08.11.2012 Views

multivariate production systems optimization - Stanford University

multivariate production systems optimization - Stanford University

multivariate production systems optimization - Stanford University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Table 4.1: Empirical Coefficients for Two-Phase Critical Flow Correlations.<br />

Correlation A B C<br />

Gilbert (1954) 10.00 0.546 1.89<br />

Baxendall (1957) 9.56 0.546 1.93<br />

Ros (1959) 17.40 0.500 2.00<br />

Achong (1961) 3.82 0.650 1.88<br />

Omana et al. (1969), Fortunati (1972), Ashford & Pierce (1975), and Sachdeva et al.<br />

(1986). It should be pointed out that only Fortunati (1972), Ashford & Pierce (1975), and<br />

Sachdeva et al. (1986) have attempted to model both critical and subcritical flow.<br />

Ros (1960) extended the work of Tangeren (1949) to account for mist flow where<br />

gas is the continuous phase. Ros (1960) demonstrated that accelerational effects dominate<br />

choke behavior and that slippage effects are negligible. Poetmann & Beck (1963)<br />

converted the Ros (1960) equation to field units and presented it as a series of nomographs.<br />

Omana et al. (1969) conducted experiments with water and natural gas flowing<br />

through restrictions. They performed a dimensional analysis that yielded eight<br />

dimensionless groups to characterize the flow. A regression analysis produced an<br />

empirical correlation based on five of these dimensionless groups. The Omana (1969)<br />

correlation was never widely accepted because it was based on small diameters (4 to 14 /<br />

64ths of an inch), low flow rates (800 bpd maximum), low pressure (400 to 1000 psig),<br />

and the correlation was developed for a water-gas mixture as opposed to an oil-gas<br />

mixture.<br />

Fortunati (1972) demonstrated how to apply the findings of Guzhov and<br />

Medviediev (1962) to model the performance of a surface choke. Guzhov and Medviediev<br />

(1962) developed a curve relating the velocity of the mixture, VM , to the pressure ratio of<br />

downstream pressure to upstream pressure, P2 / P1 , where P1 was constant at 19.8 psia.<br />

Fortunati (1972) showed how to correct the the mixture velocity for the actual downstream<br />

pressure. Having the corrected velocity of the mixture, the determination of the liquid<br />

45

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!