Dakshin Gujarat Vij Company Limited Suo - Motu Case No ... - GERC
Dakshin Gujarat Vij Company Limited Suo - Motu Case No ... - GERC
Dakshin Gujarat Vij Company Limited Suo - Motu Case No ... - GERC
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Dakshin</strong> <strong>Gujarat</strong> <strong>Vij</strong> <strong>Company</strong> <strong>Limited</strong><br />
Truing up for FY 2010-11<br />
and Determination of Tariff for FY 2012-13<br />
consumer‟s load factor, power factor, voltage, total consumption of electricity during<br />
any specified period or the time at which the supply is required or the geographical<br />
position of any area, the nature of supply and the purpose for which the supply is<br />
required. Therefore, the demand of separate tariff category for telecom towers within<br />
<strong>No</strong>n-RGP category is unjust.<br />
The licensee has submitted that the cost to Serve Report for FY 2009-10 is already<br />
submitted to the Commission for all DISCOMs by GUVNL. Regarding the tariff for<br />
different category of consumers, it is to state that the National Tariff Policy mentions<br />
the need for rationalization of tariff for various consumer categories such that it is<br />
more aligned to the cost of supply and in a band of ±20% of the average cost of<br />
supply.<br />
Commission’s View: A separate tariff for telecom installations has to be viewed in<br />
the larger context of a comprehensive review of the tariff structure. Further, the<br />
Commission tried to determine the tariff for all the categories as per the existing<br />
ground realities and provisions of the Act and Policy.<br />
14. Tariff for Railway Traction<br />
Objection: The existing tariff of the Railway traction be reduced and brought down to<br />
a reasonable level proportionate to the actual cost of supply of the DISCOMs.<br />
Further, the Western railway has requested that the cost of supply should be<br />
calculated separately for the EHT consumers as distribution losses will not be<br />
applicable and tariff should be determined as per the Tariff Policy i.e. ± 20% of<br />
average cost of supply.<br />
Response of the Licensee: The licensee has submitted that there has been no<br />
revision of the energy charges of the railways since last seven tariff orders even<br />
though there has been substantial increase in the cost of operations and service for<br />
the utility and the rate of inflation. Moreover, the freight costs charged by the<br />
Railways for transportation of fuel have been increased substantially in the last<br />
couple of years.<br />
Further, the licensee has submitted that most of the public sector utilities are working<br />
with the principle of subsidizing some part of the consumers. It is not possible for the<br />
<strong>Gujarat</strong> Electricity Regulatory Commission Page 20<br />
June 2012