Download issue - Umeå universitet

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Majid N. Al-Amri References Bakhtin, M. M. (1981) The dialogic imagination: Four essays. (Edited by M. Holquist) (Translated by C. Emerson & M. Holquist) Austin: University of Texas Press. Brouwer, C., & Wagner, J. (2004) Developmental <strong>issue</strong>s in second language conversation. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1.1, 30-47. Cromdal, J. (2001) Can I be with you: Negotiating play entry in a bilingual school. Journal of Pragmatics, 33, 515-543. Drew, P. & Heritage, J. (1992) Talk at Work. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Gardner, R., & Wagner, J. (eds.) (2004) Second language conversations. London: Continuum. Gee, J. P. (2000) An introduction to Discourse Analysis. London: Routledge. Gee, J. P. (2004) Situated language and learning: A critique of traditional schooling. New York: Routledge. Heritage, J. (1984) Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press. Hutchby, I. & Wooffitt, R. (1998) Conversation Analysis. Oxford: Polity Press. Kasper, G. (2006) Beyond repair: Conversation analysis as an approach to SLA. AILA Review, 19, 83-99. Kincheloe, J. (2005) Critical constructivism. New York: Peter Lang Publishing, Inc. Kumashiro, K. K. (2004) Against common sense: Teaching and learning towards social justice. New York, NY: RoutledgeFalmer. Landay, E. (2004) Performance as the foundation for a secondary school literacy program: A Bakhtinian perspective. In A. B. Ball & S. W. Freeman (Eds.), Bakhtinian perspectives on language, literacy, and learning (pp. 107-128) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Lazaraton, A. ( 2003) Incidental displays of cultural knowledge in the nonnative-English-speaking teacher’s classroom. TESOL Quarterly 37: 213-245. Levinson, S. (1983) Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Markee, N. (2000) Conversation analysis. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Markee, N. ( 2004) Zones of interactional transition in ESL classes. Modern Language Journal 88: 583-596. Miller, J. & Eimas, P. (1995) Speech, Language and Communication. London: Academic Press. Pomerantz, Anita M. (1984) Agreeing and disagreeing with assessment: Some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structure of Social Action: Studies in ConversationeAnalysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Psathas, G. (1995) Conversation analysis: The study of talk-in-interaction. London: Sage. Richards, J. & Schmidt, R. (1983 Language andnCommunication. London: Longman. Richards, K., & Seedhouse, P. (eds. (2005) Applying conversation analysis. Houndsmill: Palgrave. Sacks, Harvey, Schegloff, Emanuel A. and Jefferson, Gail (1974) The simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language 50, 696-735. Schegloff, E. (1968) Sequencing in conversationaleopenings. The American Anthropologist, 70 (6), 1075-1095. Schegloff E. A., Sacks, H. (1973) Opening up closings. Semiotica 8: 289-327. Seedhouse, P. (2004) The interactional architecture of the language classroom: A conversation analysis perspective. Oxford: Blackwell. Seedhouse P. (2005) Conversation analysis and language eearning. Language Teaching, 38(4), 165-187. 150
