01.01.2015 Views

CIS of Texas Evaluation Fiinal Technical Report - TEA - Home ...

CIS of Texas Evaluation Fiinal Technical Report - TEA - Home ...

CIS of Texas Evaluation Fiinal Technical Report - TEA - Home ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Descriptive Statistics for Case-Managed and Non Case-Managed Students<br />

Of the 12,026 <strong>CIS</strong> case-managed students enrolled in 2005-2006, 7,821 were from third, sixth and ninth grades. Of<br />

these students, 3,097 were selected according to the following criteria: (1) complete 2003-04 baseline data (e.g.,<br />

demographics, “at risk” measures, etc.) and (2) the student remained in the same <strong>CIS</strong> school for three years<br />

(baseline, post1 and post2 years). After the propensity score matching, 1,029 pairs <strong>of</strong> <strong>CIS</strong> and non-<strong>CIS</strong> students<br />

(2,058 in total) remained. Table 1 illustrates the number <strong>of</strong> students during each phase <strong>of</strong> the data selection process.<br />

Table L1. Data Selection Filters<br />

Elementary School<br />

(Grade 3 Cohort)<br />

Middle School<br />

(Grade 6 Cohort)<br />

High School<br />

(Grade 9 Cohort)<br />

<strong>CIS</strong> Non-<strong>CIS</strong> <strong>CIS</strong> Non-<strong>CIS</strong> <strong>CIS</strong> Non-<strong>CIS</strong><br />

Original sample (before<br />

2,304 20,507 3,247 41,303 2,270 76,051<br />

restrictions)<br />

Selected sample (after<br />

523 4,436 1,136 14,028 1,438 30,984<br />

restrictions)<br />

Number <strong>of</strong> matched cases 146 322 561<br />

Data Sources: <strong>CIS</strong>TMS (2005-06) to identify <strong>CIS</strong> case-managed students and PEIMS (2003-04) for matching variables.<br />

The percentage <strong>of</strong> <strong>CIS</strong> case-managed and non case-managed students for each dichotomous outcome variable is<br />

illustrated in Table L2. The mean and standard deviations for the interval scale variable (attendance) is illustrated in<br />

Table 3. The results from base year (2003-04) suggest that matching was successful as <strong>CIS</strong> case-managed students<br />

and non case-managed students were quite similar on all <strong>of</strong> these variables.<br />

Table L2. Descriptive Statistics for Dichotomous Outcome Variables<br />

N <strong>of</strong> Cases <strong>CIS</strong> Students Non-<strong>CIS</strong> Students<br />

Dropout<br />

2003-04<br />

2004-05<br />

2005-06*<br />

2006-07<br />

2058<br />

2058<br />

2058<br />

2058<br />

0.00%<br />

0.00%<br />

1.94%<br />

4.47%<br />

0.00%<br />

0.00%<br />

0.97%<br />

3.50%<br />

Graduation (only high school students)<br />

Promotion<br />

2006-07 1122 56.68% 68.09%<br />

2004-05<br />

2005-06<br />

2006-07<br />

2058<br />

2058<br />

2058<br />

93.20%<br />

95.04%<br />

68.12%<br />

94.46%<br />

96.21%<br />

72.30%<br />

Math Achievement<br />

2003-04<br />

2004-05<br />

2005-06<br />

2006-07<br />

2058<br />

1688<br />

1508<br />

410<br />

53.26%<br />

48.22%<br />

61.14%<br />

54.15%<br />

54.62%<br />

54.15%<br />

67.64%<br />

65.37%<br />

Reading Achievement<br />

2003-04 2058 75.12% 75.12%

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!