08.01.2015 Views

A Closer Look at Prevailing Civil Engineering Practice - European ...

A Closer Look at Prevailing Civil Engineering Practice - European ...

A Closer Look at Prevailing Civil Engineering Practice - European ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

A <strong>Closer</strong> <strong>Look</strong> <strong>at</strong> <strong>Prevailing</strong> <strong>Civil</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>Practice</strong>, Wh<strong>at</strong>, Why and How<br />

Vincent T. H. CHU<br />

where t = Pipe thickness<br />

F = Factor of Safety of 2<br />

P = Working pressure<br />

S = Surge pressure<br />

Y = Yield strength of ductile iron<br />

For steel pipes the design of working pressure is based on 50% of steel<br />

yield strength (i.e. a factor of safety of 2). The presence of surges could be<br />

allowed to increase the stress in pipe to 75% of yield strength. The design<br />

is based on the following steps:<br />

(A) If surge pressure is less than or equal to one-half of working pressure,<br />

the pipe shall be designed using working pressure only with 50% yield<br />

strength as allowable stress.<br />

PD<br />

t = where Y = 50% of yield strength<br />

2Y<br />

(B) If surge pressure is more than or equal to one-half of working pressure,<br />

the pipe shall be designed using working pressure and surge pressure<br />

only with 75% yield strength as allowable stress.<br />

( P + S)<br />

D<br />

t = where Y = 75% of yield strength<br />

2Y<br />

For case A, the use of 50% yield strength is essentially the same of<br />

adopting a safety factor of 2 in DI pipe design. However, as surge pressure<br />

is not considered, the thickness calcul<strong>at</strong>ed is smaller than th<strong>at</strong> in DI pipe<br />

design.<br />

For case B, the use of 75% yield strength is essentially the same of<br />

adopting a safety factor of 1.33 in DI pipe design. As such, the thickness<br />

calcul<strong>at</strong>ed is smaller than th<strong>at</strong> in DI pipe design.<br />

9. Wh<strong>at</strong> are the controversial health issues of using asbestos cement<br />

pipes for w<strong>at</strong>ermain<br />

There are suspected health hazard for using asbestos cement pipes for<br />

w<strong>at</strong>ermain. In drinking w<strong>at</strong>er the gastrointestinal tract cancer risk depends<br />

on the amount of asbestos swallowed. When asbestos cement pipes are in<br />

good condition, there should be little safety problem. However, when the<br />

73

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!