28.11.2014 Views

GREEN CHEMISTRY

GREEN CHEMISTRY

GREEN CHEMISTRY

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chap. 1, Chemistry, Green Chemistry, and Environmental Chemistry 15<br />

will stagnate. The U.S. space program is an example of an area in which progress has<br />

been made only by a willingness to take risks. However, progress has probably been<br />

slowed because of risk aversion resulting from previous accidents, especially the 1987<br />

Challenger space shuttle tragedy. If we get to the point that no chemical can be made if<br />

its synthesis involves the use of a potentially toxic or otherwise hazardous substance,<br />

the progress of chemical science and the development of such beneficial products as<br />

new life-saving drugs or innovative chemicals for treating water pollutants may be held<br />

back. It may be argued that thermonuclear fusion entails significant risks as an energy<br />

source and that research on controlled thermonuclear fusion must therefore be stopped.<br />

But when that potential risk is balanced against the virtually certain risk of continuing<br />

to use fossil fuels that produce greenhouse gases that cause global climate warming,<br />

and it seems sensible to at least continue research on controlled thermonuclear fusion<br />

energy sources. Another example is the use of thermal processes for treating hazardous<br />

wastes, somewhat risky because of the potential for the release of toxic substances or air<br />

pollutants, but still the best way to convert many kinds of hazardous wastes to innocuous<br />

materials.<br />

1.9. WASTE PREVENTION<br />

Waste prevention is better than having to treat or clean up wastes. In the earlier<br />

years of chemical manufacture the direct costs associated with producing large quantities<br />

of wastes were very low because such wastes were simply discarded into waterways,<br />

onto the ground, or in the air as stack emissions. With the passage and enforcement<br />

of environmental laws after about 1970, costs for waste treatment increased steadily.<br />

General Electric has agreed to spend tens of millions of dollars to remove PCBs from<br />

Hudson River deposits that were discarded to the river as wastes from the company’s<br />

manufacture of electrical equipment. DuPont is paying up to $600 million as settlement<br />

for environmental damage caused by the production of Teflon and Gore-Tex. The cleanup<br />

of pollutants including asbestos, dioxins, pesticide manufacture residues, perchlorate<br />

and mercury are costing various concerns hundreds of millions of dollars. From a<br />

purely economic standpoint, therefore, a green chemistry approach that avoids these<br />

costs is very attractive, in addition to its large environmental benefits. By the year 2000<br />

in the United States, costs of complying with environmental and occupational health<br />

regulations had grown to a magnitude similar to that of research and development for<br />

industry as a whole.<br />

Although the costs of such things as engineering controls, regulatory compliance,<br />

personnel protection, wastewater treatment, and safe disposal of hazardous solid wastes<br />

have certainly been worthwhile for society and the environment, they have become a<br />

large fraction of the overall cost of doing business. Companies must now do full cost<br />

accounting, taking into full account the costs of emissions, waste disposal, cleanup, and<br />

protection of personnel and the environment, none of the proceeds of which go into the<br />

final product.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!