27.12.2014 Views

Community Junior Sport Coaching final report - 2009

Community Junior Sport Coaching final report - 2009

Community Junior Sport Coaching final report - 2009

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Coaches’ in Action<br />

The behaviours exhibited by junior coaches during rugby league and rugby union training sessions<br />

were investigated using videoed systematic observation. This information together with the results<br />

from the modified coach rating scale will provide a greater understanding of the junior coaching<br />

environment. <strong>Coaching</strong> behaviours <strong>report</strong>ed in the literature have predominantly been from the<br />

perspective of athletic success and efficiency of coaching (Bloom et al., 1999; Claxton, 1988; Horton<br />

et al., 2005; Lacy and Darst, 1985). All studies have been conducted in a different sporting context –<br />

predominantly in the USA, UK and Europe and examining high school through to professional<br />

coaching practice making it difficult ficult to compare the coaching behaviours <strong>report</strong>ed here to those in<br />

the literature. There is no comparison of coaches at an individual level due to the unique context of<br />

each sporting environment but rather looking at the sample of 37 coaches collectively.<br />

Figure 4-2 indicates that the two dominant coaching behaviours displayed are instructing and<br />

observing players. Together this accounts for 65% of all training sessions. The coaches exhibit<br />

affective behaviours (feedback – positive, ive, negative or general; scold, hustle and humour) for 15% of<br />

the training session closely followed by managing or organising players (13%). Previous research<br />

<strong>report</strong>s that instruction is the most frequently used behaviour regardless of the level or age of the<br />

athlete (Claxton, 1988; Cushion and Jones, 2001; Liukkonen et al., 1996; Mesquita et al., 2008;<br />

Seagrave and Ciancio, 1990; Tharp and Gallimore, 1976; Vangucci et al., 1997).<br />

% Total Training Time<br />

2%<br />

5%<br />

15%<br />

48%<br />

Instructions<br />

Management/Organisation<br />

17%<br />

Observation<br />

Not on task<br />

13%<br />

Affective behaviour<br />

uncodable<br />

Figure 4-2 Coaches behaviour during the training session measured by systematic observation<br />

Table 4-8 outlines the frequency, duration, and percentage breakdown for each of the 16 coaching<br />

behaviours. Specifically column 2 indicates the average number of times each behaviour was<br />

<strong>Junior</strong> <strong>Community</strong> <strong>Coaching</strong> Report December <strong>2009</strong><br />

37

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!