02.12.2014 Views

Experiments That Changed Nutritional Thinking - TUUM EST

Experiments That Changed Nutritional Thinking - TUUM EST

Experiments That Changed Nutritional Thinking - TUUM EST

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

1040S<br />

SUPPLEMENT<br />

TABLE 1<br />

TABLE 2<br />

Effects of food restriction on life span of rats1<br />

Effects of food restriction on the weight and density of the<br />

femur of rats1<br />

Median age<br />

Group Ave. age at death Group Mean weight Density<br />

d<br />

I Unrestricted<br />

Males (n Å 11) 0.741 1.22<br />

I Unrestricted Females (n Å 18) 0.540 1.21<br />

Males (n Å 14) 483 522 II Restricted at weaning<br />

Females (n Å 22) 801 820 Males (n Å 7) 0.486 1.15<br />

II Restricted at weaning Females (n Å 13) 0.398 1.13<br />

Males (n Å 13) 820 797 III Restricted 2 wk after weaning<br />

Females (n Å 23) 775 904 Males (n Å 9) 0.484 1.09<br />

III Restricted 2 wk after weaning Females (n Å 10) 0.432 1.14<br />

Males (n Å 15) 894 919<br />

Females2 (n Å 19) 826 894 1 Data taken from McCay et al. (1935).<br />

1 Data taken from McCay et al. (1935).<br />

2 Two female rats in this group died at a young age due to high Table 2 provides data regarding the weight and density of the<br />

temperatures in the animal room. They were not included in the calcula- femur at the time of death.<br />

tion of results.<br />

Confirmation of the Relationship of Diet to Longevity<br />

publishing the first report from this work in 1934 while some<br />

In a second experiment, McCay and his group fed all rats<br />

of the rats were yet alive (McCay and Crowell 1934). McCay<br />

and his co-author remarked on the long-held viewpoint that<br />

identical amounts of a nutrient-dense diet, feeding that<br />

nutrition and life span were related (Darby 1990). Yet, they<br />

amount required to just maintain the weight of the restricted<br />

rats. This allowed them to determine whether the unlimited<br />

noted, the science of nutrition had focused on the young,<br />

consumption of a nutrient-dense diet had shortened the life<br />

growing animal to the exclusion of the study of the adult or<br />

of the control group from the first experiment, and they conaging<br />

animal.<br />

cluded it had not. The growth of the rats was controlled by<br />

They wrote: ‘‘In this day when both children and animals<br />

varying the amount of a mixture of sucrose, cooked starch and<br />

are being fed to attain a maximum growth rate, it seems a<br />

lard (38:57:5) that was fed, with the control rats being allowed<br />

little short of heresy to present data in favor of the ancient<br />

to eat as much as they chose. In addition, the control group<br />

theory that slow growth favors longevity.’’ They cited the earwas<br />

divided, with half the rats being fed cod liver oil and half<br />

lier work of Osborne et al. (1917) and their own previous<br />

(as well as all rats with restricted intakes) being fed irradiated<br />

observations that trout with very low protein intake ‘‘failed to<br />

grow [but remained alive and] lived twice as long as those<br />

yeast and carotene as sources of fat-soluble vitamins. Supple-<br />

mentation with these different sources of fat-soluble nutrients<br />

that grew.’’ They postulated that ‘‘something was consumed<br />

in growth that is essential for the maintenance of life’’ (McCay<br />

and Crowell 1934).<br />

Accordingly, McCay and Crowell selected from their colony<br />

TABLE 3<br />

106 rats, both male and female, and divided them into<br />

Effects of various lengths of food restriction on<br />

three groups. They fed them all the same nutrient-dense diet<br />

the life span of rats1<br />

from the time of weaning. However, Group I was fed unlimited<br />

amounts of the diet, whereas the others were fed restricted<br />

Age at death<br />

amounts of the diet, either from the time of weaning (Group<br />

II) or after 2 wk (Group III). Restricted rats were maintained<br />

at a constant weight until once about every 100 d when they<br />

Group Ave. Range<br />

were allowed to grow about 10 g because of the feeding of<br />

d<br />

sucrose or beef liver to all rats.<br />

I Unrestricted2<br />

A full report was published on this initial experiment a year Males (n Å 17) 670 308–896<br />

after the preliminary report (McCay et al. 1935). Table 1 presents Females (n Å 16) 643 404–965<br />

data concerning the length of life of these rats. The female rats II Restricted until d 300<br />

that were fed unrestricted amounts of diet lived significantly Males (n Å 4) 865 805–1018<br />

longer than the comparable males (median age at death 820 vs Females (n Å 5) 811 555–1183<br />

522 d). Male rats that were fed restricted amounts of diet, how-<br />

Restricted until d 500<br />

Males (n Å 5) 806 366–1103<br />

ever, lived as long, and in some cases longer, than did the females Females (n Å 5) 990 793–1078<br />

whose intake was restricted. The life of the male rats was clearly Restricted until d 700<br />

lengthened by food restriction and the slower rate of growth, Males (n Å 4) 874 772–1025<br />

whereas the life of the slower-growing females was not lengthened Females (n Å 6) 912 406–1320<br />

greatly, if at all, by food restriction.<br />

Restricted until d 1000<br />

McCay et al. (1935) also observed the effects of food restric-<br />

Males (n Å 5) 882 336–1127<br />

Females (n Å 4) 1033 815–1320<br />

tion on the growth and composition of several tissues. Their<br />

most striking observation was of the fragility of the bones taken 1 Data taken from McCay et al. (1939).<br />

from the rats fed restricted amounts of diet. They reported that<br />

2 Data for controls, fed either carotene / irradiated yeast or cod<br />

some of the bones ‘‘crumbled in the course of dissection.’’ liver oil, were combined.<br />

/ 4p09$$0062 04-07-97 14:02:12 nutras LP: J Nut May Suppl<br />

Downloaded from jn.nutrition.org by on June 3, 2010

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!