AMMTIAC Quarterly, Vol. 2, No. 2 - Advanced Materials ...
AMMTIAC Quarterly, Vol. 2, No. 2 - Advanced Materials ...
AMMTIAC Quarterly, Vol. 2, No. 2 - Advanced Materials ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
techsolutions 5<br />
X-Rays<br />
Visible<br />
10 -2 10 2 10 4 10 6<br />
Gamma Rays Ultraviolet Infrared<br />
Wavelengths in angstrom units (A), where 1 A = 10 -8 cm = 3.937x10 -9 in.<br />
Figure 2. Electromagnetic<br />
Spectrum Showing X-ray and<br />
Gamma Ray Regions.[1]<br />
10 0 A review of radiographs from an F-15 Eagle to<br />
INSPECTION REQUIREMENTS<br />
Several critical elements are required to successfully analyze the<br />
results of radiographic testing. Because of differences in density<br />
and variations in composition, different test pieces can absorb<br />
varying amounts of radiation and therefore present a range of<br />
results. Technicians and radiologists each require several years of<br />
training to properly set up and administer tests and inspections<br />
and to learn how to evaluate<br />
and interpret the results.<br />
Also, as the industry continues<br />
to develop, some forecasts<br />
suggest that in the<br />
future X-rays will be read<br />
almost exclusively by computers.<br />
This specific advancement,<br />
however, would not<br />
A non-destructive inspection technician<br />
(NDI) evaluates an X-ray image of<br />
an A-10 Thunderbolt II aircraft nose<br />
landing gear door for cracks. NDI<br />
technicians are tasked with finding<br />
and confirming discontinuities on the<br />
airframe and its parts using methods<br />
such as Eddy Current, Fluorescent<br />
Penetrant, Magnetic Particles, Ultra<br />
Sound and X-ray. (Photo taken by<br />
Airman 1st Class Alesia Goosic and<br />
provided courtesy of US Air Force)<br />
necessarily eliminate the<br />
high costs associated with<br />
set up tasks, which consumes<br />
a significant portion<br />
of the total radiographic<br />
inspection time.<br />
Safety<br />
Safety is an important issue<br />
to consider when evaluating<br />
a new process for implementation,<br />
especially one such as radiography that requires the<br />
use of radiation. Several governing bodies, including local and<br />
state governments, work together to closely monitor anyone who<br />
works with radiography equipment to ensure that the highest<br />
levels of safety are consistently met.<br />
The licensing and certification process for individuals working<br />
with radiography equipment, which emits radiation, requires<br />
both a written examination and an assessment of specific skills<br />
while using the equipment. The primary governing body that<br />
administers the written examination is the American Society of<br />
<strong>No</strong>ndestructive Testing (ASNT). The practical skills evaluation<br />
can be conducted by a variety of institutions that have approval<br />
from ASNT. With successful completion of these safety requirements,<br />
the applicant will be certified as an Industrial Radiography<br />
Radiation Safety Personnel (IRRSP) member. ASNT<br />
offers more detailed information on the entire certification<br />
process, including a more specific list of requirements.[4]<br />
PRACTICAL CONSIDERATIONS<br />
There are several factors to take into account when considering<br />
the implementation of a radiographic inspection program. Some<br />
of the most important factors include: cost, density, facility size<br />
and logistics. Compared to other nondestructive testing methods,<br />
radiography is expensive. Relatively large costs can be<br />
reduced considerably when portable X-ray or gamma-ray sources<br />
are used in film radiography because this setup only requires<br />
space for film processing and analysis. With real-time radiography,<br />
operating costs are usually much lower, because setup times<br />
are shorter and there are no extra costs for processing or interpretation<br />
of film.<br />
Advantages and Disadvantages<br />
Like all other NDT methods, there are several advantages<br />
and disadvantages that factor into deciding where and when<br />
radiography is typically applied. In relation to other commonly<br />
used NDT methods, the well-proven method of radiography<br />
has three main advantages: the ability to detect internal<br />
flaws, the ability to detect significant variations in composition,<br />
and the ability<br />
to establish a<br />
permanent record<br />
of raw inspection<br />
data. Radiography<br />
also presents<br />
test results pictorially<br />
which can be<br />
much more readily<br />
interpreted than<br />
numerical data.<br />
In addition, realtime<br />
radiography<br />
check for foreign object debris and cracks<br />
in the aircraft's structure. (Photo taken by<br />
Staff Sgt. Shelley Gill and provided courtesy<br />
offers the ability of US Air Force)<br />
to rotate a test<br />
object during inspection, which improves detection of both<br />
internal and external flaws due to the ability to find the optimum<br />
orientation.<br />
On the negative side, orientation of the sample to be<br />
inspected is a key to successful radiographic inspection and<br />
therefore can pose difficulties if the proper orientation is not<br />
found. For example, radiography is not as effective at detecting<br />
flaws that are oriented in a planar direction with respect to the<br />
radiation source. Thick inspection samples are also problemat-<br />
8<br />
The <strong>AMMTIAC</strong> <strong>Quarterly</strong>, <strong>Vol</strong>ume 2, Number 2