06.01.2015 Views

Trees and the Public Realm - Westminster City Council

Trees and the Public Realm - Westminster City Council

Trees and the Public Realm - Westminster City Council

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Appendix C - 2<br />

<strong>Trees</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Public</strong> <strong>Realm</strong> (Draft)<br />

These required minimums are very useful when planning <strong>the</strong> development of large sites, with new streets, but<br />

<strong>Westminster</strong> has few areas where such development is likely to occur in <strong>the</strong> short or medium term. Many of<br />

our existing streets were not designed to modern st<strong>and</strong>ards, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>re is simply insufficient width to provide a<br />

minimum of 2m clear for pedestrians. Never<strong>the</strong>less, this is our aim, balanced against <strong>the</strong> benefits of<br />

providing street trees, in order to avoid not only inconvenience, but danger that can occur by encouraging<br />

stepping into <strong>the</strong> carriageway.<br />

Where this is not practical, we revert to The DfT’s Inclusive Mobility, which states:<br />

“A clear width of 2m allows two wheelchairs to pass one ano<strong>the</strong>r comfortably. This should be regarded<br />

as <strong>the</strong> minimum under normal circumstances. Where this is not possible because of physical<br />

constraints 1.5m could be regarded as <strong>the</strong> minimum acceptable under most circumstances, giving<br />

sufficient space for a wheelchair user <strong>and</strong> a walker to pass one ano<strong>the</strong>r. The absolute minimum, where<br />

<strong>the</strong>re is an obstacle, should be 1m clear space. The maximum length of restricted width should be 6<br />

metres. If <strong>the</strong>re are local restrictions or obstacles causing this sort of reduction in width <strong>the</strong>y should be<br />

grouped in a logical <strong>and</strong> regular pattern to assist visually impaired people.<br />

It is also recommended that <strong>the</strong>re should be minimum widths of 3m at bus stops <strong>and</strong> 3.5m to 4.5m by<br />

shops though it is recognized that available space will not always be sufficient to achieve <strong>the</strong>se<br />

dimensions.”<br />

<strong>Trees</strong> <strong>the</strong>refore will never be planted in <strong>the</strong> footway when <strong>the</strong> tree (taking account of any expected<br />

incremental enlargement of <strong>the</strong> trunk) is likely to reduce pedestrian clearances to less than 1m. The tree pit<br />

itself cannot be included in <strong>the</strong> measurement of clear width unless <strong>the</strong> surface is useable by a wheelchair. If<br />

resin-bound aggregate is used as a pit surface, <strong>the</strong>n it can be classed as clear width, o<strong>the</strong>rwise <strong>the</strong><br />

measurement must be taken from <strong>the</strong> edge of <strong>the</strong> pit to <strong>the</strong> edge of <strong>the</strong> public highway (not necessarily <strong>the</strong><br />

building façade).<br />

<strong>Trees</strong> should not obstruct pedestrian sightlines. In general driver sightlines also need to be maintained,<br />

although avenue planting can be used as a tool to increase perceptions of speed <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>reby limiting traffic<br />

speeds.<br />

New planting should consider <strong>the</strong> function of existing street furniture such as street lights <strong>and</strong> CCTV cameras,<br />

as foliage can block lights <strong>and</strong> images. Tree planting should respect <strong>the</strong>se primary functions, <strong>and</strong> where<br />

street furniture cannot be relocated, <strong>the</strong> location of planting should be reconsidered.<br />

Over <strong>the</strong> page are <strong>the</strong> arrangements found in typical streets in <strong>Westminster</strong>, <strong>and</strong> where trees could be<br />

planted within <strong>the</strong>m. Fur<strong>the</strong>r detail can be found in <strong>the</strong> <strong>Westminster</strong> Way public realm manual.<br />

When choosing a specific location in <strong>the</strong>se streets an important consideration is how content <strong>the</strong> tree will be.<br />

This includes how close to its natural proportions can it grow (it should be able to grow to at least look<br />

‘natural’), <strong>and</strong> what will it contribute to, or harm, in <strong>the</strong> street scene when fully grown, for example shade,<br />

pedestrian impediment, colour, obstruction of views or important buildings, or habitat for particular fauna.<br />

The ability of <strong>the</strong> tree to co-exist alongside services is a crucial factor. The size of <strong>the</strong> space available above<br />

<strong>and</strong> below ground will be a key factor in species choice. Pit dimensions should provide <strong>the</strong> tree with as<br />

much space to become established as far as is possible <strong>and</strong> practical given its location. New planting<br />

techniques have been developed to assist street tree planting where <strong>the</strong>re are space limitations, as is <strong>the</strong><br />

case in much of <strong>Westminster</strong>. Such techniques include <strong>the</strong> use of root barriers, or specially formulated<br />

topsoil allowing <strong>the</strong> creation of larger planting pits, essential for <strong>the</strong> planting of what could become a<br />

characterful tree. Detailed advice on this issue is contained in Tree Roots in <strong>the</strong> Built Environment (June 2006 -<br />

References in Appendix H).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!