25.12.2014 Views

University of Aarhus ECOTOURISM AS A WAY TO PROTECT ...

University of Aarhus ECOTOURISM AS A WAY TO PROTECT ...

University of Aarhus ECOTOURISM AS A WAY TO PROTECT ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Ecotourism as a sustainable way to protect nature<br />

hunting privileges, it treated all landowners equally, whether white or African”<br />

(Carruthers, 1995).<br />

The Transvaal Game Protection Association (a group <strong>of</strong> Englishmen who<br />

worked to protect wildlife in the name <strong>of</strong> a class sport as hunting) became an<br />

important pressure group. They tried to convince the authorities about the basic<br />

idea that wildlife was in danger because <strong>of</strong> the native Africans, in saying so,<br />

they could maintain the elitism <strong>of</strong> their sport. Since the very first moment, this<br />

has been shown not to be true and on the contrary “…the over protection <strong>of</strong><br />

game in some parts….have resulted in the most disastrous consequences to the<br />

Natives who had in many cases lost their whole crops” (Carruthers, 1995).<br />

The situation in Kruger National Park (KNP) was as follows: a white<br />

colonialist minority who took the KNP under control to protect wildlife for<br />

game hunting was against a majority <strong>of</strong> black natives who had lost their land<br />

(and therefore the only opportunity to survive) simply to protect the white’s way<br />

<strong>of</strong> living.<br />

To create this National Park, thousands <strong>of</strong> Africans were evicted from<br />

their lands and “…not only were (they) forcibly moved to overcrowded and<br />

marginal agricultural lands on the periphery <strong>of</strong> these new reserves; colonial laws<br />

also denied them hunting and fishing licences and the right to use firearms or<br />

hunting dogs. They were also forbidden to kill wildlife that wandered outside<br />

the reserves and destroy their crops and domestic animals, and they were banned<br />

from collecting any wood or grasses within the reserves. Invariably, the colonial<br />

state chose to protect wildlife instead <strong>of</strong> the local Africans. In times <strong>of</strong> drought<br />

or when water was scarce, Africans were forced to move out” (Honey, 1999).<br />

But “Preventing Africans from hunting was not merely an economic strategy; it<br />

was embedded in white cultural perceptions. Whites generally regarded Africans<br />

59

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!