45 and 46: Figure 21 Graphic depiction of a Sk
Page 47 and 48: d. SafetyNET Receivers. There are t
Page 49 and 50: 18. COMMERCIAL FISHING VESSEL SAFET
Page 51 and 52: the NPFVOA, which is considered by
Page 53 and 54: unless the processing space is kept
Page 55 and 56: The Marine Board received testimony
Page 57 and 58: Figure 27 Picture from side scannin
Page 59 and 60: Open door from processor room to tr
Page 61 and 62: 17. Ten of the fifteen crew began w
Page 63 and 64: 55. The ARCTIC ROSE is sitting upri
Page 65 and 66: ANALYSIS VESSEL STABILITY The Marin
Page 67 and 68: Figure 31 Universal plotting sheet
Page 69 and 70: CONCLUSIONS 1. The exact cause of t
Page 71 and 72: 9. The Marine Board identified a so
Page 73 and 74: RECOMMENDATIONS Regulatory Changes
Page 75: damage control, and training requir
Page 78 and 79: MARINE BOARD SUMMARY OF ACTIONS The
Page 80 and 81: Appendix 2 HF PROPAGATION REPORT 1
Page 82 and 83: REAL TIME T INDICES FOR AUSTRALIAN
Page 84 and 85: Appendix 3 STABILITY ANALYSIS 2 2 T
Page 86 and 87: SCENARIO 1 PROGRESSIVE FLOODING INT
Page 88 and 89:
SCENARIOS THAT COULD LEAD TO THE LO
Page 90 and 91:
lose all positive stability. Even a
Page 92 and 93:
SCENARIO 3 PROGRESSIVE FLOODING INT
Page 94 and 95:
Page 96 and 97:
starboard of only 23°. Based on th
Page 98 and 99:
SCENARIO 5 THROUGH HULL FITTING FAI
Page 100 and 101:
Page 102 and 103:
Page 104 and 105:
SCENARIO 8 STRUCK OBJECT OR COLLISI
Page 106 and 107:
Page 108 and 109:
Page 110 and 111:
Page 112 and 113:
Conclusion 5. Based on the extremel
Page 114 and 115:
SCENARIO 12 LOSS OF KEEL BALLAST Me
Page 116 and 117:
SCENARIO 13 OVERLOADED WITH EXCESS
Page 118 and 119:
SCENARIO 14 STRUCTURAL FAILURE Meth
Page 120 and 121:
SCENARIO 15 SYNCHRONOUS ROLL Method
Page 122 and 123:
SCENARIO 16 SEVERE WIND CAPSIZES VE
Page 124 and 125:
SCENARIO 17 SWAMPING OF VESSEL DUE
Page 126 and 127:
SCENARIO 18 TRAWLING NET SNAGS ON B
Page 128 and 129:
SCENARIO 19 OVERLOADED DUE TO ICING
Page 130 and 131:
The Marine Board faced a daunting t
Page 132 and 133:
The voyage from Unalaska, Alaska to
Page 134:
The team arrived on-scene on August
show all

marine board report - Off Soundings

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?