30.12.2014 Views

70-years-chart-illustrates-the-dominance-by-the-cfr-trilaterals-bilderbergers

70-years-chart-illustrates-the-dominance-by-the-cfr-trilaterals-bilderbergers

70-years-chart-illustrates-the-dominance-by-the-cfr-trilaterals-bilderbergers

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Do you expect to see not just India and China brought into universal institutions, but do<br />

you expect to see any sort of institutions directly and specifically engaging <strong>the</strong>m, as<br />

individual countries, in a way that we brought Japan into something like <strong>the</strong> Trilateral<br />

Commission<br />

DREZNER: Well, I mean, <strong>the</strong> Trilateral Commission's a nongovernmental body,<br />

which -- it raises an interesting question, which is whe<strong>the</strong>r you're going to see –<br />

ROSE: Reflecting <strong>the</strong> sort of elite views of this kind of notion that Japan was now a<br />

partner.<br />

DREZNER: Yeah. I mean, I think you're seeing it already. I mean, you saw it in <strong>the</strong><br />

Davos forum this year, where <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>me was, you know, developing countries and <strong>the</strong><br />

sort of diffusion of power, where I think India, you know, had a, you know, large<br />

representation at <strong>the</strong> Davos Economic Forum.<br />

So yeah, I think you're going to see moves at <strong>the</strong> elite level, and that would actually make<br />

a fair amount of sense.<br />

ROSE: And things like <strong>the</strong> Strategic Economic Dialogue and so forth and –<br />

DREZNER: And bilaterally, I mean, <strong>the</strong> U.S. has launched ambitious dialogues with<br />

both China and India.<br />

The interesting question in <strong>the</strong> future, I think, is going to be whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong>re's continued<br />

political support for doing that at -- let's say after 2008, after <strong>the</strong> 2008 election. My<br />

suspicion is, regardless of who's elected president, eventually <strong>the</strong>y're going to come to <strong>the</strong><br />

same conclusion, but <strong>the</strong>re might be some stumbling around in <strong>the</strong> first six months.<br />

ROSE: Okay. Go forward. Where do you see this all trending in <strong>the</strong> next 10 to 20<br />

<strong>years</strong><br />

DREZNER: In <strong>the</strong> next 10 to 20 <strong>years</strong>, it's going to be interesting. I think <strong>the</strong><br />

fundamental question is going to be whe<strong>the</strong>r, you know, <strong>the</strong> sort of shift that <strong>the</strong> Bush<br />

administration has started and presumably will be continued <strong>by</strong> whoever wins in 2008 is<br />

going to be successful both in bringing China and India into <strong>the</strong>se institutions and also,<br />

you know, roughly speaking, getting <strong>the</strong>m to want <strong>the</strong> same things that we want.<br />

I mean, <strong>the</strong> big $64,000 question is China's regime and, as you said, whe<strong>the</strong>r or not<br />

China's regime maintains <strong>the</strong> current outlook -- <strong>the</strong> current regime type that it's got or<br />

whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong>re's going to be some instability.<br />

That said, I think <strong>the</strong> biggest problem you're going to have is trying to get countries on<br />

<strong>the</strong> wane -- namely, <strong>the</strong> European Union -- to agree to arrangements that give <strong>the</strong>se<br />

countries greater -- you know, give <strong>the</strong>se rising states greater power.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!