09.11.2012 Views

Characteristics of Work-Related Injuries and Illnesses in ... - Maine.gov

Characteristics of Work-Related Injuries and Illnesses in ... - Maine.gov

Characteristics of Work-Related Injuries and Illnesses in ... - Maine.gov

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Occupational Groups<br />

<strong>Characteristics</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Work</strong>-related <strong>Injuries</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Illnesses</strong> <strong>in</strong> Ma<strong>in</strong>e 1999_________________<br />

In 1999, over 63% <strong>of</strong> all disabl<strong>in</strong>g cases <strong>in</strong>volved<br />

employees <strong>in</strong> four occupational groups: (1) Service<br />

occupations; (2) Precision Production, Craft, <strong>and</strong> Repair<br />

occupations (<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g all mechanics, construction<br />

trades workers, precision metal workers, <strong>and</strong><br />

plant <strong>and</strong> system operators); (3) H<strong>and</strong>lers, Equipment<br />

Cleaners, <strong>and</strong> Laborers (<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g trades helpers,<br />

mach<strong>in</strong>e feeders, <strong>of</strong>fbearers, stock clerks, <strong>and</strong><br />

packers); <strong>and</strong> (4) Mach<strong>in</strong>e Operators, Assemblers,<br />

<strong>and</strong> Inspectors.<br />

Figure 2 shows the percentages <strong>of</strong> 1999 disabl<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Percent <strong>of</strong> Disabl<strong>in</strong>g Cases<br />

Figure 2.<br />

22<br />

20<br />

18<br />

16<br />

14<br />

12<br />

10<br />

8<br />

6<br />

4<br />

2<br />

0<br />

18.4<br />

18.7<br />

Service<br />

occupations<br />

18.1<br />

17.9<br />

Prod. craft &<br />

repair<br />

15.3<br />

16.6<br />

H<strong>and</strong>ler, eq.<br />

cleaner, laborer<br />

Occupational Groups<br />

Percent <strong>of</strong> Disabl<strong>in</strong>g Cases, Ma<strong>in</strong>e, 1990-1998, 1999<br />

13.8<br />

Mach<strong>in</strong>e operator<br />

10.2<br />

1990-1998 1999<br />

8.6<br />

9.3<br />

Transport. & mat.<br />

h<strong>and</strong>ler<br />

6.1<br />

6.7<br />

Adm supportclerical<br />

cases for occupational groups as compared to the<br />

1990-1998 average. This figure shows if 1999 disabl<strong>in</strong>g<br />

cases are <strong>in</strong> l<strong>in</strong>e with the 9-year average or if<br />

new trends may be develop<strong>in</strong>g. The largest group<br />

decrease was <strong>in</strong> the Mach<strong>in</strong>e Operator, Assembler<br />

<strong>and</strong> Inspector group, which accounted for an average<br />

<strong>of</strong> 13.8% <strong>of</strong> lost-time <strong>in</strong>juries <strong>and</strong> illnesses for 1990-<br />

1998 <strong>and</strong> 10.2% <strong>in</strong> 1999.<br />

See Table 1 on page 5 for data on occupational<br />

groups <strong>and</strong> Table 14 on page 37 for a more detailed<br />

list <strong>of</strong> specific occupations.<br />

_________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

Ma<strong>in</strong>e Department <strong>of</strong> Labor 4<br />

Bureau <strong>of</strong> Labor St<strong>and</strong>ards<br />

4.2<br />

5.1<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>essional<br />

specialty<br />

Occupational Groups<br />

4.7<br />

4.8<br />

Sales<br />

occupations<br />

3.1<br />

2.7<br />

Farm<strong>in</strong>g, fish<strong>in</strong>g,<br />

forestry<br />

2.8<br />

2.5<br />

Protective<br />

service occ.<br />

2.5<br />

2.5<br />

Executive adm<strong>in</strong>.<br />

& mangerial<br />

1.6<br />

1.7<br />

Technical<br />

support<br />

0.9<br />

1.3<br />

All others

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!