08.01.2015 Views

Dakshin Gujarat Vij Company Limited Suo - Motu Case No ... - GERC

Dakshin Gujarat Vij Company Limited Suo - Motu Case No ... - GERC

Dakshin Gujarat Vij Company Limited Suo - Motu Case No ... - GERC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Dakshin</strong> <strong>Gujarat</strong> <strong>Vij</strong> <strong>Company</strong> <strong>Limited</strong><br />

Truing up for FY 2010-11<br />

and Determination of Tariff for FY 2012-13<br />

consumer‟s load factor, power factor, voltage, total consumption of electricity during<br />

any specified period or the time at which the supply is required or the geographical<br />

position of any area, the nature of supply and the purpose for which the supply is<br />

required. Therefore, the demand of separate tariff category for telecom towers within<br />

<strong>No</strong>n-RGP category is unjust.<br />

The licensee has submitted that the cost to Serve Report for FY 2009-10 is already<br />

submitted to the Commission for all DISCOMs by GUVNL. Regarding the tariff for<br />

different category of consumers, it is to state that the National Tariff Policy mentions<br />

the need for rationalization of tariff for various consumer categories such that it is<br />

more aligned to the cost of supply and in a band of ±20% of the average cost of<br />

supply.<br />

Commission’s View: A separate tariff for telecom installations has to be viewed in<br />

the larger context of a comprehensive review of the tariff structure. Further, the<br />

Commission tried to determine the tariff for all the categories as per the existing<br />

ground realities and provisions of the Act and Policy.<br />

14. Tariff for Railway Traction<br />

Objection: The existing tariff of the Railway traction be reduced and brought down to<br />

a reasonable level proportionate to the actual cost of supply of the DISCOMs.<br />

Further, the Western railway has requested that the cost of supply should be<br />

calculated separately for the EHT consumers as distribution losses will not be<br />

applicable and tariff should be determined as per the Tariff Policy i.e. ± 20% of<br />

average cost of supply.<br />

Response of the Licensee: The licensee has submitted that there has been no<br />

revision of the energy charges of the railways since last seven tariff orders even<br />

though there has been substantial increase in the cost of operations and service for<br />

the utility and the rate of inflation. Moreover, the freight costs charged by the<br />

Railways for transportation of fuel have been increased substantially in the last<br />

couple of years.<br />

Further, the licensee has submitted that most of the public sector utilities are working<br />

with the principle of subsidizing some part of the consumers. It is not possible for the<br />

<strong>Gujarat</strong> Electricity Regulatory Commission Page 20<br />

June 2012

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!