01.01.2015 Views

Strength and Durability of a 70% Ground Granulated Blast Furnace ...

Strength and Durability of a 70% Ground Granulated Blast Furnace ...

Strength and Durability of a 70% Ground Granulated Blast Furnace ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

with the lower strengths. Most <strong>of</strong> the conditioning methods utilizing extra wet<br />

<strong>and</strong>/or drying time intervals did little to improve the results for the slag mixes;<br />

however, under optimum wet plus dry curing periods, the slag mix <strong>Durability</strong><br />

Factors did approach that <strong>of</strong> the OPC mix.<br />

3. Rapid chloride permeability test values were significantly lower for the GGBFS<br />

mixes compared to the OPC mix. In regard to chloride permeability, both GGBFS<br />

mixes are considered to be low, while the OPC mix result was somewhat high.<br />

The literature is almost universal in supporting this result <strong>of</strong> slag replacement.<br />

Slag replacement reduces permeability from a reduction in pore size, not<br />

necessarily from a reduction in porosity. Because strength is a function <strong>of</strong><br />

porosity, this means that it could be expected that permeability <strong>and</strong> strength may<br />

not correlate well.<br />

4. The OPC control mix had good salt scaling resistance. Both GGBFS types <strong>of</strong><br />

mixes exhibited significantly greater salt scaling than the OPC control. Past<br />

studies indicate that lab scaling tests usually show a reduction in scaling<br />

resistance when slag is used as a replacement for PC due to carbonation effects<br />

<strong>and</strong> testing conditions.<br />

5. Although strength continues to increase after 28 days, qualitative relationships<br />

between different types <strong>of</strong> mixes are usually established by 28 days <strong>of</strong> curing.<br />

Recommendations<br />

1) High-slag content concrete mixes should continue to be considered for<br />

future projects, providing that certain conditions are met. First,<br />

specifications should be written to reflect realistic expectations for: a) the<br />

service requirements <strong>of</strong> the facility, <strong>and</strong> b) the potential <strong>of</strong> the mix design<br />

itself.<br />

a. The specifications should address only those parameters that are <strong>of</strong><br />

interest. For example, the freeze-thaw durability <strong>and</strong> air void system<br />

specifications for exterior concrete should be tailored to the<br />

environment <strong>and</strong> the extent <strong>and</strong> manner in which the structure will be<br />

exposed (drainage considerations). Whether or not salt scaling<br />

resistance will be required should be considered. The level <strong>of</strong> strength<br />

necessary, as opposed to comparison to a non-slag mix, should be<br />

ascertained.<br />

b. Careful attention should be paid during mix design to the actual job<br />

materials that will go into the mix. It should be determined up front<br />

what can be accomplished with the specific mix components in relation<br />

to each other in the proportions anticipated. Once the variables are<br />

studied under controlled laboratory conditions, the mix can be applied<br />

under field conditions.<br />

75

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!