08.11.2012 Views

multivariate production systems optimization - Stanford University

multivariate production systems optimization - Stanford University

multivariate production systems optimization - Stanford University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The hydrostatic head component of the total pressure gradient is then<br />

dP g<br />

=<br />

dZ HH gC ρL HL + ρG HG = g<br />

gC ρS<br />

To determine the friction component, they proposed to use<br />

dP =<br />

dZ F<br />

fM<br />

2<br />

ρS VM 2 gC D<br />

where the Moody friction factor is obtained using a Reynold’s number of<br />

Re = ρL VM D<br />

μL<br />

The acceleration component was considered to be negligible in the bubble flow regime.<br />

Therefore, the total pressure gradient for the bubble flow regime is given by<br />

3.4.2 Slug Flow Regime<br />

dP =<br />

dZ BUB<br />

dP +<br />

dZ HH<br />

dP<br />

dZ F<br />

30<br />

(3.54)<br />

(3.55)<br />

(3.56)<br />

(3.57)<br />

The density component in the slug flow regime uses the same definition for liquid holdup<br />

and V BF employed in the bubble flow regime. However, V BS is defined as<br />

where<br />

VBS = C g D ρL - ρG<br />

ρL<br />

1 2<br />

C = 0.345 1 - exp -0.029 NV 1 - exp<br />

NE = g D ρL - ρG<br />

σL<br />

NV = g D3 ρL ρL - ρG 1 2<br />

μL<br />

where m in Equation 3.59 is evaluated as follows:<br />

N V<br />

m<br />

3.37 - NE<br />

m<br />

(3.58)<br />

(3.59)<br />

(3.60)<br />

(3.61)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!