Dakshin Gujarat Vij Company Limited Suo - Motu Case No ... - GERC
Dakshin Gujarat Vij Company Limited Suo - Motu Case No ... - GERC
Dakshin Gujarat Vij Company Limited Suo - Motu Case No ... - GERC
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Dakshin</strong> <strong>Gujarat</strong> <strong>Vij</strong> <strong>Company</strong> <strong>Limited</strong><br />
Truing up for FY 2010-11<br />
and Determination of Tariff for FY 2012-13<br />
the truing up of FY 2010-11 and determination of tariff for FY 202-13 latest by 30 th<br />
<strong>No</strong>vember, 2011.<br />
DGVCL expressed difficulty regarding non-availability of revenue data due to<br />
implementation of the revised and restructured tariff approved by the Commission<br />
with effect from 1 st September, 2011. Looking to the genuineness of the concern of<br />
DGVCL, the Commission extended the date of filing the petition till 20 th December,<br />
2011. Thereafter, DGVCL requested the Commission to grant extension of time till<br />
end of January, 2012 due to its inability to get the required revenue data and time<br />
period required for finalisation of tariff petition for FY 2012-13. The DGVCL also<br />
submitted that consultation with the Government of <strong>Gujarat</strong> for subsidy commitment<br />
would be possible only by the end of January, 2012. Considering the request of<br />
DGVCL, the Commission granted extension for filing the petition up to January 31,<br />
2012. DGVCL failed to file the petition even after the expiry of the time limit granted<br />
by the Commission.<br />
In the order on OP NO. 1 of 2011, Hon‟ble APTEL has directed the State<br />
Commissions that “ In the event of delay in filing of the ARR, truing-up and Annual<br />
Performance Review, one month beyond the scheduled date of submission of the<br />
petition, the State Commission must initiate suo-motu proceedings for tariff<br />
determination in accordance with Section 64 of the Act read with clause 8.1 (7) of the<br />
Tariff Policy.”<br />
In pursuance with the direction of the Honourable APTEL, powers conferred under<br />
Section 64 of the Indian Electricity Act, 2003 and Regulation 10.2 and 26.2 of the<br />
<strong>GERC</strong> (MYT Tariff Regulations, 2011) the Commission decided to initiate the suomotu<br />
proceedings for True up of FY 2010-11 and tariff determination for FY 2012-13<br />
for DGVCL as case no. 1195 of 2012.<br />
The Commission intimated DGVCL vide letter dated 23 rd February, 2012 to remain<br />
present on 28 th February, 2012 and explain the reasons to the Commission for delay<br />
in filing the True up and tariff petition. DGVCL was also directed to submit the actuals<br />
of the FY 2010-11 for Truing up of ARR and projected revenue for FY 2012-13 from<br />
the sales approved in the MYT order.<br />
<strong>Gujarat</strong> Electricity Regulatory Commission Page 4<br />
June 2012