Getting Beyond Conversation Analysis: Critical and Pedagogical Implications for TESOL/Bilingual Curriculum for Diverse Learners in the Age of Globalization Tsui, A. B. M. (1994) English conversation. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Valencia, R. R. (1997) Conceptualizing the notion of deficitnthinking. In R. R. Valencia (Ed.), The evolution of deficit thinking:tEducational thought and practice (pp. 1-12). Washington, DC: The Falmer Press. Young, R. F., & Miller, E. R. (2004) Learning as changing participation: Negotiating discourse roles in the ESL writing conference. The Modern Language Journal, 88 (4), 519-535. Yule, G. (1996) Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 151
Page 1 and 2:
EDUCATION INQUIRY Volume 2, No. 1,
Page 3 and 4:
Editorial Per-Olof Erixon, Editor E
Page 5:
THEMATIC SECTION HISTORY TEXTBOOK R
Page 8 and 9:
Stuart Foster that what is “in”
Page 10 and 11:
Stuart Foster and textbook authors
Page 12 and 13:
Stuart Foster and Grant argued that
Page 14 and 15:
Stuart Foster International perspec
Page 16 and 17:
Stuart Foster tory textbooks delibe
Page 18 and 19:
Stuart Foster colonial history. Dra
Page 20 and 21:
Stuart Foster References Adams, C.
Page 22 and 23:
Stuart Foster Trecker, J.L. (1971)
Page 24 and 25:
Romain Faure degree only be explain
Page 26 and 27:
Romain Faure several so-called “p
Page 28 and 29:
Romain Faure be emphasised that the
Page 30 and 31:
Romain Faure nections were not clos
Page 32 and 33:
Romain Faure ably be interpreted as
Page 34 and 35:
Romain Faure decreased. This appear
Page 36 and 37:
Romain Faure References Bendick, R.
Page 39 and 40:
Education Inquiry Vol. 2, No. 1, Ma
Page 41 and 42:
UNESCO and Council of Europe Guidel
Page 43 and 44:
Page 45 and 46:
Page 47 and 48:
Page 49 and 50:
Page 51 and 52:
Page 53 and 54:
Page 55 and 56:
Page 57 and 58:
Page 59 and 60:
Page 61 and 62:
Page 63 and 64:
Page 65 and 66:
The Meaning and Use of “Europe”
Page 67 and 68:
Page 69 and 70:
Page 71 and 72:
Page 73 and 74:
Page 75 and 76:
Page 77 and 78:
Page 79 and 80:
Page 81 and 82:
Page 83 and 84:
Nation-Building in Kenyan Secondary
Page 85 and 86:
Page 87 and 88:
Page 89 and 90:
Page 91 and 92:
Page 93:
Page 96 and 97:
Erik Sjöberg and been withdrawn, w
Page 98 and 99:
Erik Sjöberg launched in order to
Page 100 and 101:
Erik Sjöberg Slavs in the Macedoni
Page 102 and 103: Erik Sjöberg Michalopoulos’ arti
Page 104 and 105: Erik Sjöberg Western Europe was pu
Page 106 and 107: Erik Sjöberg Crabtree and Dunn (19
Page 108 and 109: Erik Sjöberg Liakos, A. (2004) Mod
Page 110 and 111: 108
Page 112 and 113: 110
Page 114 and 115: Elisabet Malmström be a resource i
Page 116 and 117: Elisabet Malmström show that many
Page 118 and 119: Elisabet Malmström comparing diffe
Page 120 and 121: Elisabet Malmström A dot can be an
Page 122 and 123: Elisabet Malmström Semio-cognitive
Page 124 and 125: Elisabet Malmström Combining the v
Page 126 and 127: Elisabet Malmström Figure 2. The b
Page 128 and 129: Elisabet Malmström Nordström, G.
Page 130 and 131: Ingrid Helleve & Marit Ulvik Backgr
Page 132 and 133: Ingrid Helleve & Marit Ulvik 2006;
Page 134 and 135: Ingrid Helleve & Marit Ulvik how mu
Page 136 and 137: Ingrid Helleve & Marit Ulvik The me
Page 138 and 139: Ingrid Helleve & Marit Ulvik Other
Page 140 and 141: Ingrid Helleve & Marit Ulvik Refere
Page 142 and 143: 140
Page 144 and 145: Majid N. Al-Amri to establish a lin
Page 146 and 147: Majid N. Al-Amri types of pre-seque
Page 148 and 149: Majid N. Al-Amri with his tutor onc
Page 150 and 151: Majid N. Al-Amri the different exce
Page 154 and 155: 152
Page 156 and 157: Ulf Blossing & Sigrun K. Ertesvåg
show all

Download issue - Umeå universitet

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?