01.12.2014 Views

2009 SMS Pilot Project (SMSPP) Analysis - FAA

2009 SMS Pilot Project (SMSPP) Analysis - FAA

2009 SMS Pilot Project (SMSPP) Analysis - FAA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

In addition to the implementation plan, the organization should develop a written narrative in the<br />

DGA to describe the details of the implementation plan. Examples of what could go into the<br />

narrative are:<br />

• Responsible personnel for executing the <strong>SMS</strong> plan<br />

• Procedures and processes that need to be created or revised<br />

• Procedures for the company to determine if the procedures and/or processes meet the<br />

performance expectations and, if not, the necessary actions<br />

• Allocation of necessary resources<br />

• Expected completion date<br />

• A brief description of the manuals and procedures affected<br />

Some companies have created a high-level <strong>SMS</strong> manual that incorporates the general <strong>SMS</strong><br />

requirements that affects each organization. In the <strong>SMS</strong> manual, they have a matrix or index<br />

pointing to the procedures or processes that support the <strong>SMS</strong>.<br />

M<strong>SMS</strong> Team Observations on the Implementation Plans<br />

The implementation plan worksheet in the GAIPT was intended to be a simple way for the D&M<br />

organizations to document their plans and track their progress against the framework. Some<br />

participants used it, and others created a separate plan altogether.<br />

Figure 6-2 is a summaryof the results from eight of the participating D&M organizations. Eight<br />

organizations submitted completed DGAs. It compiles all of the participants’ gap analysis results<br />

with a percentage of where each company felt they were in compliance to the <strong>SMS</strong> framework<br />

requirements. This chart only remains accurate until the pilot project organizations begin<br />

executing their implementation plan. Once the gaps begin to close, the percentages below will<br />

change.<br />

Figure 6-2: Detailed Gap <strong>Analysis</strong><br />

Detailed Gap <strong>Analysis</strong> Results NP P DOC I DEM<br />

Component 1.0 Safety Policy and Objectives<br />

The organization developed and implements an<br />

62% 38%<br />

integrated, comprehensive <strong>SMS</strong> for its entire<br />

organization and will incorporate a procedure to identify<br />

and maintain compliance with current safety-related<br />

legal and regulatory requirements. The safety policy is<br />

Element 1.1 Safety Policy<br />

Top management defines the organization’s safety policy 25% 50% 12% 12%<br />

and convey its expectations and objectives to its<br />

employees<br />

Element 1.2 Management Commitment and Safety Accountabilities<br />

Management defines, documents, and communicates the 25% 50% 12% 12%<br />

safety roles, responsibilities, and authorities throughout<br />

its organization.<br />

Element 1.3 Designation and Responsibilities of Required Safety Management Personnel.<br />

28

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!