Strength and Durability of a 70% Ground Granulated Blast Furnace ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

100 90 80 Durability Factor 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 35 56 Days Fig. 20- Effect of additional wet curing time on Durability Factor-GGBFS/HRWR mix, cast 2-7-00 It appears from Fig. 21 that adding a subsequent 7 day drying period to a 56 day wet curing period does little to benefit tested durability. 39
100 90 80 Durability Factor 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 56 Wet 56 Wet + 7 Dry Days Fig.21- Effect of additional 7 day drying period on Durability Factor-GGBFS/HRWR mix, cast 2-7-00 Fig. 22 shows that the effect of replacement of the last 7 days of a 97 day wet curing period with 7 days of dry curing again seemed to make little difference in the Durability Factor. 40
Page 1 and 2: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Page 3 and 4: TECHNICAL REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE
Page 5 and 6: Table of Contents Acknowledgements.
Page 7 and 8: List of Figures Fig. 1-Effect of sl
Page 9 and 10: List of Tables Table 1-Material Sup
Page 11 and 12: Literature Search General The gener
Page 13 and 14: hydroxide, calcium hydroxide, calci
Page 15 and 16: amount was 50%. Lane and Ozyildirum
Page 17 and 18: Effect of slag characteristics. Bec
Page 19 and 20: 50%, chloride permeability dropped
Page 21 and 22: the carbonation rate increased with
Page 23 and 24: Phase I: Field Investigation Genera
Page 25 and 26: Table 5-GGBFS with HRWR mix proport
Page 27 and 28: Upon fabrication, the specimens wer
Page 29 and 30: Compressive Strength Compressive st
Page 31 and 32: Salt Scaling Salt scaling resistanc
Page 33 and 34: were done manually by RDT personnel
Page 35 and 36: From observation of Tables 3-5 and
Page 37 and 38: 8000 7000 Compressive strength (psi
Page 39 and 40: 8000 Compressive Strength (psi) 700
Page 41 and 42: 7000 56 Day Compressive Strength (p
Page 43 and 44: 700 600 500 400 300 200 100 28 day
Page 45 and 46: 7000 28 Day Compressive Strength (p
Page 47: 100 Avg 90 80 12-14-99 12-14-99 12-
Page 51 and 52: 100 90 80 Durability Factor 70 60 5
Page 53 and 54: 0.2 0.15 Length Change (%) 0.1 0.05
Page 55 and 56: 0.16 0.14 0.12 Length Change (%) 0.
Page 57 and 58: 1.2 1 0.8 Weight Change (%) 0.6 0.4
Page 59 and 60: 8000 7000 6000 Pour 1 Pour 2 Averag
Page 61 and 62: 92.0 90.0 Voids Less Than 0.006 in.
Page 63 and 64: 60 Temperature Differential (C) 50
Page 65 and 66: Previously, it was pointed out that
Page 67 and 68: 160 Percent of OPC 28 Day Compressi
Page 69 and 70: 120 Percent of OPC 28 Day Compressi
Page 71 and 72: Table 13- Type I Mixes w/cm TCM OPC
Page 73 and 74: Table 17- ASTM C 989 Reference Ceme
Page 75 and 76: Results and Discussion Experimental
Page 77 and 78: the PC content when working with la
Page 79 and 80: 3000 Increase in 56 Day Net Compres
Page 81 and 82: 5000 Net 56 Day Compressive Strengt
Page 83 and 84: strengths. The difference in streng
Page 85 and 86: 2) The curing regime for freeze-tha
Page 87 and 88: 26.Hogan, F. J., and Meusel, J. W.,
Page 89 and 90: 58.AASHTO, “Standard Specificatio
Page 91 and 92: Fig. A2- Steel cube molds Curing. T
Page 93 and 94: d γ η= 1− S a Where: Relative D

Strength and Durability of a 70% Ground Granulated Blast Furnace ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?