printmgr file

CHECK POINT SOFTWARE
FORM 20-F DFN ON-BOA
ˆ200FDMqk04d==nK76Š
200FDMqk04d==nK7
RR Donnelley ProFile wcrdoc1
10.10 WCRjacis0in 26-Mar-2012 14:39 EST
229899 FIN 16 1*
PAL
09-Apr-2012 13:21 EST CURR
PS IFV 1C
CHECK POINT SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGIES LTD.
AND ITS SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 2:- SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Cont.)
future undiscounted cash flows the asset (or asset group) is expected to generate. If the asset is
considered to be impaired, the amount of any impairment is measured as the difference between the
carrying value and the fair value of the impaired asset. During 2009, 2010 and 2011, no impairment
loss was recorded.
In determining the fair values of long-lived assets for purpose of measuring impairment, the
Company’s assumptions include those that market participants will consider in valuations of similar
assets.
i. Business combinations:
The Company accounts for business combinations in accordance with ASC No. 805, “Business
Combinations”. ASC 805 requires recognition of assets acquired, liabilities assumed, and any
non-controlling interest at the acquisition date, measured at their fair values as of that date. The ASC
also requires the fair value of acquired in-process research and development (“IPR&D”) to be recorded
as an indefinite life intangible asset (subject to impairment) until the research and developments efforts
are either completed or abandoned, and restructuring and acquisition-related costs to be expensed as
incurred. Any excess of the fair value of net assets acquired over the purchase price and any subsequent
changes in estimated contingencies are to be recorded in earnings. In addition, changes in valuation
allowance related to acquired deferred tax assets and acquired income tax positions are to be
recognized in earnings.
j. Research and development costs:
Research and development costs are charged to the statement of income as incurred. ASC 985-20,
“Software- Costs of Software to Be Sold, Leased, or Marketed”, requires capitalization of certain
software development costs subsequent to the establishment of technological feasibility.
Based on the Company’s product development process, technological feasibility is established upon
completion of a working model. Costs incurred by the Company between completion of the working
models and the point at which the products are ready for general release, have been insignificant.
Therefore, all research and development costs are expensed as incurred.
k. Revenue recognition:
The Company derives its revenues mainly from products, licenses, combined hardware and software
products, software updates and maintenance and subscriptions. The Company’s products are generally
integrated with software that is essential to the functionality of the equipment. The Company sells its
products primarily through channel partners including distributors, resellers, OEMs, system integrators
and MSPs, all of whom are considered end-users. The Company also sells its products directly to end
users primarily through its web site.
Starting January 1, 2011 the Company adopted the guidance of ASU 2009-14, Certain Arrangements
That Include Software Elements, (amendments to FASB ASC Topic 985, Software) (“ASU 2009-14”)
and ASU 2009-13, Multiple-Deliverable Revenue Arrangements, (amendments to FASB ASC Topic
605, Revenue Recognition) (“ASU 2009-13”). ASU 2009-14 removes tangible products from the scope
of software revenue guidance and provides guidance on determining whether software deliverables in
an arrangement that includes a tangible product are covered by the scope of the software revenue
guidance. ASU 2009-13 requires entities to allocate revenue in an arrangement using estimated selling
prices of the delivered goods and services based on a selling price hierarchy. The amendment
F-16