02.12.2014 Views

Experiments That Changed Nutritional Thinking - TUUM EST

Experiments That Changed Nutritional Thinking - TUUM EST

Experiments That Changed Nutritional Thinking - TUUM EST

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

1048S<br />

SUPPLEMENT<br />

TABLE 1<br />

The first experiment on the effect of diet on radiation mortality in guinea pigs1<br />

Radiation dose (R)<br />

100 150 200 250 300 350 400 500<br />

mortality, %<br />

Cabbage — — 0 10 25 50 75 100<br />

Beets 2.5 — 100 — 100 — 100 —<br />

1 Data from Lourau and Lartigue (1950).<br />

in the two groups, at equal radiation doses, animals fed beets control group would have allowed them to distinguish between<br />

had more severe and widespread hemorrhages than those fed their two explanations (toxic substances in beets vs. protective<br />

cabbage.<br />

substances in cabbage).<br />

The authors proposed two explanations for the dietary effect Spector and Calloway used an oat and bran control diet and<br />

on radiosensitivity. They suggested that 1) cabbage may con- the control diet supplemented with beets, cabbage or broccoli.<br />

tain substances that protect against radiation damage, such as They irradiated their four groups of guinea pigs with a radiation<br />

vitamins P and C; or 2) beets may contain substances that dose of 400 R. Their results are shown in Table 3. Although<br />

become toxic after irradiation. They preferred the second explanation,<br />

beet consumption did not affect mortality, consumption of<br />

that beets were toxic to irradiated guinea pigs. This either cabbage or broccoli significantly reduced mortality from<br />

was supported by the observation that the LD 50 for the animals irradiation. Thus, they proved that Lourau and Lartigue were<br />

consuming beets was about 150 R, considerably lower than incorrect in their conclusion that beets contained a toxic substance<br />

the usually reported LD 50 of 250 R.<br />

and that Duplan was correct as to the protective effects<br />

A few years later, M. Jean-Francois Duplan showed that in of cabbage.<br />

fact, Lourau and Lartigue’s first explanation was correct, that Calloway and colleagues went on to investigate the sub-<br />

cabbage did offer protection against radiation damage (Duplan stance conferring the protective effects (Calloway et al. 1963).<br />

1953). Duplan studied 70 male guinea pigs fed oat and bran Because the basal diet was devoid of vitamin A, and animals<br />

diets. The test diets were supplemented with either cabbage consuming this diet were known to become vitamin A deficient,<br />

or carrots in this study, and the animals received a single<br />

they suggested that sources of vitamin A might be able<br />

radiation dose.<br />

to decrease the radiosensitivity of guinea pigs. Their results<br />

The results of Duplan are shown in Table 2. For a given are shown in Table 3. In this experiment, they confirmed<br />

radiation dose, the animals consuming cabbage had much previous findings that both cabbage and broccoli lowered mortality<br />

lower mortality than those consuming carrots. He saw no differences<br />

in irradiated animals. They found that a number of other<br />

in lesions, but he did note that the animals consuming b-carotene–containing foods also exerted some beneficial effects.<br />

carrots lost much more weight than those consuming cabbage.<br />

Mortality after 20 d was significantly lowered by concarrots<br />

Duplan’s results suggested that Lourau and Lartigue may sumption of the b-carotene–containing vegetables that they<br />

have been incorrect in concluding that beets contained a toxic tested. Beets, apples and white potatoes had no effect. Supple-<br />

substance. Rather than concluding that carrots contained a mentation with all essential vitamins reduced mortality somewhat,<br />

toxic substance, Duplan concluded that cabbage lowered the<br />

but not to the same degree as supplementation with<br />

radiosensitivity of guinea pigs. He speculated that the radioprotective<br />

substances may have been antioxidant goitrogens present<br />

in the cabbage.<br />

Spector and Calloway (1959) continued this investigation<br />

TABLE 3<br />

of the dietary factors that protect against radiation damage. Further experiments on the effect of diet on radiation<br />

They very importantly noted that Lourau and Lartigue did not<br />

mortality in guinea pigs<br />

have a control group in their experiment. The addition of a<br />

Mortality at 20 d after irradiation<br />

with 400 R<br />

TABLE 2<br />

The second experiment on the effect of diet on radiation<br />

mortality in guinea pigs1<br />

Radiation dose (R)<br />

300 500 1000<br />

mortality, %<br />

Cabbage 0 6.5 87.5<br />

Carrots 50 86 —<br />

1 Data from Duplan (1953).<br />

Spector and<br />

Calloway et al.<br />

Supplement Calloway (1959) (1963)<br />

mortality, %<br />

None 100 97<br />

Beets 90 —<br />

Cabbage 50 54<br />

Broccoli 35 42<br />

Alfalfa 0<br />

Mustard greens 12<br />

Green beans 31<br />

Lettuce 44<br />

All vitamins 72<br />

/ 4p09$$0062 04-07-97 14:02:12 nutras LP: J Nut May Suppl<br />

Downloaded from jn.nutrition.org by on June 3, 2010

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!