08.01.2015 Views

Guidance Paper - The Institute of Risk Management

Guidance Paper - The Institute of Risk Management

Guidance Paper - The Institute of Risk Management

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

III Constructing a risk appetite<br />

“Managing the right levers”<br />

301<br />

302<br />

Level<br />

Strategic<br />

Tactical<br />

Project/<br />

Operational<br />

In Section II <strong>of</strong> this paper we explored the main issues in designing the risk<br />

appetite framework: in this section, we look at each <strong>of</strong> the main elements in<br />

the middle <strong>of</strong> the framework in more detail.<br />

At the heart <strong>of</strong> the risk appetite framework, once an organisation<br />

understands their capability to manage risk, we have the main issues that an<br />

organisation has to deal with in setting and monitoring its risk appetite.<br />

<strong>The</strong>se are set out in the diagram below:<br />

Figure 8 - <strong>Risk</strong> appetite - Main Issues<br />

Propensity<br />

to take risk<br />

Delegation<br />

<strong>Risk</strong> Taking<br />

Propensity<br />

to exercise<br />

control<br />

Exercising<br />

Control<br />

Escalation<br />

Measurement<br />

Stakeholder<br />

Value<br />

<strong>Risk</strong><br />

Metrics<br />

Control<br />

Metrics<br />

Levels <strong>of</strong> risk<br />

appetite<br />

Strategic<br />

303<br />

This framework envisages at<br />

least three levels <strong>of</strong> risk<br />

appetite as set out in the<br />

following paragraphs.<br />

304<br />

At a strategic level, risk<br />

appetite is predominantly<br />

about the risks or types <strong>of</strong> risks<br />

that an organisation has a comparative<br />

advantage in managing (or indeed<br />

knowing that they can neither manage<br />

nor mitigate). <strong>The</strong>se provide it with its<br />

competitive advantage (private sector) or<br />

its ability to achieve its objectives (public<br />

or third sector). <strong>Risk</strong> appetite at the<br />

strategic level will also be about deciding<br />

from which risks or types <strong>of</strong> risk the<br />

organisation needs to protect itself.<br />

Strategic <strong>Risk</strong><br />

Some examples <strong>of</strong> strategic risks:<br />

• <strong>Risk</strong>s in connection with decisions<br />

about outsourcing or maintaining<br />

processes and competencies in-house.<br />

• <strong>Risk</strong>s concerning new product<br />

developments, such as new<br />

innovations, R&D, new product<br />

lines.<br />

• <strong>Risk</strong>s concerning new sources<br />

<strong>of</strong> finance, such as the optimal<br />

debt:equity ratio, banking<br />

covenants, headroom and liquidity.<br />

• <strong>Risk</strong>s concerning acquisitions or<br />

disposals including the likelihood <strong>of</strong><br />

achieving organisational objectives<br />

or destroying shareholder value.<br />

23

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!