08.11.2012 Views

multivariate production systems optimization - Stanford University

multivariate production systems optimization - Stanford University

multivariate production systems optimization - Stanford University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The Orkiszewski gradient maps appear in Figures 7.8 and 7.9. Here the boundaries<br />

between all four flow regions are very distinct. For more information on the multiphase<br />

flow component used in this well model, see Chapter 3.<br />

7.1.4 Developing the Choke Component<br />

After the reservoir and flowstring components were completed, we next developed a<br />

component to model the surface choke. A surprising degree of difficulty was encountered<br />

at this stage. Recall from Chapter 4 that a surface choke is a binary device: it operates in<br />

either critical flow or subcritical flow. Also recall that in critical flow the flow rate through<br />

the choke is independent of the downstream pressure. Thus a discontinuity occurs at the<br />

critical-subcritical flow boundary. Since the well model was to be used in an iterative<br />

fashion, the surface choke component would have to be applicable to all flow conditions,<br />

both critical and subcritical. Much to our dismay, we discovered after researching the<br />

techniques available that although good correlations are available for single phase flow<br />

across chokes, good correlations for multiphase flow across chokes are rare. Of the<br />

correlations that are available, most are strictly for critical flow.<br />

Nodal analysis handles the surface choke discontinuity by avoiding it. In nodal<br />

analysis, the separator pressure is specified and then related to the pressure downstream of<br />

the choke by a horizontal flow correlation. Then the pressure drop across the choke is<br />

obtained by assuming that the choke is always in critical flow and using an empirical<br />

correlation. Notice that by specifying the downstream pressure and then calculating the<br />

upstream pressure, this procedure manages to determine both the upstream and<br />

downstream pressures in critical flow. If we specified the upstream pressure and tried to<br />

determine the downstream pressure during critical flow, the best we can do is to ascertain<br />

the maximum downstream pressure.<br />

Assuming that the choke is always in critical flow was rejected as an option for this<br />

well model. An attempt was made to devise a method to handle both critical and subcritical<br />

flow. One of the few correlations to make an attempt at modeling both critical and<br />

subcritical flow is the Sachdeva et al. (1986) choke model. With a few modifications to the<br />

algorithm, the Sachdeva et al. (1986) model was able to be incorporated into the well<br />

model. During critical flow through the choke, the downstream pressure was determined<br />

by assuming the choke to be at the critical-subcritical boundary. This assumption allowed<br />

the critical pressure ratio to determine the downstream pressure. See Chapter 4 for details.<br />

88

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!